National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Blood Pressure (1)
- Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (9)
- Eye Disease and Health (1)
- (-) Guidelines (9)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Home Healthcare (1)
- Infectious Diseases (2)
- Medication (1)
- Newborns/Infants (1)
- Prevention (6)
- Primary Care (3)
- Public Health (1)
- Screening (4)
- Sexual Health (1)
- Social Determinants of Health (1)
- (-) U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (9)
- Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 9 of 9 Research Studies DisplayedHenderson JT, Senger CA, Henninger M
Behavioral counseling interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
This updated evidence report and systematic review accompanied the USPSTF final recommendation for behavioral counseling interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in adults and adolescents, which was published in August 2020. Studies from the previous 2014 review and literature from January 2013 through May 2019 was reviewed to find good- and fair-quality randomized and nonrandomized controlled intervention studies conducted in primary care settings. The review included 37 randomized trials and 2 nonrandomized controlled intervention studies. The study populations were mostly heterosexual adolescents and young adults, females, and racial and ethnic minorities at increased risk for STIs. Thirty-four trials reported behavioral change outcomes after interventions. The largest reductions in STI incidence were reported after group or individual counseling sessions lasting more than 2 hours. Evidence was limited on interventions of shorter duration persisting beyond 1 year.
AHRQ-funded; 2902015000017I.
Citation: Henderson JT, Senger CA, Henninger M .
Behavioral counseling interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2020 Aug 18;324(7):682-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10371..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Infectious Diseases, Sexual Health, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines
Henderson JT, Webber EM, Bean SI
Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Investigators systematically reviewed the benefits and harms of asymptomatic bacteriuria screening and treatment in adults, including during pregnancy, to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. They found that screening and treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy was associated with reduced rates of pyelonephritis and low birth weights, while benefits of asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment in nonpregnant adult populations were not found. Trial evidence was limited.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500007.
Citation: Henderson JT, Webber EM, Bean SI .
Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2019 Sep 24;322(12):1195-205. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10060..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Infectious Diseases, Prevention, Screening, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Nelson HD, Fu R, Zakher B
Medication use for the risk reduction of primary breast cancer in women: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this paper was to update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force systematic review on medications to reduce risk of primary (first diagnosis) invasive breast cancer in women. Investigators abstracted data on methods, participant characteristics, eligibility criteria, outcome ascertainment, and follow-up; individual trial results were combined using a profile likelihood random-effects model. Results showed that tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors were associated with lower risk of primary invasive breast cancer in women but also were associated with adverse effects that differed between medications. Risk stratification methods to identify patients with increased breast cancer risk demonstrated low accuracy.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500009I.
Citation: Nelson HD, Fu R, Zakher B .
Medication use for the risk reduction of primary breast cancer in women: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2019 Sep 3;322(9):868-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5780..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Medication, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Primary Care
Henrikson NB, Bowles EJ, Blasi PR
Screening for pancreatic cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The authors systematically reviewed the benefits and harms of screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in order to inform the USPSTF. They found that imaging-based screening in groups at high familial risk can detect pancreatic adenocarcinoma with limited evidence of minimal harms. However, the effect of screening on morbidity and mortality in groups at high familial risk has not been studied, and no data are available in average-risk populations. They conclude that there is limited evidence to assess benefits or harms of surgical intervention for screen-detected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
AHRQ-funded; 2902015000071.
Citation: Henrikson NB, Bowles EJ, Blasi PR .
Screening for pancreatic cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2019 Aug 6;322(5):445-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.6190..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cancer, Screening, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention
Livingston CJ, Allison RD, Niebuhr DW
AHRQ Author: Niebuhr DW
Preventive medicine physicians and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 6|18 Initiative.
This paper describes the American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) work done as part of the cooperative 5-year agreement called the 6|18 Initiative to improve population health through primary care and public health integration. This initiative is called 6|18 because its’ aim was to target six common and high-cost health behaviors/conditions with 18 proven interventions. CDC created three different buckets to describe the preventions. The six health behaviors/conditions targeted included reducing tobacco use, control high blood pressure, improve antibiotic use, control asthma, prevent unintended pregnancy, and prevent type 2 diabetes. The initiative aligned recommendations from national and professional societies and focused the guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). After six telephone-moderated discussions of the authors, three themes were developed as to how physicians may perceive the 6|18 interventions. The problems included lack of knowledge/awareness, variations in financial incentives and operational challenges such as time constraints.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Livingston CJ, Allison RD, Niebuhr DW .
Preventive medicine physicians and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 6|18 Initiative.
Am J Prev Med 2019 Jul;57(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.014..
Keywords: Prevention, Primary Care, Public Health, Evidence-Based Practice, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Guidelines, Chronic Conditions
Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q
AHRQ Author: Ngo-Metzger Q
What evidence do we need before recommending routine screening for social determinants of health?
This editorial, co-written by two members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and a member of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) discusses the need to determine if social determinants of health (SDOH) should be discussed during a primary care visit. At the present time only 2 USPSTF recommendations are social determinants (intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults; and child maltreatment). However, there are recommendations for nine health behaviors and three mental health behaviors that are included in SDOH. There is an absence of evidence of benefit for routine screening for many of the social determinants, and the USPSTF is currently conducting an evaluation to understand the state of screening for SDOH.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q .
What evidence do we need before recommending routine screening for social determinants of health?
Am Fam Physician 2019 May 15;99(10):602-05..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Primary Care, Screening, Social Determinants of Health, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Tracer H, Welch R
AHRQ Author: Tracer H
Screening for atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography.
This case study describes a 67-year-old woman with hypertension who neither drinks nor smokes and is moderately physically active. Her brother has recently been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and she requests an electrocardiograph (ECG) to be screened herself for this condition. The case study questions are based on USPSTF recommendations for screening for atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Tracer H, Welch R .
Screening for atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography.
Am Fam Physician 2019 Mar 15;99(6):383-84..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Screening, Prevention, Evidence-Based Practice, Case Study, Guidelines
Guirguis-Blake JM, Evans CV, Rushkin M
Ocular prophylaxis for gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
This evidence report and systematic review was commissioned for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to update the evidence of using prophylactic ocular topic medication for all newborns to prevent gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum (GON) which can cause blindness if not treated immediately. Many articles were screened for inclusion, and of those included the recommendations remained an “A” grade recommendation, which is to apply the topical medication on all newborns due to an increase in syphilis prevalence.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500007I.
Citation: Guirguis-Blake JM, Evans CV, Rushkin M .
Ocular prophylaxis for gonococcal ophthalmia neonatorum: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2019 Jan 29;321(4):404-06. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17847..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Eye Disease and Health, Guidelines, Newborns/Infants, Prevention, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Patil SJ, Koopman RJ, Belden J
The role of home BP monitoring: answers to 10 common questions.
This review examines what role home blood-pressure monitoring (HBPM) should take in the management of patients with hypertension. The answers to ten evidence-based questions, with reference to USPSTF recommendations, are used to provide insight. These questions include: Can HPBM be used to confirm a hypertension diagnosis? What are the diagnostic and treatment targets for HBPM? Does HBPM improve control of hypertension? Does HBPM help improve medication adherence? Does HBPM improve BP outcomes?
AHRQ-funded; HS023328.
Citation: Patil SJ, Koopman RJ, Belden J .
The role of home BP monitoring: answers to 10 common questions.
J Fam Pract 2019 Jan/Feb;68(1):29-33..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Blood Pressure, Home Healthcare, Evidence-Based Practice, Care Management, Guidelines