National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedVemana G, Kim EH, Bhayani SB
Survival comparison between endoscopic and surgical management for patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a matched propensity score analysis using surveillance, epidemiology and end results-Medicare data.
The researchers sought to determine survival differences among patients receiving endoscopic vs surgical management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). They found that although initial survival outcomes are similar for endoscopic and surgical management of nonmuscle-invasive, low-grade UTUC, both cancer-specific survival and overall survival are significantly inferior for the endoscopic management group in the longer term. They also found that transition from initial endoscopic management to surgical intervention appears to have limited impact on survival.
AHRQ-funded; HS019455.
Citation: Vemana G, Kim EH, Bhayani SB .
Survival comparison between endoscopic and surgical management for patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a matched propensity score analysis using surveillance, epidemiology and end results-Medicare data.
Urology 2016 Sep;95:115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.05.033.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Comparative Effectiveness, Elderly, Mortality, Surgery
Zeitler EP, Hellkamp AS, Schulte PJ
Comparative effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention in women.
The researchers examined clinical practice data to compare survival rates among women with heart failure with or without a primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Theyn found that among patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, a primary prevention ICD was associated with a significant survival advantage among women and among men.
AHRQ-funded; HS021092.
Citation: Zeitler EP, Hellkamp AS, Schulte PJ .
Comparative effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention in women.
Circ Heart Fail 2016 Jan;9(1):e002630. doi: 10.1161/circheartfailure.115.002630.
.
.
Keywords: Medical Devices, Comparative Effectiveness, Prevention, Heart Disease and Health, Mortality