National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Adverse Events (5)
- (-) Children/Adolescents (9)
- Critical Care (3)
- (-) Diagnostic Safety and Quality (9)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Hospitals (2)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (3)
- (-) Medical Errors (9)
- Patient Safety (6)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (2)
- Quality Improvement (4)
- Quality of Care (3)
- Risk (1)
- Sepsis (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 9 of 9 Research Studies DisplayedCifra CL, Custer JW, Smith CM
Prevalence and characteristics of diagnostic error in pediatric critical care: a multicenter study.
This study’s objective was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of diagnostic errors and identify factors associated with error in patients admitted to the PICU. This multicenter cohort study used structured medical record review by trained clinicians using the Revised Safer Dx instrument to identify diagnostic error (defined as missed opportunities in diagnosis). The cohort included 882 randomly selected patients 0-18 years old who were nonelectively admitted to participating PICUs. Of these admissions, 13 (1.5%) had a diagnostic error up to 7 days after PICU admission, with infections (46%) and respiratory conditions (23%) being the most missed diagnoses. One diagnostic error caused a prolonged hospital stay. Common missed diagnostic opportunities included failure to consider the diagnosis despite a suggestive history and failure to broaden diagnostic testing, both at 69%. Unadjusted analysis identified more diagnostic errors in patients with atypical presentations (23.1% vs 3.6%), neurologic chief complaints (46.2% vs 18.8%), admitting intensivists greater than or equal to 45 years old (92.3% vs 65.1%), admitting intensivists with more service weeks/year (mean 12.8 vs 10.9 weeks), and diagnostic uncertainty on admission (77% vs 25.1%). Generalized linear mixed models determined that atypical presentation (odds ratio [OR] 4.58) and diagnostic uncertainty on admission (OR 9.67) were significantly associated with diagnostic error.
AHRQ-funded; HS026965.
Citation: Cifra CL, Custer JW, Smith CM .
Prevalence and characteristics of diagnostic error in pediatric critical care: a multicenter study.
Crit Care Med 2023 Nov; 51(11):1492-501. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005942..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Medical Errors, Patient Safety
Marshall TL, Rinke ML, Olson APJ
Diagnostic error in pediatrics: a narrative review.
This narrative review focuses on the relative paucity of large, high-quality studies of diagnostic errors and what is known at present about the incident and epidemiology as well as the established research for identifying, evaluating, and reducing diagnostic errors. The authors propose several key research questions aimed at addressing persistent gaps in the pediatric diagnostic error literature. The authors state that additional research is needed to better establish the epidemiology of diagnostic errors in pediatrics, including identifying high-risk clinical scenarios, patient populations, and groups of diagnoses.
AHRQ-funded; HS023827; HS026644.
Citation: Marshall TL, Rinke ML, Olson APJ .
Diagnostic error in pediatrics: a narrative review.
Pediatrics 2022 Mar;149(Suppl 3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-045948D..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety, Medical Errors
Cifra CL, Custer JW, Singh H
Diagnostic errors in pediatric critical care: a systematic review.
This study is a systematic review on the prevalence, impact, and contributing factors related to diagnostic errors in the PICU. A database search was done for literature up through December 2019. Using specific criteria, 396 abstracts were screened, and 17 studies were included. Fifteen of 17 studies had an observational research design. Autopsy studies showed a 10-23% rate of missed major diagnosis with 5-16% of the errors having a potential adverse impact on survival and would have changed care management. Retrospective record review studies reported varying rates of diagnostic error from 8% in a general PICU population to 12% among unexpected critical admissions. About a quarter of those patients were discussed at PICU morbidity and mortality conferences. Most misdiagnosed conditions were cardiovascular, infectious, congenital, or neurologic. System, cognitive, and both system and cognitive factors were associated with diagnostic error but there is limited information on the impact of misdiagnosis.
AHRQ-funded; HS026965.
Citation: Cifra CL, Custer JW, Singh H .
Diagnostic errors in pediatric critical care: a systematic review.
Pediatr Crit Care Med 2021 Aug;22(8):701-12. doi: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002735..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Critical Care
Cifra CL, Westlund E, Ten Eyck P
An estimate of missed pediatric sepsis in the emergency department.
AHRQ-funded; HS025753.
Citation: Cifra CL, Westlund E, Ten Eyck P .
An estimate of missed pediatric sepsis in the emergency department.
Diagnosis 2021;8(2):193-98. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0023..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Sepsis, Emergency Department, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Risk
Marshall TL, Ipsaro AJ, Le M
Increasing physician reporting of diagnostic learning opportunities.
This study investigated methods to improve physician reporting of diagnostic errors at the pediatric division of a hospital. In that pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) division only 1 diagnostic-related safety event was reported in the preceding 4 years. The authors aimed to improve attending physician reporting of suspected diagnostic errors from 0 to 2 per 100 PHM patient admissions within 6 months. The improvement team used the Model for Improvement and used the term diagnostic learning opportunity (DLO) with clinicians as opposed to diagnostic error to lessen the stigma. They developed an electronic reporting form and encouraged its use through reminders, scheduled reflection time, and monthly progress reports. Over the course of 13 weeks, there was an increase from 0 to 1.6 per patient admission reports files. Most events (66%) were true diagnostic errors.
AHRQ-funded; HS023827.
Citation: Marshall TL, Ipsaro AJ, Le M .
Increasing physician reporting of diagnostic learning opportunities.
Pediatrics 2021 Jan;147(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2400..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Hospitals, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Dadlez NM, Adelman J, Bundy DG
Contributing factors for pediatric ambulatory diagnostic process errors: Project RedDE.
This study examined root causes of three common pediatric diagnostic errors by having 31 practices enrolled in a national QI collaborative perform monthly “mini-RCAs” (mini root cause analyses). The diagnoses errors studied were missed adolescent depression, missed elevated blood pressure, and missed actionable laboratory values. Twenty-eight practices submitted 184 mini-RCAs with the most common causes being patient volume (adolescent depression and elevated BP), inadequate staffing (adolescent depression), clinic milieu (elevated BP), written communication and provider knowledge (actionable laboratory values), and electronic health records (EHRs) – (elevated BP and actionable laboratory values). The median number of mini-RCAs submitted was 6.
AHRQ-funded; HS024538; HS024713; HS026121.
Citation: Dadlez NM, Adelman J, Bundy DG .
Contributing factors for pediatric ambulatory diagnostic process errors: Project RedDE.
Pediatr Qual Saf 2020 May-Jun;5(3):e299. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000299..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety
Cifra CL, Ten Eyck P, Dawson JD
Factors associated with diagnostic error on admission to a PICU: a pilot study.
This pilot retrospective cohort study examined errors in pediatric ICUs (PICUs) for children during the first 12 hours after PICU admission. A structured tool (Safer Dx) was used to identify diagnostic error in an academic tertiary institution. Out of 50 patients, 4 (8%) had diagnostic errors. The errors were in diagnoses of chronic ear infection, intracranial pressure (two cases), and Bartonella encephalitis. This pilot study will be expanded into a larger and more definitive multicenter study.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087.
Citation: Cifra CL, Ten Eyck P, Dawson JD .
Factors associated with diagnostic error on admission to a PICU: a pilot study.
Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020 May;21(5):e311-e15. doi: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002257..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Hospitals
Bundy DG, Singh H, Stein RE
The design and conduct of Project RedDE: a cluster-randomized trial to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care.
This paper discusses the results of Project RedDE, which was a virtual collaborative quality improvement study to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care practices. Forty-three practices were initially recruited, with a total of 31 practices left at the end due to practice dropout and two participating practices merging. This study was a randomized controlled trial targeting three common diagnostic errors (missed diagnoses of adolescent depression, abnormal blood pressure, and lack of followup for abnormal laboratory results). Contamination across study groups was a recurring problem, but risk mitigations were used. Electronic health records contributed to teams’ success.
AHRQ-funded; HS203608.
Citation: Bundy DG, Singh H, Stein RE .
The design and conduct of Project RedDE: a cluster-randomized trial to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care.
Clin Trials 2019 Apr;16(2):154-64. doi: 10.1177/1740774518820522..
Keywords: Adverse Events, Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Prevention, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Rinke ML, Singh H, Heo M
Diagnostic errors in primary care pediatrics: Project RedDE.
The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency of two high-frequency/subacute diagnostic errors (DEs), and one missed opportunity for diagnosis (MOD) in primary care pediatrics. DE or MOD rates in pediatric primary care were found to be 54 percent for patients with elevated BP, 11 percent for patients with abnormal laboratory values, and 62 percent for adolescents with an opportunity to evaluate for depression.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087; HS023608; HS023602.
Citation: Rinke ML, Singh H, Heo M .
Diagnostic errors in primary care pediatrics: Project RedDE.
Acad Pediatr 2018 Mar;18(2):220-27. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.08.005.
.
.
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Primary Care, Quality Improvement