National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (2)
- Communication (1)
- (-) Data (9)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Health Systems (1)
- Home Healthcare (2)
- Infectious Diseases (1)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Nursing (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (3)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (3)
- Public Health (1)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (9)
- Transitions of Care (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 9 of 9 Research Studies DisplayedLin JS, Murad MH, Leas B
A narrative review and proposed framework for using health system data with systematic reviews to support decision-making.
This paper addresses when and how the use of health system data might make systematic reviews more useful to decisionmakers. The authors have developed a framework to guide the use of health system data alongside systematic reviews based on a narrative review of the literature and empirical experience. They recommend future methodological work on how best to handle internal and external validity concerns of health system data in the context of systematically reviewed data and work on developing infrastructure to do this type of work.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500007I; 29032001T05; 290201500005I; 290201500009I.
Citation: Lin JS, Murad MH, Leas B .
A narrative review and proposed framework for using health system data with systematic reviews to support decision-making.
J Gen Intern Med 2020 Jun;35(6):1830-35. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05783-5..
Keywords: Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Evidence-Based Practice, Data, Shared Decision Making
Yang Y, Bass EJ, Sockolow PS
Knowledge elicitation of homecare admission decision making processes via focus group, member checking and data visualization.
Researchers elicit knowledge related to expert decision-making processes to inform information technology design and related interventions. In this study, the investigators examine knowledge elicitation of homecare admission decision making processes via focus group, member checking and data visualization. The investigators concluded that the data collection and validation methodology showed promise for knowledge elicitation in time-constrained situations.
AHRQ-funded; HS024537.
Citation: Yang Y, Bass EJ, Sockolow PS .
Knowledge elicitation of homecare admission decision making processes via focus group, member checking and data visualization.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018 Dec 5;2018:1127-36..
Keywords: Home Healthcare, Shared Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Data
Sockolow PS, Yang Y, Bass EJ
Data visualization of home care admission nurses' decision-making.
This study investigated nurses’ decision making regarding hospital to home care admissions. They conducted a focus group case study with six admitting home health nurses at a rural agency in Pennsylvania and analyzed the data using thematic analysis.
AHRQ-funded; HS024537.
Citation: Sockolow PS, Yang Y, Bass EJ .
Data visualization of home care admission nurses' decision-making.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018 Apr 16;2017:1597-606..
Keywords: Data, Shared Decision Making, Home Healthcare, Nursing, Transitions of Care
Arcia A, Woollen J, Bakken S
A systematic method for exploring data attributes in preparation for designing tailored infographics of patient reported outcomes.
Tailored visualizations of patient reported outcomes (PROs) are valuable health communication tools to support shared decision making, health self-management, and engagement with research participants, such as cohorts in the NIH Precision Medicine Initiative. The authors of the study present a systematic method to exploring data attributes, with a specific focus on application to self-reported health data. They present two case studies to illustrate how this method affected design decisions particularly with respect to outlier and non-missing zero values.
AHRQ-funded; HS019853; HS022961.
Citation: Arcia A, Woollen J, Bakken S .
A systematic method for exploring data attributes in preparation for designing tailored infographics of patient reported outcomes.
eGEMS 2018 Jan 24;6(1):2. doi: 10.5334/egems.190..
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Data
LeRouge C, Hasselquist MB, Kellogg L
Using heuristic evaluation to enhance the visual display of a provider dashboard for patient-reported outcomes.
A human-centered design (HCD) approach to understanding the data visualization needs for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in clinical practice can optimize the visual design of an interactive PRO system. Beyond iterative methods, the authors explored the additive value of other HCD methods such as heuristic evaluation. Their evaluation led to several recommendations to improve the display, accessibility, and interpretability of the dashboard’s data.
AHRQ-funded; HS023785.
Citation: LeRouge C, Hasselquist MB, Kellogg L .
Using heuristic evaluation to enhance the visual display of a provider dashboard for patient-reported outcomes.
eGEMS 2017 Apr 20;5(2):Article 6. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1283.
.
.
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Information Technology (HIT), Data, Shared Decision Making
Roosan D, Samore M, Jones M
Big-data based decision-support systems to improve clinicians' cognition.
This study focused on answers from the experts on how clinical reasoning can be supported by population-based Big-Data. It found cognitive strategies such as trajectory tracking, perspective taking, and metacognition has the potential to improve clinicians' cognition to deal with complex problems. These cognitive strategies all have important implications for the design of Big-Data based decision-support tools that could be embedded in electronic health records.
AHRQ-funded; HS023349.
Citation: Roosan D, Samore M, Jones M .
Big-data based decision-support systems to improve clinicians' cognition.
IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform 2016;2016:285-88. doi: 10.1109/ichi.2016.39.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Data, Electronic Health Records (EHRs)
Roosan D, Del Fiol G, Butler J
Feasibility of population health analytics and data visualization for decision support in the infectious diseases domain: a pilot study.
The objectives of this study were: 1) to explore the feasibility of extracting and displaying population-based information from an actual clinical population's database records, 2) to explore specific design features for improving population display, 3) to explore perceptions of population information displays, and 4) to explore the impact of population information display on cognitive outcomes. It concluded that a population database has great potential for reducing complexity and uncertainty in medicine to improve clinical care.
AHRQ-funded; HS023349.
Citation: Roosan D, Del Fiol G, Butler J .
Feasibility of population health analytics and data visualization for decision support in the infectious diseases domain: a pilot study.
Appl Clin Inform 2016 Jun 29;7(2):604-23. doi: 10.4338/aci-2015-12-ra-0182.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Data, Shared Decision Making, Infectious Diseases, Public Health
Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, Pasupathy KS
Transforming healthcare delivery: integrating dynamic simulation modelling and big data in health economics and outcomes research.
The authors discussed the synergies between big data and dynamic simulation modelling (DSM), practical considerations and challenges, and how integrating big data and DSM can be useful to decision makers to address complex, systemic health economics and outcomes questions and to transform healthcare delivery.
AHRQ-funded; HS023710.
Citation: Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, Pasupathy KS .
Transforming healthcare delivery: integrating dynamic simulation modelling and big data in health economics and outcomes research.
Pharmacoeconomics 2016 Feb;34(2):115-26. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0330-7.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Shared Decision Making, Healthcare Delivery, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Hartling L, Guise JM, Kato E
AHRQ Author: Kato, E, Berliner E
A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts.
The researchers described characteristics of rapid reviews and examined the impact of methodological variations on their reliability and validity. They concluded that rapid products have tremendous methodological variation and that categorization based on timeframe or type of synthesis reveals patterns. The similarity across rapid products lies in the close relationship with the end user to meet time-sensitive decision-making needs.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201200013I; 290201200010I; 290201200011I; 290201200015I; 290201200007I; 290201200004C.
Citation: Hartling L, Guise JM, Kato E .
A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts.
J Clin Epidemiol 2015 Dec;68(12):1451-62.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.036.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Data, Research Methodologies