National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedGordon HS, Street RL
How physicians, patients, and observers compare on the use of qualitative and quantitative measures of physician-patient communication.
The purpose of this study was to compare several different measures of physician-patient communication. Communication was measured with rating scales completed by patients and physicians and by two groups of external observers who used rating scales or coded the frequency of communication behaviors. The findings highlight the potential for using observers' ratings as an alternate measure of communication to more labor intensive frequency measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS010876.
Citation: Gordon HS, Street RL .
How physicians, patients, and observers compare on the use of qualitative and quantitative measures of physician-patient communication.
Eval Health Prof 2016 Dec;39(4):496-511. doi: 10.1177/0163278715625737.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Gulbrandsen P, Clayman ML, Beach MC
Shared decision-making as an existential journey: aiming for restored autonomous capacity.
The researchers described the different ways in which illness represents an existential problem, and its implications for shared decision-making. They found that the fundamental uncertainty, state of vulnerability, and lack of power of the ill patient, imbue shared decision-making with a deeper existential significance and call for greater attention to the emotional and relational dimensions of care. They propose that the aim of shared decision-making should be restoration of the patient's autonomous capacity.
AHRQ-funded; HS022932.
Citation: Gulbrandsen P, Clayman ML, Beach MC .
Shared decision-making as an existential journey: aiming for restored autonomous capacity.
Patient Educ Couns 2016 Sep;99(9):1505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.014.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
The researchers identified patient-centered communication strategies/gaps for discussing Oncotype DX testing (ODX) results. They applied a patient-centered communication framework to analyze qualitative interviews with oncologists about how they communicate about ODX with patients. Overall, providers discussed four patient-centered communication domains: exchanging information, assessing uncertainty, making decisions and cross-cutting themes.
AHRQ-funded; HS019468; HS022189.
Citation: Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M .
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
Cancer Invest 2016 May 27;34(5):205-12. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2016.1172637.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Communication, Clinician-Patient Communication, Shared Decision Making, Genetics, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Women
Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW
The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making.
The authors discuss a range of issues associated with shared decision making. They see it as a collaborative communication process between clinicians and patients that integrates the best evidence available with the patients’ values and preferences, to promote high-quality health care decisions.
AHRQ-funded; HS023000.
Citation: Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW .
The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making.
JAMA 2016 May 17;315(19):2063-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3070..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Traino HM, Nonterah CW, Gupta G
Living kidney donors' information needs and preferences.
The purpose of this study was to assess donors' perceptions of the information provided while considering living donation. The study revealed limited usefulness of certain CMS-mandated topics and a desire for additional information about donation. Efforts to standardize the informed consent process should incorporate donors' perspectives as to the specific topics, quantity of information, and the mode of communication found most useful when considering living donation.
AHRQ-funded; HS018113; HS021312.
Citation: Traino HM, Nonterah CW, Gupta G .
Living kidney donors' information needs and preferences.
Prog Transplant 2016 Mar;26(1):47-54. doi: 10.1177/1526924816633943.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Transplantation