National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (1)
- Adverse Events (1)
- Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (5)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Care Coordination (1)
- (-) Colonoscopy (10)
- Disparities (2)
- Guidelines (1)
- Healthcare Costs (3)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Healthcare Utilization (1)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (1)
- Medicare (3)
- Medication (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (1)
- Payment (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (1)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Screening (7)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- Social Determinants of Health (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 10 of 10 Research Studies DisplayedDavis MM, Gunn R, Pham R
Key collaborative factors when Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations work with primary care clinics to improve colorectal cancer screening: relationships, data, and quality improvement infrastructure.
This study focused on ways that Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are implementing interventions with primary care clinics to improve colorectal cancer screening. The researchers conducted a comparative case study of 14 Medicaid ACOs in Oregon and their contracted primary care clinics. They focused on interventions that reduced structural barriers (12 ACOs), delivered provider assessment and feedback (11 ACOs), and provided patient reminders (7 ACOs). There was an unintended consequence of potential exclusion of smaller clinics and metric focus and fatigue.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Davis MM, Gunn R, Pham R .
Key collaborative factors when Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations work with primary care clinics to improve colorectal cancer screening: relationships, data, and quality improvement infrastructure.
Prev Chronic Dis 2019 Aug 15;16:E107. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180395..
Keywords: Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Screening, Colonoscopy, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Care Coordination, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Song LD, Newhouse JP, Garcia-De-Albeniz X
Changes in screening colonoscopy following Medicare reimbursement and cost-sharing changes.
This study examined changes in screening colonoscopy rates after Medicare reimbursement and cost-sharing changed when the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was implemented. A 20% random sample of fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare claims from 2002-2012 was used in this study. Screening colonoscopy rates did increase after 2001 when cost-sharing was eliminated but the amount varied depending on the algorithm used to classify the indication.
AHRQ-funded; HS023128.
Citation: Song LD, Newhouse JP, Garcia-De-Albeniz X .
Changes in screening colonoscopy following Medicare reimbursement and cost-sharing changes.
Health Serv Res 2019 Aug;54(4):839-50. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13150..
Keywords: Colonoscopy, Healthcare Costs, Healthcare Utilization, Medicare, Payment, Prevention, Screening
Aouad M, Brown TT, Whaley CM
Reference pricing: the case of screening colonoscopies.
In this study, the investigators studied the introduction of reference pricing to the California Public Employees' Retirement System. The investigators found a 10 percentage point increase in the share of patients using an ambulatory surgery center (ASC), leading to a $2300 to $1700 reduction in prices paid for patients who switched to ASCs. They indicated that their results suggested the use of ASCs had a causal effect on prices paid and had no negative effect on patient health outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS022098.
Citation: Aouad M, Brown TT, Whaley CM .
Reference pricing: the case of screening colonoscopies.
J Health Econ 2019 May;65:246-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.03.002..
Keywords: Colonoscopy, Shared Decision Making, Health Services Research (HSR), Healthcare Costs, Healthcare Delivery, Screening
Mobley LR, Kuo TM, Zhou M
What happened to disparities in CRC screening among FFS Medicare enrollees following Medicare modernization?
This study examined the effects of the change in policy for colorectal screening that was implemented in 2006 for FFS Medicare beneficiaries. This new policy eliminated copayments for colonoscopies or sigmoidoscopies. Disparities in screening by race (Blacks, Asians and Hispanics relative to Whites), and gender (Males relative to Females). The time periods 2001-2005 and 2006-2009 were compared and while there was some improvement in screening rates for minorities and women, the progress was unevenly distributed across the USA.
AHRQ-funded; HS021752.
Citation: Mobley LR, Kuo TM, Zhou M .
What happened to disparities in CRC screening among FFS Medicare enrollees following Medicare modernization?
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2019 Apr;6(2):273-91. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-0522-x..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Colonoscopy, Disparities, Medicare, Screening
Robinson JC, Brown TT, Whaley C
Association of reference payment for colonoscopy with consumer choices, insurer spending, and procedural complications.
The researchers ascertained the effect of reference payment on facility choice, insurer spending, consumer cost sharing, and procedural complications for colonoscopy. They concluded that Implementation of reference payment for colonoscopy was associated with reduced spending and no change in complications.
AHRQ-funded; HS022098.
Citation: Robinson JC, Brown TT, Whaley C .
Association of reference payment for colonoscopy with consumer choices, insurer spending, and procedural complications.
JAMA Intern Med 2015 Nov;175(11):1783-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4588..
Keywords: Colonoscopy, Healthcare Costs, Adverse Events, Health Insurance
Liu H, Mattke S, Predmore ZS
Medicare coverage of anesthesia services during screening colonoscopies for patients at low risk of sedation-related complications.
The authors examined the costs and potential benefit of the Medicare rule change that waived patient cost sharing for anesthesia services during screening colonoscopies. Their results cast doubt on the value associated with Medicare coverage of anesthesia services during screening colonoscopies for patients at low risk of sedation-related complications. They recommended that payers create payment bundles for endoscopy procedures that include anesthesia services in a fixed fee.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: Liu H, Mattke S, Predmore ZS .
Medicare coverage of anesthesia services during screening colonoscopies for patients at low risk of sedation-related complications.
JAMA Intern Med 2015 Nov;175(11):1848-50. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4585.
.
.
Keywords: Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Colonoscopy, Medicare, Medication
Kahn B, Freeland Z, Gopal P
Predictors of guideline concordance for surveillance colonoscopy recommendations in patients at a safety-net health system.
The aim of this study was to quantify and identify predictors for guideline-concordant surveillance recommendations after adenoma polypectomy. It found that underuse recommendations were more likely in patients with C3 adenomas; overuse recommendations were more likely in patients with high-grade dysplasia or fair prep quality and less likely in those with piecemeal resection, C3 adenomas, age>65, or Hispanic ethnicity.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Kahn B, Freeland Z, Gopal P .
Predictors of guideline concordance for surveillance colonoscopy recommendations in patients at a safety-net health system.
Cancer Causes Control 2015 Nov;26(11):1653-60. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0661-x..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Colonoscopy, Guidelines, Patient Adherence/Compliance, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Berkowitz SA, Percac-Lima S, Ashburner JM
Building equity improvement into quality improvement: reducing socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer screening as part of population health management.
The aim of this study was to determine if implementation of a system-wide screening intervention could reduce disparities in the setting of improved overall screening rates. It found that a multifaceted population management intervention sensitive to the needs of vulnerable patients modestly narrowed disparities in colorectal cancer screening, while also increasing overall screening rates.
AHRQ-funded; HS018161.
Citation: Berkowitz SA, Percac-Lima S, Ashburner JM .
Building equity improvement into quality improvement: reducing socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer screening as part of population health management.
J Gen Intern Med 2015 Jul;30(7):942-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3227-4..
Keywords: Disparities, Screening, Social Determinants of Health, Colonoscopy
Elstad EA, Sutkowi-Hemstreet A, Sheridan SL
Clinicians' perceptions of the benefits and harms of prostate and colorectal cancer screening.
The researchers sought to understand clinicians’ perceptions of the benefits and harms of two screening tests (colonoscopy and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing) that differ in their balance of potential benefits and harms. Clinicians perceived PSA testing to have a greater likelihood of harm as well as a lower likelihood of lengthening life relative to colonoscopy.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032; HS021133
Citation: Elstad EA, Sutkowi-Hemstreet A, Sheridan SL .
Clinicians' perceptions of the benefits and harms of prostate and colorectal cancer screening.
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):467-76. doi: 10.1177/0272989x15569780..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Colonoscopy, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Screening
Burkholder GA, Tamhane AR, Appell LE
Short communication: Viral suppression is associated with increased likelihood of colorectal cancer screening among persons living with HIV/AIDS.
This retrospective longitudinal study evaluated patient characteristics associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in an HIV cohort. During a median follow-up time of 1.7 years, only 30 percent of patients underwent CRC screening. The majority of screened patients received endoscopic screening (colonoscopy, 86 percent; sigmoidoscopy, 8 percent); results were available for 68 of the 75 patients, and adenomatous polyps were found in 13 percent. No cases of CRC were reported.
AHRQ-funded; HS013852.
Citation: Burkholder GA, Tamhane AR, Appell LE .
Short communication: Viral suppression is associated with increased likelihood of colorectal cancer screening among persons living with HIV/AIDS.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2015 May;31(5):519-24. doi: 10.1089/aid.2014.0256..
Keywords: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Screening, Colonoscopy