National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Asthma (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Diabetes (1)
- Disparities (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (8)
- Guidelines (4)
- Obesity (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2)
- (-) Prevention (10)
- Primary Care (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- (-) Research Methodologies (10)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Social Determinants of Health (2)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (6)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 10 of 10 Research Studies DisplayedHerman WH, Bullock A, Boltri JM
AHRQ Author: Tracer H
The National Clinical Care Commission report to Congress: background, methods, and foundational recommendations.
This AHRQ-authored paper describes the background, methods, and recommendations of the National Clinical Care Commission (NCCC) focused on factors likely to improve the delivery of high-quality care to all people with diabetes. It is the first in a series of five articles describing the recommendations. The Commission made recommendations at all levels: patient, practice, health system, and health policy. This is the first paper in a series of five articles about the NCCC recommendations. The five articles include recommendations to 1) reduce diabetes-related risks, prevent type 2 diabetes, and avert diabetes complications through changes in federal policies and programs affecting the general population; 2) prevent type 2 diabetes in at-risk individuals through targeted lifestyle and medication interventions; and 3) improve the treatment of diabetes and its complications to improve the health outcomes of people with diabetes. This first article reviews the successes and limitations of previous federal efforts to combat diabetes, describes the establishment of and charge to the NCCC, and discusses the development of a hybrid conceptual model that guided the NCCC’s novel all-of-government approach to address diabetes as a societal and medical problem. The authors then review the procedures used by the NCCC to gather information from federal agencies, stakeholders, key informants, and the public and to conduct literature reviews. Finally, they review the NCCC's three foundational recommendations: 1) improve the coordination of non-health-related and health-related federal agencies to address the social and environmental conditions that are accelerating the diabetes epidemic; 2) ensure that all Americans at risk for and with diabetes have health insurance and access to health care; and 3) ensure that all federal policies and programs promote health equity in diabetes.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Herman WH, Bullock A, Boltri JM .
The National Clinical Care Commission report to Congress: background, methods, and foundational recommendations.
Diabetes Care 2023 Feb; 46(2):e14-e23. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0611..
Keywords: Diabetes, Chronic Conditions, Prevention, Research Methodologies
Lin JS, Hoffman L, Bean SI
Addressing racism in preventive services: methods report to support the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this report was to articulate the definitional and conceptual issues around racism and health inequity and to describe how racism and health inequities are currently addressed in preventive health. An audit was conducted assessing published literature on policy and position statements addressing racism, a subset of cancer and cardiovascular topics in USPSTF reports, recent systematic reviews on interventions to reduce health inequities, and societies, organizations, agencies, and funding bodies to gather information about how they address racism and health equity. Findings showed that racism is complex and pervasive, operates at multiple interrelated levels, and exerts negative effects on other social determinants and health and well-being through multiple pathways. The most directly relevant and immediately useful guidance identified is that from the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) working group.
AHRQ-funded; 290201600006C.
Citation: Lin JS, Hoffman L, Bean SI .
Addressing racism in preventive services: methods report to support the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2021 Dec 21;326(23):2412-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17579..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Social Determinants of Health, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Disparities, Research Methodologies, Prevention, Evidence-Based Practice
Caughey AB, Krist AH, Wolff TA
AHRQ Author: Wolff TA
USPSTF approach to addressing sex and gender when making recommendations for clinical preventive services.
The USPSTF reviewed its past recommendations that included the use of sex and gender terms, reviewed the approaches of other guideline-making bodies, and pilot-tested strategies to address sex and gender diversity. Based on the findings, the USPSTF intends to use an inclusive approach to identify issues related to sex and gender at the start of the guideline development process; assess the applicability, variability, and quality of evidence as a function of sex and gender; ensure clarity in the use of language regarding sex and gender; and identify evidence gaps related to sex and gender. The USPSTF recognizes limited evidence to inform the preventive care of populations based on gender identity.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Caughey AB, Krist AH, Wolff TA .
USPSTF approach to addressing sex and gender when making recommendations for clinical preventive services.
JAMA 2021 Nov 16;326(19):1953-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.15731..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention, Research Methodologies
Krist AH, Barry MJ, Wolff TA
AHRQ Author: Wolff TA, Fan TM
Evolution of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's methods.
In this commentary on an article appearing in the same issue, the authors stated that the methods used by the USPSTF deliberately set a high bar for making evidence-based recommendations. They indicated that consumers of preventive service guidelines need to know concretely what is known and unknown and further need confidence that what is being recommended is not influenced by economic or political pressures or by professional opinion with a limited evidence basis.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Krist AH, Barry MJ, Wolff TA .
Evolution of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's methods.
Am J Prev Med 2020 Mar;58(3):332-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.11.003..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention, Research Methodologies
Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q
AHRQ Author: Ngo-Metzger Q, Mills J
Social determinants as a preventive service: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force methods considerations for research.
The authors offer a brief review of the social determinants of health that may be germane to the USPSTF, the methods the USPSTF uses to evaluate relevant evidence, and current evidence gaps for social risks. Their road map for research is intended to spark ingenuity and purpose in the next generation of research studies, thereby ensuring that future recommendations to address and prevent social risks in primary care are informed by high-quality evidence.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS026664.
Citation: Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q .
Social determinants as a preventive service: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force methods considerations for research.
Am J Prev Med 2019 Dec;57(6s1):S6-s12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.013..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Social Determinants of Health, Research Methodologies, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention
Wheatley LM, Wood R, Nadeau K
Mind the gaps: clinical trial concepts to address unanswered questions in aeroallergen immunotherapy-an NIAID/AHRQ workshop.
A joint AHRQ and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAAD) workshop was held to develop trial concepts that could improve the use and effectiveness of aeroallergen immunotherapy (AAIT). Four different expert groups were formed to propose different study designs. These study designs would create clinical trials of long duration and would need highly characterized patient populations.
AHRQ-funded; 290200710061I.
Citation: Wheatley LM, Wood R, Nadeau K .
Mind the gaps: clinical trial concepts to address unanswered questions in aeroallergen immunotherapy-an NIAID/AHRQ workshop.
J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019 May;143(5):1711-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.01.032..
Keywords: Asthma, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention, Research Methodologies, Respiratory Conditions
Bennett WL, Wilson RF, Zhang A
Methods for evaluating natural experiments in obesity: a systematic review.
The researchers identified studies that report effects of programs, policies, or built environment changes on obesity prevention and control and described their methods. They found many methodologically diverse natural experiments and experimental studies that reported effects of U.S. and non-U.S. programs, policies, or built environment changes on obesity prevention and control, reinforcing the need for methodological and analytic advances to strengthen evaluations of obesity prevention and control initiatives.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200007I.
Citation: Bennett WL, Wilson RF, Zhang A .
Methods for evaluating natural experiments in obesity: a systematic review.
Ann Intern Med 2018 Jun 5;168(11):791-800. doi: 10.7326/m18-0309.
.
.
Keywords: Obesity, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention, Research Methodologies
Villani J, Ngo-Metzger Q, Vincent IS
AHRQ Author: Ngo-Metzger Q
Sources of funding for research in evidence reviews that inform recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.
This study characterizes the sources of funding for the scientific evidence base used by the USPSTF. One or more funding sources were identified for 79 percent of the 1,650 research articles. Government agencies provided support for 931 articles (56 percent). The remaining support came from nonprofits or universities (530 articles, 32 percent) and industry (282 articles, 17 percent).The sources of funding varied by recommendation topic.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Villani J, Ngo-Metzger Q, Vincent IS .
Sources of funding for research in evidence reviews that inform recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2018 May 22;319(20):2132-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5404.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Research Methodologies, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Bibbins-Domingo K, Whitlock E, Wolff T
AHRQ Author: Wolff T, Ngo-Metzger Q
Developing recommendations for evidence-based clinical preventive services for diverse populations: methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) summarizes the principles and considerations that guide development of its recommendations for diverse U.S. populations. It uses these principles through each step in the evidence-based guideline process: developing the research plan, conducting the evidence review, developing the recommendation, and communicating to guideline users. A comprehensive list of recommendations that includes considerations for specific populations is provided.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Bibbins-Domingo K, Whitlock E, Wolff T .
Developing recommendations for evidence-based clinical preventive services for diverse populations: methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Ann Intern Med 2017 Apr 18;166(8):565-71. doi: 10.7326/m16-2656.
.
.
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention, Research Methodologies, Guidelines
Cohen DJ, Balasubramanian BA, Gordon L
A national evaluation of a dissemination and implementation initiative to enhance primary care practice capacity and improve cardiovascular disease care: the ESCALATES study protocol.
This paper describes the study protocol for the EvidenceNOW national evaluation, which is called Evaluating System Change to Advance Learning and Take Evidence to Scale (ESCALATES). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods analyses will be conducted to examine how Cooperatives organize to provide external support to practices, to compare effectiveness of the dissemination and implementation approaches they implement, and to examine how regional variations and other organization and contextual factors influence implementation and effectiveness.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981; HS023940.
Citation: Cohen DJ, Balasubramanian BA, Gordon L .
A national evaluation of a dissemination and implementation initiative to enhance primary care practice capacity and improve cardiovascular disease care: the ESCALATES study protocol.
Implement Sci 2016 Jun 29;11(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0449-8.
.
.
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention, Primary Care, Research Methodologies