National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (6)
- Arthritis (2)
- Asthma (2)
- Behavioral Health (3)
- Cancer (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (3)
- Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) (1)
- Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) (1)
- Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) (4)
- Children/Adolescents (20)
- Chronic Conditions (6)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (2)
- Communication (2)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (5)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Critical Care (2)
- Cultural Competence (1)
- Dental and Oral Health (1)
- Depression (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (8)
- Disparities (2)
- Elderly (3)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (3)
- Emergency Department (4)
- Evidence-Based Practice (4)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (3)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (5)
- Healthcare Costs (2)
- Healthcare Delivery (4)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (7)
- Health Systems (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Home Healthcare (2)
- Hospital Discharge (1)
- Hospitalization (2)
- Hospital Readmissions (1)
- Hospitals (14)
- Implementation (5)
- Infectious Diseases (2)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (2)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Long-Term Care (4)
- Medicaid (6)
- Medical Errors (4)
- Medicare (5)
- Medication (3)
- Medication: Safety (1)
- Mortality (1)
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (1)
- Newborns/Infants (1)
- Nursing Homes (3)
- Obesity (1)
- Obesity: Weight Management (1)
- Outcomes (2)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (2)
- Patient Experience (4)
- Patient Safety (15)
- Payment (5)
- Policy (1)
- Practice Improvement (4)
- Practice Patterns (2)
- Pressure Ulcers (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (8)
- Provider: Pharmacist (1)
- Provider Performance (7)
- Quality Improvement (43)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (17)
- Quality Measures (28)
- (-) Quality of Care (80)
- Quality of Life (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (2)
- Registries (2)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (2)
- Risk (2)
- Sepsis (1)
- Sickle Cell Disease (1)
- Social Determinants of Health (2)
- Surgery (7)
- Telehealth (3)
- Tools & Toolkits (1)
- Transitions of Care (1)
- Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (2)
- Workflow (1)
- Workforce (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 80 Research Studies DisplayedAuerbach AD, Lee TM, Hubbard CC
Diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who died or were transferred to intensive care.
The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the prevalence, underlying causes, and harms of diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who were transferred to an intensive care unit or who died. Data was taken from 29 academic medical centers in the U.S. in a random sample of adults hospitalized with general medical conditions. Errors were found to have contributed to temporary harm, permanent harm, or death in nearly 18% of patients; among patients who died, diagnostic error was judged to have contributed to death in 6.6% of cases. The researchers noted that problems with choosing and interpreting tests and the processes involved with clinician assessment were a high priority for improvement efforts.
AHRQ-funded; HS027369.
Citation: Auerbach AD, Lee TM, Hubbard CC .
Diagnostic errors in hospitalized adults who died or were transferred to intensive care.
JAMA Intern Med 2024 Feb; 184(2):164-73. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7347..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Hospitals, Inpatient Care, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Adverse Events
Dalal AK, Schnipper JL, Raffel K
Identifying and classifying diagnostic errors in acute care across hospitals: early lessons from the Utility of Predictive Systems in Diagnostic Errors (UPSIDE) study.
This paper describes the Utility of Predictive Systems in Diagnostic Errors (UPSIDE) study, whose aim was to define the prevalence and underlying causes of diagnostic errors (DEs) in patients who die in the hospital or are transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) after the first 48 hours. This study was conducted at 31 hospitals with more than 2500 cases reviewed using electronic health records. The authors identified some insights into key requirements into building a robust DE surveillance program by developing these steps: 1) Develop a shared understanding of what constitutes a diagnostic error; 2) Use validated tools to identify diagnostic errors and classify process failures, but respect your context; 3) Develop a standard approach to using electronic health records for case reviews; 4) Ensure reliability and consistency of the case review process; and 5) Link diagnostic error case reviews to institutional safety programs. They also developed steps to establish a diagnosis error review process at the hospital level with six processes.
AHRQ-funded; HS027369; HS026613.
Citation: Dalal AK, Schnipper JL, Raffel K .
Identifying and classifying diagnostic errors in acute care across hospitals: early lessons from the Utility of Predictive Systems in Diagnostic Errors (UPSIDE) study.
J Hosp Med 2024 Feb; 19(2):140-45. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13136..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Hospitals
Ali KJ, Goeschel CA, DeLia DM
The PRIDx framework to engage payers in reducing diagnostic errors in healthcare.
The authors conducted a literature review and interviewed subject matter experts to develop a multi-component Payer Relationships for Improving Diagnoses (PRIDx) framework. The PRIDx framework can be used to encourage public and private payers to take specific actions to improve diagnostic safety. The authors noted that implementation of the PRIDx framework will require new types of partnerships, including external support from public and private payer organizations, and also require the creation of strong provider incentives.
AHRQ-funded; 2332015000221.
Citation: Ali KJ, Goeschel CA, DeLia DM .
The PRIDx framework to engage payers in reducing diagnostic errors in healthcare.
https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37795579.
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Quality of Care, Patient Safety
Newman-Toker DE, Nassery N, Schaffer AC
Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA.
Americans who experience serious harm from misdiagnosis annually. Serious harm is defined as permanent morbidity or morality. This cross-sectional analysis used nationally representative observational data. The authors estimated annual incident vascular events and infections from 21.5 million (M) sampled US hospital discharges (2012-2014). US-based cancer registries were used to find annual new cancers. They derived diagnostic errors and serious harms by multiplying by literature-based rates for disease-specific incidences for 15 major vascular events, infections and cancers ('Big Three' categories). Extrapolating to all diseases (including non-'Big Three' dangerous disease categories), they estimated total serious harms annually in the USA to be 795,000 (plausible range 598,000-1,023,000). Using more conservative assumptions they estimated 549,000 serious harms. These results were compatible with setting-specific serious harm estimates from inpatient, emergency department and ambulatory care. Fifteen dangerous diseases accounted for 50.7% of total serious harms and the top 5 (stroke, sepsis, pneumonia, venous thromboembolism and lung cancer) accounted for 38.7%.
AHRQ-funded; HS027614; HS029350.
Citation: Newman-Toker DE, Nassery N, Schaffer AC .
Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA.
BMJ Qual Saf 2024 Jan 19; 33(2):109-20. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130..
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Adverse Events
Li J
Home health agencies with high quality of patient care star ratings reduced short-term hospitalization rates and increased days independently at home.
Accurate Medicare Quality of Patient Care home health star ratings are crucial to helping patients find high-quality care, yet critics of these ratings indicate that they are not valid. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess whether using the highest-rated home health agency available in a ZIP code improves outcomes. The researchers included 1,870,080 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries using home health care from July 2015 through July 2016 in the United States. The study found that treatment by the highest-rated agencies available decreased risks of hospitalization, emergency department use, and institutionalization during the initial episode, and increased days independently at home by 2.6% or 3.75 days in the 180 days after the end of the initial episode. Treatment effects were stronger for agencies that were above-average, had 1 or more stars than the next-best agency, and nonrural residents. Effects were positive for both postacute and community-entry patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS026836.
Citation: Li J .
Home health agencies with high quality of patient care star ratings reduced short-term hospitalization rates and increased days independently at home.
Med Care 2024 Jan; 62(1):11-20. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001930..
Keywords: Home Healthcare, Quality of Care, Hospitalization, Provider Performance
Liao JM, Wang E, Isidro U
The association between bundled payment participation and changes in medical episode outcomes among high-risk patients.
This research evaluated whether the association between participation in bundled payments for medical conditions and episode outcomes differed for clinically high-risk versus other patients in regard to length of stay (LOS) at skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Participants included 471,421 Medicare patients hospitalized at bundled payment and propensity-matched non-participating hospitals. Primary outcomes were SNF LOS and 90-day unplanned readmissions. SNF length of stay was differentially lower among frail patients, patients with advanced age (>85 years), and those with prior institutional post-acute care provider utilization compared to non-frail, younger, and patients without prior utilization, respectively. Bundled payment participation was also associated with differentially greater SNF LOS among disabled patients. It was not associated with differential changes in readmissions in any high-risk group but was associated with changes in quality, utilization, and spending measures for some groups.
AHRQ-funded; HS027595.
Citation: Liao JM, Wang E, Isidro U .
The association between bundled payment participation and changes in medical episode outcomes among high-risk patients.
Healthcare 2022 Dec 12; 10(12). doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122510..
Keywords: Payment, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Risk, Policy
Collins CR, Abel MK, Shui A
Preparing for participation in the centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' bundle care payment initiative-advanced for major bowel surgery.
This study aimed to assess where the largest opportunities for care improvement lay with the bundled payment reimbursement model and how best to identify patients at high risk of suffering costly complications, including hospital readmission. The authors used a cohort of patients from 2014 and 2016 who met inclusion criteria for the Major Bowel Bundled Payment Program and performed a cost analysis to identify opportunities for improved care efficiency. Using the results, they identified readmissions as a target for improvement and then assessed whether the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator (ACS NSQIP SRC) could accurately identify patients within the bundled payment population who were at high risk of readmission using a logistic regression model. Patients who were readmitted within 90-days post-surgery were 2.53 times more likely to be high-cost (>$60,000) then non-readmitted patients. However, the ACS NSQIP SRC did not accurately predict patients at high risk of readmission within the first 30 days post-surgery.
AHRQ-funded; HS024532.
Citation: Collins CR, Abel MK, Shui A .
Preparing for participation in the centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' bundle care payment initiative-advanced for major bowel surgery.
Perioper Med 2022 Dec 9;11(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00286-9..
Keywords: Provider Performance, Payment, Hospital Readmissions, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Surgery, Medicare, Medicaid
Liao JM, Huang Q, Wang E
Performance of physician groups and hospitals participating in bundled payments among Medicare beneficiaries.
This cohort study compared how physician group practices (PGPs) performed in bundled payments compared with hospitals. The authors used 2011 to 2018 Medicare claims data to compare the association of participants in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BCPI) initiative with episode outcomes. Primary outcome was 90-day total episode spending. The total sampled comprised data from 1,288,781 Medicare beneficiaries, of whom mean age was 76.2 years, 59.7% women, and 85.5% White, with 592,071 individuals receiving care from 6405 physicians in in BPCI-participating PGPs and 24,758 propensity-matched physicians in non-BPCI-participating PGPs. For PGPs, BPCI participation was associated with greater reductions in episode spending for surgical (difference, -$1648 to -$1088) but not for medical episodes (difference, -$410 to $206). Hospital participation in BPCI was associated with greater reductions in episode spending for both surgical ($1345 to -$675) and medical -$1139 to -$386) episodes.
AHRQ-funded; HS027595.
Citation: Liao JM, Huang Q, Wang E .
Performance of physician groups and hospitals participating in bundled payments among Medicare beneficiaries.
JAMA Health Forum 2022 Dec 2; 3(12):e224889. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4889..
Keywords: Provider Performance, Payment, Hospitals, Medicare, Quality of Care
Giardina TD, Hunte H, Hill MA
Defining diagnostic error: a scoping review to assess the impact of the National Academies' report improving diagnosis in Health Care.
This study looked at peer-reviewed published literature to explore how researchers operationalize the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine’s (NASEM) definition of diagnostic error that was defined in their 2015 publication “Improving Diagnosis in Health Care”. Published literature was identified from October 2015 to February 2021. The authors also conducted subject matter expert interviews. Of the 34 studies identified, 16 were analyzed and abstracted to determine how diagnostic error was operationalized and measured. Studies were grouped by four themes: epidemiology, patient focus, measurement/surveillance, and clinician focus. Nine studies identified used the NASM definition. Five of those studies also operationalized with existing definitions proposed before the NASEM report, four operationalized the components of the NASEM definition, and three studies operationalized error using existing definitions only. Subject matter experts concluded that the NASEM definition functions as a foundation for researchers to conceptualize diagnostic error.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500022I; HS027280; HS025474; HS027363.
Citation: Giardina TD, Hunte H, Hill MA .
Defining diagnostic error: a scoping review to assess the impact of the National Academies' report improving diagnosis in Health Care.
J Patient Saf 2022 Dec 1;18(8):770-78. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000999..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Quality of Care, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Healthcare Delivery
Bolte TB, Swanson MB, Kaldjian AM
Hospitals that report severe sepsis and septic shock bundle compliance have more structured sepsis performance improvement.
This study linked survey data on quality improvement (QI) practices from Iowa hospitals to severe sepsis/septic shock (SEP-1) performance data and mortality. All Iowa hospitals (100%) completed the survey. SEP-1 reporting hospitals were more likely to have sepsis QI practices, including reporting sepsis quality to providers (64% versus 38%) and using the case review process to develop sepsis care plans. Increased SEP-1 scores were not associated with sepsis QI practices. A sepsis registry was associated with decreased odds of being in the bottom quartile of sepsis mortality, and presence of a sepsis committee was associated with lower hospital-specific mortality.
AHRQ-funded; HS025753.
Citation: Bolte TB, Swanson MB, Kaldjian AM .
Hospitals that report severe sepsis and septic shock bundle compliance have more structured sepsis performance improvement.
J Patient Saf 2022 Dec 1;18(8):e1231-e36. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000001062..
Keywords: Sepsis, Hospitals, Quality Improvement, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality of Care
Cohen DJ, Balasubramanian BA, Lindner S
How does prior experience pay off in large-scale quality improvement initiatives?
This study’s goal was to examine the association of prior investment on the effectiveness of organizations delivering large-scale external support to improve primary care. A mixed-methods study was conducted with 7 EvidenceNOW grantees and their recruited primary practices (n = 1720). Data was analyzed on the grantees’ implementation of helping primary care practice improve (1) clinical quality, measured as practices' performance on Aspirin, Blood Pressure, Cholesterol, and Smoking (ABCS); and (2) practice capacity, measured using the Adaptive Reserve (AR) score and Change Process Capacity Questionnaire (CPCQ). Grantees with higher levels of prior experience with and investment in large-scale QI before EvidenceNOW recruited more geographically dispersed and diverse practices. They also had lower baseline ABCS performance (differences ranging from 2.8% for blood pressure to 41.5% for smoking), delivered more facilitation (mean=+20.3 hours), and made greater improvements in practices' QI capacity (CPCQ: +2.04) and smoking performance (+6.43%) than grantees with less experience. Having established networks of facilitators at the start of EvidenceNOW and leadership experienced in supporting this workforce explained their better recruitment, delivery of facilitation, and improvement in outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation: Cohen DJ, Balasubramanian BA, Lindner S .
How does prior experience pay off in large-scale quality improvement initiatives?
J Am Board Fam Med 2022 Dec; 35(6):1115-27. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.AP.220088..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Primary Care, Quality of Care
Richards JE, Yarborough BJH, Holden E
Implementation of suicide risk estimation analytics to support mental health care for quality improvement.
The purpose of this mixed-methods quality improvement study was to examine and describe the use of estimation analytics to enhance existing suicide prevention practices during routine mental health specialty engagements. The study found that during the 3.5 month observation period there were 4,789 patient engagements by 1939 patients. This included 161 engagements newly identified by suicide risk estimation analytics. The researchers reported that the engagement-based risk identifications did not consistently trigger additional suicide risk assessment as intended. During newly identified engagements: 57 patients reported frequent suicidal ideation and, as per preexisting workflow, 54 completed a Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS); 75 patients reported no or infrequent suicidal ideation, but only 10 completed a C-SSRS, per new workflow; 29 patients did not answer the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and only 1 patient completed a C-SSRS, per new workflow. The providers interviewed (n = 8) reported important implementation concerns, including 1) lack of follow-up, 2) electronic health record- (EHR-) related inefficiencies, and 3) reliability and accuracy of the trigger. The patients interviewed (n = 20) repeated concerns about reliability and accuracy of estimation analytics. In addition, providers described concerns about access to care and potential liability associated with known suicide risk. Patients repeated the provider concerns about access and reported fears about identification of suicide risk resulting in coercive care. The researchers conclude that this unique quality improvement study underscores important implications for health care organizations considering implementation of estimation analytics to support engagement-based identification of suicide risk.
AHRQ-funded; HS026369.
Citation: Richards JE, Yarborough BJH, Holden E .
Implementation of suicide risk estimation analytics to support mental health care for quality improvement.
JAMA Netw Open 2022 Dec;5(12):e2247195. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.47195..
Keywords: Behavioral Health, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Sikora A, Martin GS
Critical care pharmacists: improving care by increasing access to medication expertise.
This article discusses the shortage and need for critical care pharmacists in ICUs to improve care and prevent medication errors. There is a gap in critical care pharmacists with both low supply and low demand. Identifying the optimal patient:pharmacist ratio in the ICU is a key question. The authors discuss ways to reduce the gap by increasing the number of critical care pharmacy residency programs and including critical care pharmacists more in multidisciplinary rounds. The authors developed a toolkit for increasing critical care pharmacy services in five actionable steps and provide an annotated bibliography of key references.
AHRQ-funded; HS028485.
Citation: Sikora A, Martin GS .
Critical care pharmacists: improving care by increasing access to medication expertise.
Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022 Nov;19(11):1796-98. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202206-502VP..
Keywords: Provider: Pharmacist, Medication, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Critical Care
Krauss DM, Molefe A, Hung L
AHRQ Author: Henderson S, Miller M
Emergent themes from a quality improvement programme for CLABSI/CAUTI prevention in ICUs amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
In this study, researchers summarized themes for maintaining infection prevention activities learned from the implementation of a quality improvement (QI) program during the COVID-19 pandemic. They concluded that future shocks such as the pandemic must be anticipated, and the healthcare system must be resilient to the resulting disruptions to healthcare-associated infection prevention activities. Their study encountered four themes for successful maintenance of infection prevention activities during the current pandemic: the value of a pre-existing infection prevention infrastructure; a flexibility in approach; broad buy-in for maintaining QI programs; and the facilitation of idea-sharing.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500016I.
Citation: Krauss DM, Molefe A, Hung L .
Emergent themes from a quality improvement programme for CLABSI/CAUTI prevention in ICUs amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
BMJ Open Qual 2022 Nov;11(4):e001926. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001926..
Keywords: COVID-19, Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI), Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI), Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Prevention, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Infectious Diseases
Thompson MP, Yaser JM, Forrest A
Evaluating the feasibility of a statewide collaboration to improve cardiac rehabilitation participation: the Michigan Cardiac Rehab Network.
The purpose of this study as to assess the feasibility of the Michigan Cardiac Rehab Network to improve Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) participation. The researchers utilized Multipayer claims data from the Michigan Value Collaborative to identify 95 hospitals and 84 CR facilities and convene a multidisciplinary group of advisors. Three CR facilities were selected for virtual site visits to identify areas of success and barriers to improvement. The study found that 51% of hospitals provided interventional cardiology services and 35% provided cardiac surgical services. The multidisciplinary group of advisors was convened and represented a broad range of roles within 13 institutions. CR enrollment statewide among eligible admissions was 33.4%, with broad differences in CR performance measures among participating hospitals and eligible admissions. Virtual site visits highlighted successes in increasing CR participation but an array of barriers to participation associated with referrals, capacity and staffing constraints, and geographic and financial barriers.
AHRQ-funded; HS027830.
Citation: Thompson MP, Yaser JM, Forrest A .
Evaluating the feasibility of a statewide collaboration to improve cardiac rehabilitation participation: the Michigan Cardiac Rehab Network.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2022 Nov 1;42(6):e75-e81. doi: 10.1097/hcr.0000000000000706..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Rehabilitation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Campbell JI, Menzies D
Testing and scaling interventions to improve the tuberculosis infection care cascade.
The purpose of this study was to review and summarize current literature on barriers and solutions occurring within the tuberculosis (TB) infection care cascade, focusing on children in high- and low-burden settings, and obtaining data and information from studies on both children and adults. The researchers concluded that identifying and addressing gaps in the TB care cascade requires the utilization of tools both novel and long-standing, and will be facilitated by shared clinical practice with primary care providers, methods of quality improvement, and innovative study designs.
AHRQ-funded; HS000063.
Citation: Campbell JI, Menzies D .
Testing and scaling interventions to improve the tuberculosis infection care cascade.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2022 Oct 31;11(Suppl 3):S94-s100. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piac070..
Keywords: Respiratory Conditions, Infectious Diseases, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Kuzel AJ, Cuellar A, Nichols L
The EvidenceNOW practice support initiative: the Heart of Virginia Healthcare.
The purpose of this study was for The Heart of Virginia Health care (HVH) collaborative (one of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Evidence Now project’s 7 collaboratives) to test different ways to improve performance and outcomes on ABCS clinical quality measures (appropriate Aspirin use, Blood pressure control, Cholesterol control, and Smoking cessation counseling) within small primary care practices. The researchers recruited 264 eligible practices and randomized them to 3 cohorts in a stepped wedge design, with 173, utilizing 16 different EHRs, participated through the entire initiative. Trained coaches delivered the practice support curriculum to improve performance on the ABCS measures. The program included an initial kickoff meeting, 3 months of focused support, 9 months of continued support, and access to online materials and faculty. The intervention phase was shortened due to difficulty in recruiting a sufficient number of practices. The study found that the short HVH intervention had a small but statistically significant positive average effects on appropriate use of aspirin and other anti-thrombotics, small negative effects on blood pressure control, except for those practices which did not attend the kickoff, and small negative effects on smoking cessation counseling. The researchers concluded that the truncation of the intervention contributed to the lack of substantial improvements in the ABCS.
AHRQ-funded; HS023913.
Citation: Kuzel AJ, Cuellar A, Nichols L .
The EvidenceNOW practice support initiative: the Heart of Virginia Healthcare.
J Am Board Fam Med 2022 Oct 18;35(5):979-89. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.05.210021..
Keywords: Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Primary Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Healthcare Delivery
Chen Z, Gleason LJ, Sanghavi P
Accuracy of pressure ulcer events in US nursing home ratings.
This study investigated the accuracy of the government website Nursing Home Compare (NHC) pressure ulcer measures, which are chief indicators of nursing home patient safety. The authors identified hospital admissions for pressure ulcers and linked them to the nursing home-reported data at the patient level using Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who were nursing home residents between 2011 and 2017. Percentages of pressure ulcers that were appropriately reported by stage, long-stay versus short-stay status, and race was calculated. Reporting rates were low for both short-stay (70.2%) and long-stay (59.7%) for stage 2-4 pressure ulcer hospitalizations. Black residents experienced more severe pressure ulcers than White residents. Correlations between claims-based measures and NHC ratings were found to be poor.
AHRQ-funded; HS026957.
Citation: Chen Z, Gleason LJ, Sanghavi P .
Accuracy of pressure ulcer events in US nursing home ratings.
Med Care 2022 Oct;60(10):775-83. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001763.
AHRQ-funded; HS026957..
AHRQ-funded; HS026957..
Keywords: Elderly, Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Pressure Ulcers, Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Patient Safety
Quigley DD, Qureshi N, Palimaru A
Content and actionability of recommendations to providers after shadow coaching.
This paper examined the content of the recommendations given to shadow-coached providers aimed at improving provider-patient interactions, to characterize these recommendations, and to examine their actionability. Using CAHPS data, the study’s findings showed that patient experience surveys were effective at identifying where improvement is needed but are not always informative enough to instruct providers on how to modify and improve their interactions with patients. Analyzing the feedback given to coached providers as part of an effective shadow-coaching program provides details about implementation on shadow-coaching feedback.
AHRQ-funded; HS025920.
Citation: Quigley DD, Qureshi N, Palimaru A .
Content and actionability of recommendations to providers after shadow coaching.
Qual Manag Health Care 2022 Oct-Dec;31(4):199-209. doi: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000354..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Practice Improvement, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication
Carroll AR, Smith CM, Frazier SB
Designing and conducting scholarly quality improvement: a practical guide for improvers everywhere.
The purpose of this article was to assist quality improvement teams to disseminate their work more expansively through publication by providing methods that many journals want in QI articles with specific examples of published works cited throughout the article. The researchers present improvement frameworks that teams should identify and utilize as a basis throughout their projects. The researchers review critical elements of QI projects, such as the formation of teams, the development of a concise and clear purpose statement, definitions of measures, and other QI tools such as fishbone diagrams and Pareto charts. Lastly, the researchers emphasize the importance of analyzing data longitudinally to explore the impacts of plan-do-study-act cycles on data.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Carroll AR, Smith CM, Frazier SB .
Designing and conducting scholarly quality improvement: a practical guide for improvers everywhere.
Hosp Pediatr 2022 Oct; 12(10):e359-e63. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006717..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Bourgoin A, Balaban R, Hochman M
AHRQ Author: Perfetto D, Hogan EM
Improving quality and safety for patients after hospital discharge: primary care as the lead integrator in postdischarge care transitions.
The purpose of this study was to explain primary care-based transition workflow processes for hospitalized patients. The researchers conducted interviews with primary care thought leaders, staff at 9 primary care sites, community agency staff, and recently discharged patients. The researchers found that primary care postdischarge workflows vary across the different settings, rarely include communications with the patient or the inpatient team during the hospitalization and vary widely across settings. The researchers recommended the use of principles for primary care practices to encourage active participation in the full spectrum of postdischarge care, from admission through the first postdischarge visit to primary care.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500019I/HHSP23337002T.
Citation: Bourgoin A, Balaban R, Hochman M .
Improving quality and safety for patients after hospital discharge: primary care as the lead integrator in postdischarge care transitions.
J Ambul Care Manage 2022 Oct-Dec;45(4):310-20. doi: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000433..
Keywords: Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Hospital Discharge, Transitions of Care, Hospitals, Workflow
Hegland TA, Owens PL, Selden TM
AHRQ Author: Hegland TA, Owens PL, Selden TM
New evidence on geographic disparities in United States hospital capacity.
The purpose of this study was to describe hospital capacity across the United States. The researchers combined American Hospital Association Survey, Hospital Compare, and American Community Survey data with the 2017 near-census of U.S. hospital inpatient discharges from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). The study found that 0.11 more beds per 1000 population were supplied to zip codes where Non-Hispanic individuals live than zip codes where non-Hispanic White individuals live. However, the hospitals supplying this capacity have 0.36 fewer staff per bed and perform worse on many care quality measures. Zip codes in the most urban parts of America have the least hospital capacity (2.11 beds per 1000 persons) from across the rural-urban continuum. While more rural areas have higher capacity levels, urban areas have advantages in staff and capital per bed. The researchers did not find systematic differences in care quality between rural and urban areas. The study concluded that lower hospital care quality and resource intensity plays a key role in racial, ethnic, and income disparities in hospital care related outcomes.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Hegland TA, Owens PL, Selden TM .
New evidence on geographic disparities in United States hospital capacity.
Health Serv Res 2022 Oct;57(5):1006-19. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14010..
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Disparities, Hospitals, Quality of Care, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Bradford A, Shofer M, Singh H
AHRQ Author: Shofer M, Singh H
Measure Dx: implementing pathways to discover and learn from diagnostic errors.
This paper discusses Measure Dx, a new AHRQ resource that translates knowledge from diagnostic measurement research into actionable recommendations. This resource guides healthcare organizations to detect, analyze, and learn from diagnostic safety events as part of a continuous learning and feedback cycle. The goal of Measure Dx is to advance new frontiers in reducing preventable diagnostic harm to patients.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500022I; HS027363.
Citation: Bradford A, Shofer M, Singh H .
Measure Dx: implementing pathways to discover and learn from diagnostic errors.
Int J Qual Health Care 2022 Sep 10;34(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac068..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Health Systems, Learning Health Systems
Sweeney SM, Baron A, Hall JD
Effective facilitator strategies for supporting primary care practice change: a mixed methods study.
Investigators conducted a pragmatic qualitative study with patients who had participated in a health-related social needs (HRSN) intervention. They found that patients were likely to have initial skepticism or reservations about the intervention; they identified 4 positive intervention components regarding patient experience; and they found that patients could be left with feelings of appreciation or hope, regardless of whether they connected with HRSN resources.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation: Sweeney SM, Baron A, Hall JD .
Effective facilitator strategies for supporting primary care practice change: a mixed methods study.
Ann Fam Med 2022 Sep-Oct;20(5):414-22. doi: 10.1370/afm.2847..
Keywords: Primary Care, Practice Improvement, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Quigley D, Qureshi N, Rybowski L
AHRQ Author: Ginsberg C
Summary of the 2020 AHRQ research meeting on 'Advancing Methods of Implementing and Evaluating Patient experience improvement using consumer assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Surveys'.
The purpose of this AHRQ authored paper was to discuss the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality research meeting on using Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) data for quality improvement (QI). The author reports on 3 topics addressed, including: lessons learned about organizational factors/environment for improving patient experience; 2) organizational use of data to improve patient experience; and 3) information provided by evaluations utilizing CAHPS data and their use in implementing successful programs to improve patient experience. The author further identified key themes, including: Early and frequent engagement of providers and stakeholders, QI process standardization, complementing CAHPS data with other data, and compiling dashboards of CAHPS scores to identify and track improvement. The author concluded that much can be learned and achieved from organization-level studies.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS025920; HS016978.
Citation: Quigley D, Qureshi N, Rybowski L .
Summary of the 2020 AHRQ research meeting on 'Advancing Methods of Implementing and Evaluating Patient experience improvement using consumer assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Surveys'.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2022 Sep;22(6):883-90. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2064848..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Experience