National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedAnderson KE, Wu RJ, Darden M
Medicare Advantage is associated with lower utilization of total joint arthroplasty.
To discover whether Medicare Advantage enrollees have a lower utilization of elective surgical procedures such as inpatient hip and knee total joint arthroplasty (TJA), which have usually been covered by traditional Medicare without restrictions, researchers conducted a cross-sectional study comparing traditional Medicare claims and Medicare Advantage encounter records for enrollees aged 65-85. Their results showed a lower incidence of TJA in Medicare Advantage enrollees. The interval from initial diagnosis to contact with an orthopedic surgeon and to the surgical procedure were shorter among traditional enrollees.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: Anderson KE, Wu RJ, Darden M .
Medicare Advantage is associated with lower utilization of total joint arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2024 Feb 7; 106(3):198-205. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.23.00507..
Keywords: Medicare, Orthopedics, Surgery
Kalata S, Schaefer SL, Nuliyahu U
Low-volume elective surgery and outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries treated at hospital networks.
This cross-sectional study’s objective was to quantify low-volume surgery and associated outcomes within hospital networks. This study used Medicare Provider Analysis and Review data to examine fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years who underwent 1 of 10 elective surgical procedures (abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, mitral valve repair, hip or knee replacement, bariatric surgery, or resection for lung, esophageal, pancreatic, or rectal cancers) in a network hospital from 2016 to 2018. Hospital volume for each procedure (calculated with the use of National Inpatient Sample data) was compared with yearly hospital volume standards for that procedure recommended by The Leapfrog Group. The authors analyzed primary outcomes which were postoperative complications, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality, stratified by the volume status of the hospital and network type. Secondary outcome was the availability of a different high-volume hospital within the same network or outside the network and its proximity to the patient (based on hospital referral region and zip code). In all, data were analyzed for 950,079 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (average age 74.4 years; 621,138 females and 427,931 males) who underwent 1,049,069 procedures at 2469 hospitals within 382 networks. Of these networks, almost 100% [380 (99.5%)] had at least 1 low-volume hospital performing the elective procedure of interest. In 79.8% of procedures that were performed at low-volume hospitals, there was a hospital that met volume standards within the same network and hospital referral region located a median (IQR) distance of 29 (12-60) miles from the patient's home. In adjusted analyses, postoperative outcomes were inferior at low-volume hospitals compared with hospitals meeting volume standards, with a 30-day mortality of 8.1% at low-volume hospitals vs 5.5% at hospitals that met volume standards.
AHRQ-funded; HS028606.
Citation: Kalata S, Schaefer SL, Nuliyahu U .
Low-volume elective surgery and outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries treated at hospital networks.
JAMA Surg 2024 Feb; 159(2):203-10. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6542.
Keywords: Surgery, Medicare, Hospitals, Outcomes
Danielson EC, Li W, Suleiman L
Social risk and patient-reported outcomes after total knee replacement: implications for Medicare policy.
The objective of this study was to determine if county- or patient-level social risk factors are associated with patient-reported outcomes after total knee replacement when added to the comprehensive joint replacement risk-adjustment model. Patient and outcomes data from the Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement cohort were merged with the CDC Social Vulnerability Index. The findings indicated that patient-reported race, education, and income were associated with patient-reported pain or functional scores; pain improvement was negatively associated with Black race and positively associated with higher annual incomes. The authors concluded that these findings suggested that patient-level social factors warrant further investigation to promote health equity in patient-reported outcomes after total knee replacement.
Citation: Danielson EC, Li W, Suleiman L .
Social risk and patient-reported outcomes after total knee replacement: implications for Medicare policy.
Health Serv Res 2024 Feb; 59(1):e14215. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14215.
Keywords: Surgery, Orthopedics, Medicare, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Social Determinants of Health