National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Communication (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (3)
- Falls (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Hospital Discharge (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Implementation (2)
- Injuries and Wounds (1)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Medication (1)
- Medication: Safety (1)
- Neurological Disorders (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient Safety (2)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (2)
- Provider: Health Personnel (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Quality Improvement (2)
- Quality of Care (2)
- Risk (1)
- Rural Health (1)
- Shared Decision Making (2)
- (-) Tools & Toolkits (6)
- Workflow (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedSchnipper JL, Reyes Nieva H, Mallouk M
Effects of a refined evidence-based toolkit and mentored implementation on medication reconciliation at 18 hospitals: results of the MARQUIS2 study.
This study was a follow-up of the first Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS1) that demonstrated mentored implementation of a medication reconciliation best practices toolkit. The toolkit decreased total unintentional medication discrepancies in five hospitals, but results varied by site. The toolkit has been refined with lessons learned and retooled as MARQUIS2. The tool was implemented at 18 North American hospitals or hospital systems from 2016 to 2018, offering 17 system-level and 6-patient-level interventions. One of eight physicians coached each site remotely via monthly calls and one or two site visits. A total of 4947 patients were sampled, with 1229 preimplementation and 3718 postimplementation. A steady decline in medication discrepancy rates were experienced from 2.85 discrepancies per patient down to 0.98 discrepancies. An interrupted time series analysis of the 17 sites showed the intervention was associated with a 5% relative decrease in discrepancies per month.
AHRQ-funded; HS025486; HS023757.
Citation: Schnipper JL, Reyes Nieva H, Mallouk M .
Effects of a refined evidence-based toolkit and mentored implementation on medication reconciliation at 18 hospitals: results of the MARQUIS2 study.
BMJ Qual Saf 2022 Apr;31(4):278-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012709..
Keywords: Medication, Evidence-Based Practice, Tools & Toolkits, Implementation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety
Ganiats TG, Bierman AS
AHRQ Author: Ganiats TG, Bierman AS
AHRQ's tools for better practice: helping family physicians manage today's challenges.
AHRQ is engaged in the dissemination and widespread implementation of what works in primary care. The agency’s main point of contact with the primary care community is the National Center for Excellence in Primary Care Research (NCEPCR). The authors discuss the variety of tools and resources made available by the NCEPCR.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Ganiats TG, Bierman AS .
AHRQ's tools for better practice: helping family physicians manage today's challenges.
Am Fam Physician 2017 Nov 1;96(9):569-70.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Evidence-Based Practice, Provider: Physician, Primary Care, Tools & Toolkits
Holland DE, Brandt C, Targonski PV
Validating performance of a hospital discharge planning decision tool in community hospitals.
The researchers aimed to determine the predictive performance of the Early Screen for Discharge Planning (ESDP) in a rural regional community hospital practice setting. Patients with high ESDP scores reported more problems after discharge, reported lower quality of life, had longer length of stays, and used post-acute care services more than patients with low ESDP scores.
AHRQ-funded; HS022923.
Citation: Holland DE, Brandt C, Targonski PV .
Validating performance of a hospital discharge planning decision tool in community hospitals.
Prof Case Manag 2017 Sep/Oct;22(5):204-13. doi: 10.1097/ncm.0000000000000233.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Hospital Discharge, Outcomes, Rural Health, Tools & Toolkits
Dykes PC, Duckworth M, Cunningham S
Pilot testing Fall TIPS (Tailoring Interventions for Patient Safety): a patient-centered fall prevention toolkit.
Patient falls during an acute hospitalization cause injury, reduced mobility, and increased costs. The laminated paper Fall TIPS Toolkit (Fall TIPS) provides clinical decision support at the bedside by linking each patient's fall risk assessment with evidence-based interventions. The investigators examined strategies to integrate this evidence into clinical practice. They concluded that engaging hospital and clinical leadership is critical in translating evidence-based care into clinical practice. They address and detail barriers to adoption of the protocol to provide guidance for spread to other institutions.
AHRQ-funded; HS025128.
Citation: Dykes PC, Duckworth M, Cunningham S .
Pilot testing Fall TIPS (Tailoring Interventions for Patient Safety): a patient-centered fall prevention toolkit.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2017 Aug;43(8):403-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.05.002..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Falls, Hospitals, Injuries and Wounds, Inpatient Care, Patient Safety, Prevention, Risk, Tools & Toolkits
Davis MM, Howk S, Spurlock M
A qualitative study of clinic and community member perspectives on intervention toolkits: "unless the toolkit is used it won't help solve the problem.".
Researchers conducted this study to explore what clinic and community-based users want in intervention toolkits and to identify the factors that support application in practice. They found that participants wanted toolkits targeted at the right audience and demonstrated to be effective. Well organized toolkits, often with a quick start guide, with tools that were easy to tailor and apply were desired.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Davis MM, Howk S, Spurlock M .
A qualitative study of clinic and community member perspectives on intervention toolkits: "unless the toolkit is used it won't help solve the problem.".
BMC Health Serv Res 2017 Jul 18;17(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2413-y.
.
.
Keywords: Provider: Health Personnel, Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Primary Care, Tools & Toolkits, Implementation
Narayanan J, Dobrin S, Choi J
Structured clinical documentation in the electronic medical record to improve quality and to support practice-based research in epilepsy.
The researchers describe a stepwise process for building structured clinical documentation support tools in the electronic medical record (EMR) that define best practices in epilepsy, and describe how they incorporated these toolkits into their clinical workflow. These tools write notes and capture hundreds of fields of data including several score tests. They also summarize brain imaging, blood laboratory, and electroencephalography results, and document neuromodulation treatments.
AHRQ-funded; HS024057.
Citation: Narayanan J, Dobrin S, Choi J .
Structured clinical documentation in the electronic medical record to improve quality and to support practice-based research in epilepsy.
Epilepsia 2017 Jan;58(1):68-76. doi: 10.1111/epi.13607.
.
.
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Neurological Disorders, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Tools & Toolkits, Workflow