National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedHuff NR, Liu G, Chimowitz H
COVID-19 related negative emotions and emotional suppression are associated with greater risk perceptions among emergency nurses: a cross-sectional study.
The objectives of this study were to investigate the relationship between emergency nurses' emotional experiences in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and their perceptions of risk to both patients and themselves, and also to investigate the extent to which the use of suppression and reappraisal processes for emotion management were associated with these perceptions. Nurses' negative emotions in response to the pandemic were associated with greater perceptions of both personal and patient safety risks. Chronic tendencies to suppress emotions uniquely predicted higher perceptions of risk. The authors concluded that understanding the factors that influence perceptions of risk are important, since these perceptions can motivate behaviors that may impact patient safety adversely.
AHRQ-funded; HS025752.
Citation: Huff NR, Liu G, Chimowitz H .
COVID-19 related negative emotions and emotional suppression are associated with greater risk perceptions among emergency nurses: a cross-sectional study.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv 2023 Dec; 5:100111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100111.
Keywords: COVID-19, Emergency Department, Provider: Nurse
Kilaru AS, Scheulen JJ, Harbertson CA
Boarding in US academic emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to characterize changes in emergency department (ED) boarding among U.S. academic EDs across the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. From January 2019 to December 2021 the researchers utilized a convenience sample of academic departments of emergency medicine to conduct an analysis of monthly data. The primary outcome was total boarding hours, and secondary outcomes included patient volume stratified by ED disposition. Of the 73 academic departments of emergency medicine contacted, 46.6% participated, a total of 43 individual EDs in 25 states. The study found that the adjusted mean total boarding hours per month were significantly lower during the second quarter of 2020 compared to the first quarter of 2019. Beginning in the second quarter of 2021, total boarding hours were significantly higher than pre-pandemic levels, peaking during the fourth quarter of 2021.
AHRQ-funded; HS026372.
Citation: Kilaru AS, Scheulen JJ, Harbertson CA .
Boarding in US academic emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ann Emerg Med 2023 Sep; 82(3):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.12.004..
Keywords: COVID-19, Emergency Department, Public Health
Jenkins JL, Hsu EB, Zhang A
Current evidence for infection prevention and control interventions in emergency medical services: a scoping review.
This study’s aim was to summarize current evidence from the United States on the effectiveness of practices and interventions for preventing, recognizing, and controlling occupationally acquired infectious diseases in Emergency Medical Service (EMS) clinicians. A database search was conducted for literature published January 2006 through March 15, 2022 to search for studies in the United States that involved EMS clinicians and firefighters, reported on one or more workplace practices or interventions that prevented or controlled infectious diseases, and included outcome measures. Eleven observational studies reported on infection prevention and control (IPC) practices providing evidence that hand hygiene, standard precautions, mandatory vaccine policies, and on-site vaccine clinics are effective. Less frequent handwashing and less frequent hand hygiene after glove use were positively correlated with nasal colonization of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) or PPE breach were correlated with higher severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seropositivity and virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seropositivity. Workers were more likely to be vaccinated against influenza if their employer offered the vaccine. Vaccination rates for H1N1 influenza increased with the use of active, targeted education modules.
AHRQ-funded; 75Q80120D00003.
Citation: Jenkins JL, Hsu EB, Zhang A .
Current evidence for infection prevention and control interventions in emergency medical services: a scoping review.
Prehosp Disaster Med 2023 Jun; 38(3):371-77. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x23000389..
Keywords: COVID-19, Emergency Department, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention, Public Health, Infectious Diseases
Prasad PA, Correia J, Fang MC
Performance of point-of-care severity scores to predict prognosis in patients admitted through the emergency department with COVID-19.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether sepsis risk stratification scores can predict poor outcomes among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The researchers retrospectively evaluated a cohort of adults presenting with COVID-19 to 156 Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) Healthcare emergency departments (Eds) from March 2, 2020, to February 11, 2021. The study administered the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Shock Index, National Early Warning System-2 (NEWS2), and quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI) at patient presentation. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors receipt. The study identified 90,376 patients with community-acquired COVID-19. 17.2% of patients died in-hospital, 28.6% went to the ICU, 13.7% received mechanical ventilation, and 13.6% received vasopressors. There were 3.8% qSOFA-positive, 45.1% Shock Index-positive, 49.8% NEWS2-positive, and 37.6% qCSI-positive at ED-triage. NEWS2 exhibited the highest AUROC for in-hospital mortality, followed by ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor receipt. The researchers concluded that sepsis severity scores at presentation have low discriminative power to predict outcomes in COVID-19 patients and are not reliable for clinical use.
AHRQ-funded; HS027369.
Citation: Prasad PA, Correia J, Fang MC .
Performance of point-of-care severity scores to predict prognosis in patients admitted through the emergency department with COVID-19.
J Hosp Med 2023 May; 18(5):413-23. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13106..
Keywords: COVID-19, Emergency Department, Diagnostic Safety and Quality