National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedLovero KL, Kemp CG, Wagenaar BH
Application of the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of strategies to health intervention implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
The authors conducted a systematic literature review on the use of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project strategies for health intervention implementation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in order to identify gaps and to inform future research. The results indicated that ERIC usage in LMICs is rapidly growing, but its application has not been consistently used to test strategy effectiveness. The authors recommended that future LMICs research test strategies need to be better specified, so they may be compared across contexts and their impact on outcomes evaluated.
AHRQ-funded; HS025632.
Citation: Lovero KL, Kemp CG, Wagenaar BH .
Application of the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of strategies to health intervention implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Implement Sci 2023 Oct 30; 18(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01310-2..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice
Kim B, Cruden G, Crable EL
A structured approach to applying systems analysis methods for examining implementation mechanisms.
This article delineated a structured approach to applying systems analysis methods to examining implementation mechanisms. This approach included steps for selecting, tailoring, and evaluating an implementation strategy. The authors illustrated the approach by using an example case, then discussed the strengths and limitations of this approach, when each step might be appropriate. They suggested work that might extend systems analysis methods to the implementation mechanisms research.
AHRQ-funded; HS025632.
Citation: Kim B, Cruden G, Crable EL .
A structured approach to applying systems analysis methods for examining implementation mechanisms.
Implement Sci Commun 2023 Oct 19; 4(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00504-5..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Systems
Tyler A, Jolles M
Methodological progress note: implementation science contributions to healthcare research and practice.
Existing research reflects that specific populations such as senior citizens, minorities, and rural Americans have proportionally less access to telehealth when compared to the average American. The purpose of this study was to explore specific strategies for overcoming barriers to telehealth access through an evaluation of data collected by a medical student-run telehealth education program. During the study period the researchers contacted 47 patients by telephone through the GET (Geriatric Education On Telehealth) Access Program. The study found 4 main themes during the discussions with patients, including: completion of registration steps, familiarity with accessing and using video conferencing software, attainment of proxy access for parents of a pediatric patient, and resolution of miscellaneous technical queries.
AHRQ-funded; HS026512.
Citation: Tyler A, Jolles M .
Methodological progress note: implementation science contributions to healthcare research and practice.
J Hosp Med 2023 Oct; 18(10):920-25. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13147..
Keywords: Implementation, Health Services Research (HSR), Evidence-Based Practice
Rizk S, Kaelin VC, Sim JGC
Implementing an electronic patient-reported outcome and decision support tool in early intervention.
The study’s aim was to identify and prioritize early intervention (EI) stakeholders' perspectives of supports and barriers to implementing the Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM), an electronic patient-reported outcome (e-PRO) tool, for scaling its implementation across multiple local and state EI programs. A mixed-methods study was conducted with EI families (n = 6), service coordinators (n = 9), and program leadership (n = 7). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted and used to share quantitative trial results. All three stakeholder groups identified thematic supports and barriers across multiple constructs within each of four Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains: (1) Six themes for "intervention characteristics," (2) Six themes for "process," (3) Three themes for "inner setting," and (4) Four themes for "outer setting." Priorities from stakeholders included prioritized reaching families with diverse linguistic preferences and user navigation needs, further tailoring its interface with automated data capture and exchange processes ("process"); and fostering a positive implementation climate ("inner setting"). Improving EI access (“outer setting”) using YC-PEM e-PRO results was also articulated by service coordinators and program leadership.
AHRQ-funded; HS027583.
Citation: Rizk S, Kaelin VC, Sim JGC .
Implementing an electronic patient-reported outcome and decision support tool in early intervention.
Appl Clin Inform 2023 Jan; 14(1):91-107. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760631..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Children/Adolescents, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Implementation