National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedPaddock SM, Damberg CL, Yanagihara D
What role does efficiency play in understanding the relationship between cost and quality in physician organizations?
Previous studies demonstrate overuse of a narrow set of services, suggesting provider inefficiency, but existing studies neither quantify inefficiency more broadly nor assess its variation across physician organizations (POs). This study found that POs had substantial variation in efficiency, producing widely differing levels of quality for the same cost.
AHRQ-funded; HS021860.
Citation: Paddock SM, Damberg CL, Yanagihara D .
What role does efficiency play in understanding the relationship between cost and quality in physician organizations?
Med Care 2017 Dec;55(12):1039-45. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000823.
.
.
Keywords: Practice Patterns, Healthcare Costs, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Payment, Provider Performance
Adams JL, Paddock SM
Misclassification risk of tier-based physician quality performance systems.
The authors estimated misclassification rates for two-category high-quality physician identification systems. They found that current methods for profiling physicians on quality may produce misleading results, and that misclassification is a policy-relevant measure of the potential impact of tiering on providers, payers, and patients. They concluded that quantifying misclassification rates should inform the construction of high-performance networks and quality improvement initiatives.
AHRQ-funded; HS021860.
Citation: Adams JL, Paddock SM .
Misclassification risk of tier-based physician quality performance systems.
Health Serv Res 2017 Aug;52(4):1277-96. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12561.
.
.
Keywords: Provider Performance, Quality of Care, Payment
Mendelson A, Kondo K, Damberg C
The effects of pay-for-performance programs on health, health care use, and processes of care: a systematic review.
This review updated and expanded a prior review examining the effects of P4P programs targeted at the physician, group, managerial, or institutional level on process-of-care and patient outcomes in ambulatory and inpatient settings. It found that pay-for-performance programs may be associated with improved processes of care in ambulatory settings, but consistently positive associations with improved health outcomes have not been demonstrated in any setting.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Mendelson A, Kondo K, Damberg C .
The effects of pay-for-performance programs on health, health care use, and processes of care: a systematic review.
Ann Intern Med 2017 Mar 7;166(5):341-53. doi: 10.7326/m16-1881.
.
.
Keywords: Payment, Provider Performance, Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Care