National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedSohn W, Resnick MJ, Greenfield S
Impact of adherence to quality measures for localized prostate cancer on patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related complications.
Given the small number of narrowly focused measures in prostate cancer care, the researchers sought to determine whether adherence to any of the available payer-driven quality measures influences patient-centered outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), patient satisfaction, and treatment-related complications. They concluded that compliance with available nationally endorsed quality indicators was not associated with clinically important changes in patient-centered outcomes (HRQOL, satisfaction, or complications) within 1-year.
AHRQ-funded; HS019356; HS022640.
Citation: Sohn W, Resnick MJ, Greenfield S .
Impact of adherence to quality measures for localized prostate cancer on patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related complications.
Med Care 2016 Aug;54(8):738-44. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000562.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Quality of Life, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient Experience
Memtsoudis SG, Yoo D, Stundner O
Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement.
This study compares both single-shot femoral nerve block (FNB) and adductor canal block (ACB), side to side, in the same patients undergoing bilateral TKA. It found that the use of ACBs vs FNBs in knee arthroplasty patients yielded similar results in absolute pain scores, motor strength and patient satisfaction.
AHRQ-funded; HS021734.
Citation: Memtsoudis SG, Yoo D, Stundner O .
Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement.
Int Orthop 2015 Apr;39(4):673-80. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2527-3..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Treatments, Outcomes, Patient Experience, Pain