National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Communication (1)
- (-) Diagnostic Safety and Quality (4)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Eye Disease and Health (1)
- Imaging (1)
- Medical Errors (1)
- Patient Safety (1)
- (-) Primary Care (4)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Screening (1)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedMeyer AN, Murphy DR, Singh H
Communicating findings of delayed diagnostic evaluation to primary care providers.
In this study, researchers examined the effectiveness of various communication strategies to inform primary care practitioners (PCPs) about the delayed follow-up of cancer-related abnormal or "red-flag" findings. They found that strategies (emails, phone calls, contacting clinic directors) to communicate to PCPs information on delayed follow-up of findings suspicious for cancer were useful, but not fail-safe.
AHRQ-funded; HS022901.
Citation: Meyer AN, Murphy DR, Singh H .
Communicating findings of delayed diagnostic evaluation to primary care providers.
J Am Board Fam Med 2016 Jul-Aug;29(4):469-73. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.150363.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Communication, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Primary Care
Al-Mutairi A, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ
Accuracy of the safer Dx instrument to identify diagnostic errors in primary care.
The researchers aimed to test the accuracy of an instrument to help detect presence or absence of diagnostic error through record reviews. They found that their Safer Dx Instrument helped quantify the likelihood of diagnostic error in primary care visits, achieving a high degree of accuracy for measuring their presence or absence.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087.
Citation: Al-Mutairi A, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ .
Accuracy of the safer Dx instrument to identify diagnostic errors in primary care.
J Gen Intern Med 2016 Jun;31(6):602-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3601-x.
.
.
Keywords: Primary Care, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement
Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C
Screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
This update of a 2009 systematic review on screening for impaired visual acuity among older adults found that new evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of visual acuity screening tests was limited and consistent with previous findings that screening questions or a visual acuity test was associated with suboptimal accuracy. Direct evidence found no significant difference between vision screening in older adults in primary care settings vs no screening for improving visual acuity or other clinical outcomes.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C .
Screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2016 Mar 1;315(9):915-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0783.
.
.
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Evidence-Based Practice, Eye Disease and Health, Primary Care, Screening, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Ladapo JA, Blecker S, Douglas PS
Appropriateness of cardiac stress test use among primary care physicians and cardiologists in the United States.
In this study, the researchers used nationally-representative data to examine differences in appropriate use of cardiac stress testing between cardiologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) in the US. Using permissive criteria to determine appropriateness, they found that primary care physicians are more likely to order or perform a rarely appropriate cardiac stress test than cardiologists.
AHRQ-funded; HS023683.
Citation: Ladapo JA, Blecker S, Douglas PS .
Appropriateness of cardiac stress test use among primary care physicians and cardiologists in the United States.
Int J Cardiol 2016 Jan 15;203:584-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.238.
.
.
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Imaging, Primary Care, Shared Decision Making