National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Diabetes (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (2)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (9)
- Guidelines (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Hospitalization (1)
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (1)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (5)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (9)
- (-) Patient and Family Engagement (9)
- Primary Care (1)
- Quality Improvement (2)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Research Methodologies (3)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- Teams (1)
- Training (1)
- Transitions of Care (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 9 of 9 Research Studies DisplayedNijhawan AE, Bhattatiry M, Chansard M
HIV care cascade before and after hospitalization: impact of a multidisciplinary inpatient team in the US South.
Hospitalization represents an opportunity to re-engage out-of-care individuals, improve HIV outcomes, and reduce health disparities. The authors reviewed electronic health records of HIV-positive individuals hospitalized at an urban, public hospital between September 2013 and December 2015. They found that hospitalized patients with HIV had low rates of engagement in care, retention in care, and virologic suppression, though all three outcomes improved after hospitalization. A multidisciplinary transitions team improved care engagement and virologic suppression in those who received the intervention.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Nijhawan AE, Bhattatiry M, Chansard M .
HIV care cascade before and after hospitalization: impact of a multidisciplinary inpatient team in the US South.
AIDS Care 2020 Nov;32(11):1343-52. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1698704.
.
.
Keywords: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Transitions of Care, Inpatient Care, Teams, Hospitalization, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Evidence-Based Practice
Byham-Gray LD, Peters EN, Rothpletz-Puglia P
Patient-centered model for protein-energy wasting: stakeholder deliberative panels.
Integrating the patient's voice into research prioritization is essential for solving problems that patients care the most about in terms of health, symptom management, and survival. In this study, the investigators used deliberative processes for adapting the existing model of protein-energy wasting (PEW) to one that included stakeholder priorities, addressing gaps from the initial concept.
AHRQ-funded; HS023434.
Citation: Byham-Gray LD, Peters EN, Rothpletz-Puglia P .
Patient-centered model for protein-energy wasting: stakeholder deliberative panels.
J Ren Nutr 2020 Mar;30(2):137-44. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2019.06.001..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient and Family Engagement, Research Methodologies
Ivlev I, Vander Ley KJ, Wiedrick J
Training patients to review scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: an observational study.
This observational study aimed to evaluate the effect of new training for patient peer reviewers of scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). A new online training in peer review was used to help change reviewers’ knowledge and skills and change self-efficacy and attitudes. Reviewers improved their answers to the knowledge questions. Median numbers of answers improved after the training, particularly in questions targeting the specifics of PCORI peer review. It modestly increased reviewers’ confidence in completing a high-quality peer review. Their excitement about providing a review slightly increased. All reviewers were satisfied with the training.
AHRQ-funded; HS026370.
Citation: Ivlev I, Vander Ley KJ, Wiedrick J .
Training patients to review scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: an observational study.
BMJ Open 2019 Sep;9(9):e028732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028732..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies, Patient and Family Engagement, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Training
Yanez B, Bouchard LC, Cella D
Patient-centered engagement and symptom/toxicity monitoring in the new era of tumor next-generation sequencing and immunotherapy: the OncoTool and OncoPRO platforms.
This paper describes the development of the OncoTool and OncoPRO platforms to help patients with late-stage cancer (stages III-IV) and their providers in providing patient-centered education and remote and routine monitoring of symptoms and toxicities after tumor next-generation sequencing testing and treatment. The OncoTool is a web-based educational resource tailored for people with advanced cancer. It aims to provide patients with easy-to-understand treatment options and associated toxicities as well as evidence-based strategies for managing symptoms and improving stress management. It is fully integrated with OncoPRO which provides feedback on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to clinicians. The data from the platform can be integrated with the patient’s electronic health record (HER) and can provide an alert message. These systems are currently being tested with 4 trials – 1 for OncoTool and the other 3 for OncoPRO.
AHRQ-funded; HS023011.
Citation: Yanez B, Bouchard LC, Cella D .
Patient-centered engagement and symptom/toxicity monitoring in the new era of tumor next-generation sequencing and immunotherapy: the OncoTool and OncoPRO platforms.
Cancer 2019 Jul 15;125(14):2338-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32030..
Keywords: Cancer, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Evidence-Based Practice, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient and Family Engagement
Hall TL, Knierim KE, Nease DE
Primary care practices' implementation of patient-team partnership: findings from EvidenceNOW Southwest.
The authors reported on practice characteristics associated with greater patient-team partnership scores. Using EvidenceNOW Southwest data, they found that practices can improve efforts to partner with patients to assess social needs, gather meaningful input on practice improvement and patient experience, and offer resource connections. These findings supplement recent evidence that patient registries and evidence-based guidelines may effectively prevent and manage cardiovascular disease.
AHRQ-funded; HS023904.
Citation: Hall TL, Knierim KE, Nease DE .
Primary care practices' implementation of patient-team partnership: findings from EvidenceNOW Southwest.
J Am Board Fam Med 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):490-504. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180361..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Clinician-Patient Communication, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient and Family Engagement, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Armstrong MJ, Mullins CD, Gronseth GS
Impact of patient involvement on clinical practice guideline development: a parallel group study.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of patient and public involvement (PPI) on guideline question formation and validate a conceptual model of patient and public contributions to guidelines. The qualitative analysis of the discussions occurring during guideline question development demonstrated key differences in group conduct and validated the proposed conceptual model of patient and public contributions to guidelines.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159; HS022135.
Citation: Armstrong MJ, Mullins CD, Gronseth GS .
Impact of patient involvement on clinical practice guideline development: a parallel group study.
Implement Sci 2018 Apr 16;13(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0745-6.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies
Armstrong MJ, Rueda JD, Gronseth GS
Framework for enhancing clinical practice guidelines through continuous patient engagement.
The authors propose a ten-step framework outlining steps and options for patient engagement in guideline development with the goal of highlighting steps for patient engagement and methods by which this can be achieved. This framework can serve as a resource for guideline developers desiring to increase patient engagement and reference for researchers investigating engagement methodology at different steps of the clinical practice guideline lifecycle.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159.
Citation: Armstrong MJ, Rueda JD, Gronseth GS .
Framework for enhancing clinical practice guidelines through continuous patient engagement.
Health Expect 2017 Feb;20(1):3-10. doi: 10.1111/hex.12467.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Improvement
Makam AN, Nguyen OK
An evidence-based medicine approach to antihyperglycemic therapy in diabetes mellitus to overcome overtreatment.
This article discusses the importance of (1) using absolute rather than relative estimates of benefits to inform treatment decisions; (2) considering the time horizon to benefit of treatments; (3) balancing potential harms and benefits; and (4) using shared decision making by physicians to incorporate the patient's values and preferences into treatment decisions.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Makam AN, Nguyen OK .
An evidence-based medicine approach to antihyperglycemic therapy in diabetes mellitus to overcome overtreatment.
Circulation 2017 Jan 10;135(2):180-95. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.116.022622.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Diabetes, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Lavallee DC, Wicks P, Alfonso Cristancho R
Stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: high-touch or high-tech?
In this article, the authors compared and contrasted high-tech and high-touch approaches to engaging stakeholders and suggested hybrid processes.
AHRQ-funded; HS022135; HS022959.
Citation: Lavallee DC, Wicks P, Alfonso Cristancho R .
Stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: high-touch or high-tech?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014 Jun;14(3):335-44. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.901890.
.
.
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement