National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- (-) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (3)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Provider Performance (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- (-) Quality Measures (3)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedClassen DC, Holmgren AJ, Co Z
National trends in the safety performance of electronic health record systems from 2009 to 2018.
This study examined trends in the safety performance of electronic health records (EHRs) in hospitals from 2009 to 2018. The Leapfrog Health IT Safety Measure test was administered by the Leapfrog Group from July 2018 to December 1, 2019. Overall mean performance scores increased from 53.9% in 2009 to 65.6% in 2018. Mean hospital scores for categories representing basic clinical decision support increased from 69.8% in 2009 to 85.6% in 2018. Advanced decision clinical support also increased from 29.5% in 2009 to 46.1%. These results showed great improvement, but there is still substantial safety risk in current hospital EHR systems.
AHRQ-funded; HS023696.
Citation: Classen DC, Holmgren AJ, Co Z .
National trends in the safety performance of electronic health record systems from 2009 to 2018.
JAMA Netw Open 2020 May;3(5):e205547. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5547..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Hospitals, Patient Safety, Quality Measures, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Quality Indicators (QIs)
Bowen ME, Bhat D, Fish J
Improving performance on preventive health quality measures using clinical decision support to capture care done elsewhere and patient exceptions.
This before-after study was conducted to examine the ability of clinical decision support (CDS) to improve performance on preventive quality measures, capture clinician-reported services completed elsewhere, and patient/medical exceptions and to describe their impact on quality measurement.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Bowen ME, Bhat D, Fish J .
Improving performance on preventive health quality measures using clinical decision support to capture care done elsewhere and patient exceptions.
Am J Med Qual 2018 May/Jun;33(3):237-45. doi: 10.1177/1062860617732830..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Prevention, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement, Quality Measures, Quality Measures
Einbinder J, Hebel E, Wright A
The number needed to remind: a measure for assessing CDS effectiveness.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a better understanding of population based clinical decision support (CDS) performance measurement, to identify best practices for designing and implementing CDS, and to introduce two new quality measures, titled Reminder Performance (RP) and the Number Needed to Remind (NNR) for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical reminders in the context of the CDS Dashboards.
AHRQ-funded; 290200810010.
Citation: Einbinder J, Hebel E, Wright A .
The number needed to remind: a measure for assessing CDS effectiveness.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2014 Nov 14;2014:506-15..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Quality Measures, Quality of Care