National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Blood Pressure (1)
- (-) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (3)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Imaging (1)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Provider (2)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Nurse (1)
- (-) Provider: Physician (3)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Shared Decision Making (3)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedDorr DA, Richardson JE, Bobo M
Provider perspectives on patient- and provider-facing high blood pressure clinical decision support.
This study tried to partly address the challenge of developing a patient-facing clinician decision support (CDS) for persistent high blood pressure (HBP). The authors sought to understand provider variations and rationales related to HBP guideline recommendations and perceptions regarding patient role and use of digital tools. They implemented a pilot and final survey for hypertension experts and primary care physicians. Five clinical cases were presented that queried clinicians' attitudes related to actions; variations; prioritization; patient input; importance; and barriers for HBP diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. Fifteen hypertension experts and 14 providers took the pilot and final versions of the survey. The majority (over 80%) of providers felt the recommendations were important yet found them difficult to follow-up to 90% of the time. Provider perceptions of relative amounts of patient input and patient work for effective HBP management ranged from 22 to 100%. Reasons for variation provided included adverse effects of treatment, patient comorbidities, shared decision-making, and health care cost and access issues. Respondents were generally positive toward patient use of electronic CDS applications but worried about access to health care, nuance of recommendations, and patient understanding of the tools.
AHRQ-funded; HS26849.
Citation: Dorr DA, Richardson JE, Bobo M .
Provider perspectives on patient- and provider-facing high blood pressure clinical decision support.
Appl Clin Inform 2022 Oct;13(5):1131-40. doi: 10.1055/a-1926-0199..
Keywords: Blood Pressure, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Provider: Physician
Westafer LM, Kunz A, Bugajska P
Provider perspectives on the use of evidence-based risk stratification tools in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism: a qualitative study.
Providers often pursue imaging in patients at low risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), resulting in imaging yields <10% and false-positive imaging rates of 10% to 25%. Attempts to curb overtesting have had only modest success and no interventions have used implementation science frameworks. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to the adoption of evidence-based diagnostic testing for PE.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Westafer LM, Kunz A, Bugajska P .
Provider perspectives on the use of evidence-based risk stratification tools in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism: a qualitative study.
Acad Emerg Med 2020 Jun;27(6):447-56. doi: 10.1111/acem.13908..
Keywords: Respiratory Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Imaging, Shared Decision Making, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Practice Patterns, Provider: Physician, Provider: Clinician, Provider
Ancker JS, Edwards A, Nosal S
Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system.
In this study, the investigators tested hypotheses arising from two possible alert fatigue mechanisms: (A) cognitive overload associated with amount of work, complexity of work, and effort distinguishing informative from uninformative alerts, and (B) desensitization from repeated exposure to the same alert over time. The investigators found that clinicians became less likely to accept alerts as they received more of them, particularly more repeated alerts. There was no evidence of an effect of workload per se, or of desensitization over time for a newly deployed alert.
AHRQ-funded; HS021531.
Citation: Ancker JS, Edwards A, Nosal S .
Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017 Apr 10;17(1):1-9. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0430-8..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Safety, Provider, Provider: Nurse, Provider: Physician