National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 1 of 1 Research Studies DisplayedKondo KK, Damberg CL, Mendelson A
Implementation processes and pay for performance in healthcare: A systematic review.
The authors conducted a systematic review and key informant (KI) interviews to better understand the implementation factors that modify the effectiveness of pay for performance (P4P). They concluded that P4P programs should undergo regular evaluation and should target areas of poor performance, and also that measures and incentives should align with organizational priorities, and programs should allow for changes over time in response to data and provider input.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Kondo KK, Damberg CL, Mendelson A .
Implementation processes and pay for performance in healthcare: A systematic review.
J Gen Intern Med 2016 Apr;31 Suppl 1:61-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3567-0.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Provider Performance, Payment, Quality of Care