National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 1 of 1 Research Studies DisplayedAlmario CV, Chey WD, Iriana S
Computer versus physician identification of gastrointestinal alarm features.
This study's objective was to compare the number of alarms documented by physicians during usual care vs. that collected by a computer algorithm called Automated Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (AEGIS). AEGIS identified more patients with positive alarm features compared to physicians and also documented more positive alarms. Moreover, clinicians documented only 30% of the positive alarms self-reported by patients through AEGIS.
AHRQ-funded; HS000046.
Citation: Almario CV, Chey WD, Iriana S .
Computer versus physician identification of gastrointestinal alarm features.
Int J Med Inform 2015 Dec;84(12):1111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.07.006.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Digestive Disease and Health, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Patient Safety