National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (2)
- Arthritis (1)
- Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (1)
- Critical Care (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (2)
- Healthcare Delivery (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Hospitalization (1)
- Hospitals (4)
- Injuries and Wounds (1)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (1)
- Maternal Care (1)
- Mortality (1)
- Outcomes (2)
- Palliative Care (4)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Patient Safety (3)
- Pneumonia (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Provider Performance (2)
- Public Reporting (2)
- Quality Improvement (2)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (5)
- (-) Quality Measures (16)
- (-) Quality of Care (16)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Risk (1)
- Surgery (3)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 16 of 16 Research Studies DisplayedLeBlanc TW, Ritchie CS, Friedman F
Adherence to measuring what matters items when caring for patients with hematologic malignancies versus solid tumors.
The authors sought to assess adherence to Measuring What Matters (MWM) measures by palliative care clinicians caring for patients with hematologic malignancies, compared to those with solid tumors. They found that MWM adherence regarding symptom assessment and meeting emotional needs was lower for patients with hematologic malignancies compared to those with solid tumors. They concluded that this finding suggests two key areas for quality improvement initiatives in palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681; HS022763.
Citation: LeBlanc TW, Ritchie CS, Friedman F .
Adherence to measuring what matters items when caring for patients with hematologic malignancies versus solid tumors.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Dec;52(6):775-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.09.004.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Quality of Care, Palliative Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Measures
Wysham NG, Hochman MJ, Wolf SP
Performance of consultative palliative care model in achieving quality metrics in the ICU.
The purpose of this paper was to assess adherence to proposed quality metrics of ICU-based palliative care by palliative care specialists. The authors found that palliative care consultations in an ICU setting are characterized by variable adherence to candidate ICU palliative care quality metrics. Although symptom management was the foremost reason for palliative care consultation, consultants infrequently documented symptom assessments. The consultants performed better in offering spiritual support and managing documented symptoms.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681.
Citation: Wysham NG, Hochman MJ, Wolf SP .
Performance of consultative palliative care model in achieving quality metrics in the ICU.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Dec;52(6):873-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.05.026.
.
.
Keywords: Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Palliative Care, Quality of Care, Quality Measures
Bilimoria KY, Barnard C
The new CMS Hospital Quality Star Ratings: the stars are not aligned.
This viewpoint paper discussed the Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings, released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, including issues concerning stakeholders. The authors recommended continuing vigorous work to improve the availability of meaningful measures. They concluded that current hospital rating systems do not provide comprehensive, relevant, accessible information, and current composites may mislead patients, payers, and hospitals; however, opportunities to provide meaningful hospital quality report cards are within reach.
AHRQ-funded; HS021857; HS024516.
Citation: Bilimoria KY, Barnard C .
The new CMS Hospital Quality Star Ratings: the stars are not aligned.
JAMA 2016 Nov 1;316(17):1761-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13679.
.
.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Quality of Care, Hospitals, Quality Improvement, Quality Measures
Suter LG, Barber CE, Herrin J
American College of Rheumatology white paper on performance outcome measures in rheumatology.
The objective of this study was to highlight the opportunities and challenges of developing and implementing performance outcome measures in rheumatology for accountability purposes. The authors' hypothetical outcome measure was a measure of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity intended for evaluating Accountable Care Organization performance. They provided a summary table of key take-home points for clinicians and policymakers. The authors concluded that the most effective and meaningful measures can only be created through the close collaboration of patients, providers, measure developers, and policymakers.
AHRQ-funded; HS024412.
Citation: Suter LG, Barber CE, Herrin J .
American College of Rheumatology white paper on performance outcome measures in rheumatology.
Arthritis Care Res 2016 Oct;68(10):1390-401. doi: 10.1002/acr.22936.
.
.
Keywords: Quality of Care, Quality Measures, Outcomes, Arthritis
Yazdany J, Myslinski R, Miller A
Methods for developing the American College of Rheumatology's electronic clinical quality measures.
The authors discuss the methodologic approach recommended by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) to develop new electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) in priority areas. They recommend that the ACR’s eCQM development program evolve to address newly-identified gaps in care that are amenable to quality improvement and that input from rheumatologists continue to be a key ingredient for a measurement strategy that seeks not just to assess performance but to improve outcomes for patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS024412.
Citation: Yazdany J, Myslinski R, Miller A .
Methods for developing the American College of Rheumatology's electronic clinical quality measures.
Arthritis Care Res 2016 Oct;68(10):1402-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.22985.
.
.
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Quality of Care, Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Measures, Quality Measures
Minami CA, Dahlke AR, Barnard C
Association between hospital characteristics and performance on the new hospital-acquired condition reduction program's surgical site infection measures.
This research letter evaluated the association between hospital characteristics and surgical site infection (SSI) measures. The authors found that hospitals with higher hospital quality summary scores were more frequently poor performers for SSI and had higher standardized infection ratios. Hospitals were more likely to be poor performers for colon SSI and hysterectomy SSI if they were a teaching hospital, safety-net hospital, or level I trauma center. Teaching hospitals were more likely to be poor performers for colorectal SSI, but the association was not as consistent for hysterectomy.
AHRQ-funded; HS021857.
Citation: Minami CA, Dahlke AR, Barnard C .
Association between hospital characteristics and performance on the new hospital-acquired condition reduction program's surgical site infection measures.
JAMA Surg 2016 Aug;151(8):777-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0408.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Surgery, Injuries and Wounds, Adverse Events, Quality Measures, Hospitals, Quality of Care
Maurer M, Firminger K, Dardees P
Understanding consumer perceptions and awareness of hospital-based maternity care quality measures.
This study explored factors that may influence use of comparative public reports for hospital maternity care. It found that, when describing high-quality maternity care, participants focused on interactions with providers, including respect for preferences and communication. The importance of quality measures was influenced by the extent to which they focused on babies' health, were perceived as the hospital's responsibility, and were perceived as representing "standard care."
AHRQ-funded; HS021873.
Citation: Maurer M, Firminger K, Dardees P .
Understanding consumer perceptions and awareness of hospital-based maternity care quality measures.
Health Serv Res 2016 Jun;51 Suppl 2:1188-211. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12472.
.
.
Keywords: Maternal Care, Pregnancy, Patient Experience, Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Public Reporting
Hernandez-Boussard TM, McDonald KM, Morrison DE
Risks of adverse events in colorectal patients: population-based study.
The authors sought to assess adverse events in colorectal surgical patients. They found important differential rates of adverse events by diagnostic category, with the highest odds ratio occurring in patients undergoing surgery for ischemic colitis.
AHRQ-funded; HS018558.
Citation: Hernandez-Boussard TM, McDonald KM, Morrison DE .
Risks of adverse events in colorectal patients: population-based study.
J Surg Res 2016 May 15;202(2):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.013.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Adverse Events, Surgery, Patient Safety, Risk, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality of Care, Quality Measures
Wahl ER, Yazdany J
Challenges and opportunities in using patient-reported outcomes in quality measurement in rheumatology.
This article reviews the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in assessing health care quality, and highlights challenges and opportunities specific to their use in rheumatology quality measurement. It describes the current use of PROs as quality measures in rheumatology, and frames an agenda for future work supporting development of meaningful quality measures based on PROs.
AHRQ-funded; HS024412.
Citation: Wahl ER, Yazdany J .
Challenges and opportunities in using patient-reported outcomes in quality measurement in rheumatology.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2016 May;42(2):363-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2016.01.008.
.
.
Keywords: Quality of Care, Outcomes, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures
McConnell KJ, Lindrooth RC, Wholey DR
Modern management practices and hospital admissions.
The researchers investigated whether the modern management practices and publicly reported performance measures are associated with choice of hospital for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). They found that, overall, a one standard deviation change in management practice scores is associated with an 8% increase in AMI admissions.
AHRQ-funded; HS018466.
Citation: McConnell KJ, Lindrooth RC, Wholey DR .
Modern management practices and hospital admissions.
Health Econ 2016 Apr;25(4):470-85. doi: 10.1002/hec.3171.
.
.
Keywords: Hospitals, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Public Reporting, Provider Performance
Kamal AH, Bull J, Ritchie CS
Adherence to measuring what matters measures using point-of-care data collection across diverse clinical settings.
The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the implementation of Measuring What Matters (MWM) measures by exploring documentation of quality measure adherence across six diverse clinical settings inherent to palliative care practice. The authors found that the lowest adherence involved comprehensive assessments during the first visit in hospitalized patients in the intensive care unit and that the highest adherence across all settings involved documentation of management of moderate to severe pain. They recommended additional studies for better understanding of benchmarks and acceptable ranges for adherence tailored to various clinical settings.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681; HS022763.
Citation: Kamal AH, Bull J, Ritchie CS .
Adherence to measuring what matters measures using point-of-care data collection across diverse clinical settings.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Mar;51(3):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.313.
.
.
Keywords: Quality Measures, Palliative Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality of Care, Patient Safety
Dy SM, Herr K, Bernacki RE
Methodological research priorities in palliative care and hospice quality measurement.
The authors describe three key priorities: 1) defining the population of interest for palliative care quality indicators, 2) developing methods to measure quality from different data sources, and 3) conducting research to advance the development of patient/family-reported indicators. They apply these concepts to the key quality domain of advance care planning and address relevance to implementation of indicators in improving care in order to facilitate improved quality measurement across all populations with serious illness and care for patients and families.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681.
Citation: Dy SM, Herr K, Bernacki RE .
Methodological research priorities in palliative care and hospice quality measurement.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Feb;51(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.019.
.
.
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Palliative Care, Quality Measures, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality of Care
Minami CA, Sheils CR, Bilimoria KY
Process improvement in surgery.
The authors reviewed aspects of process improvement-quality improvement that are relevant to the currently practicing surgeon. They discussed commonly used quality improvement data platforms, process improvement methodologies, examples of successful local quality improvement initiatives, the role of regional surgical improvement collaboratives, common barriers to quality improvement efforts, and potential solutions to overcome them.
AHRQ-funded; HS000078.
Citation: Minami CA, Sheils CR, Bilimoria KY .
Process improvement in surgery.
Curr Probl Surg 2016 Feb;53(2):62-96. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2015.11.001.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Quality Measures, Surgery
Walkey AJ, Weinberg J, Wiener RS
Association of do-not-resuscitate orders and hospital mortality rate among patients with pneumonia.
The researchers evaluated the effect of analytic approaches accounting for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status on risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates and performance rankings. They found that after accounting for patient DNR status and between-hospital variation in the association between DNR status and mortality, hospitals with higher DNR rates had lower mortality.
AHRQ-funded; HS020672.
Citation: Walkey AJ, Weinberg J, Wiener RS .
Association of do-not-resuscitate orders and hospital mortality rate among patients with pneumonia.
JAMA Intern Med 2016 Jan;176(1):97-104. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6324.
.
.
Keywords: Hospitals, Mortality, Quality of Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Pneumonia, Provider Performance, Respiratory Conditions
Moy E, Coffey RM, Moore BJ
AHRQ Author: Moy E
Length of stay in EDs: variation across classifications of clinical condition and patient discharge disposition.
The researchers used a census of one state's data to measure length of emergency departments stays by patients' conditions and dispositions and exlore differences between means and medians as quality metrics. For the 10 most common diagnoses, patients with relatively minor injuries typically required the shortest mean stay (3 hours or less); conditions resulting in admission or transfer tended to be more serious, resulting in longer stays.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Moy E, Coffey RM, Moore BJ .
Length of stay in EDs: variation across classifications of clinical condition and patient discharge disposition.
Am J Emerg Med 2016 Jan;34(1):83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.09.031..
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Emergency Department, Quality Measures, Hospitalization, Quality of Care
Yanes AF, McElroy LM, Abecassis ZA
Observation for assessment of clinician performance: a narrative review.
The authors summarized studies utilizing video recorded or in-person observations for assessing clinician performance in medicine and surgery. They found that observations are useful for the improvement of healthcare delivery through the identification of clinician lapses and weaknesses that affect quality and safety. Further, limitations of observations included the Hawthorne effect and the necessity of trained observers to capture and analyze the notes or videos.
AHRQ-funded; HS000078.
Citation: Yanes AF, McElroy LM, Abecassis ZA .
Observation for assessment of clinician performance: a narrative review.
BMJ Qual Saf 2016 Jan;25(1):46-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004171.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Quality Measures