National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (52)
- Adverse Events (142)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (4)
- Back Health and Pain (1)
- Behavioral Health (2)
- Blood Pressure (1)
- Blood Thinners (3)
- Burnout (2)
- Cancer (3)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (3)
- Care Coordination (2)
- Caregiving (2)
- Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) (1)
- Children/Adolescents (26)
- Chronic Conditions (3)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (8)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (10)
- Communication (19)
- Comparative Effectiveness (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Critical Care (6)
- Data (4)
- Dental and Oral Health (3)
- Depression (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (53)
- Disparities (1)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (2)
- Elderly (2)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (23)
- Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing) (6)
- Emergency Department (15)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (4)
- Falls (1)
- Family Health and History (2)
- Guidelines (2)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (3)
- Healthcare Costs (2)
- Healthcare Delivery (8)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (55)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Hospital Discharge (4)
- Hospitalization (5)
- Hospitals (13)
- Imaging (5)
- Implementation (3)
- Inpatient Care (9)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (6)
- Kidney Disease and Health (1)
- Labor and Delivery (2)
- Long-Term Care (3)
- Maternal Care (1)
- Medical Devices (1)
- (-) Medical Errors (205)
- Medical Liability (15)
- Medicare (2)
- Medication (54)
- Medication: Safety (33)
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (1)
- Newborns/Infants (4)
- Nursing Homes (3)
- Opioids (1)
- Orthopedics (1)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (2)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (4)
- Patient Experience (2)
- Patient Safety (169)
- Payment (1)
- Policy (2)
- Practice Patterns (4)
- Pregnancy (2)
- Prevention (7)
- Primary Care (9)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Provider (6)
- Provider: Health Personnel (2)
- Provider: Pharmacist (6)
- Provider: Physician (5)
- Provider Performance (1)
- Public Reporting (3)
- Quality Improvement (17)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (3)
- Quality of Care (34)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Risk (10)
- Rural Health (1)
- Sepsis (2)
- Shared Decision Making (6)
- Sleep Problems (1)
- Stress (1)
- Stroke (1)
- Surgery (9)
- Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (1)
- System Design (1)
- Teams (2)
- Telehealth (3)
- Tools & Toolkits (3)
- Training (1)
- Transitions of Care (3)
- Transplantation (3)
- Treatments (1)
- Web-Based (1)
- Women (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
51 to 75 of 205 Research Studies DisplayedClassen DC, Munier W, Verzier N
AHRQ Author: Munier W, Eldridge N, Brady PJ, Helwig A, Battles J
Measuring patient safety: the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System (past, present, and future).
This review article discusses the development, strengths and limitations, and future of the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System (MPSMS), which was created more than 10 years ago. MPSMS is a chart review-based national patient safety surveillance system that provides rates of 21 specific hospital inpatient adverse event measures, which are divided into 4 clinical domains (general, hospital-acquired infections, post-procedure adverse events, and adverse drug events). The 2014 MPSMS national sample was drawn from 1109 hospitals and includes approximately 20,000 medical records of patients admitted to the hospital for at least 1 of 4 conditions: congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and major surgical procedures as defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Surgical Care Improvement Project. The MSPMS is now undergoing a major transformation to capture additional types of adverse events, and is being renamed the Quality and Safety Review System (QSRS). Data will be electronically imported and will be updated and evolved over time to incorporate expanded standardized data available from electronic health records.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Classen DC, Munier W, Verzier N .
Measuring patient safety: the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System (past, present, and future).
J Patient Saf 2021 Apr 1;17(3):e234-3240. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000322..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Medicare, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Antunez AG, Saari A, Miller J
Patient preferences in cases of inter-system medical error discovery (IMED).
This study looked at patients’ preferences in reporting by physicians when there are medical errors, both self-discovered by the physician, and for inter-system medical error discoveries (IMEDs). Telephone interviews were conducted with 30 patient volunteers from Michigan from January to March 2018. Two medical vignettes were presented, one involving a single physician discovering their own error and the other involving an IMED scenario. Analysis showed that patients considered IMED essentially equivalent to self-discovered errors, and strongly preferred disclosure for both scenarios. Patients said they would likely take certain actions following disclosure of another physician’s error, ranging from confronting the physician to changing providers to taking legal action.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Antunez AG, Saari A, Miller J .
Patient preferences in cases of inter-system medical error discovery (IMED).
Ann Surg 2021 Mar;273(3):516-22. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003507..
Keywords: Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Medical Liability, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication
Poghosyan L, Norful AA, Ghaffari A L, Norful AA, Ghaffari A
Psychometric testing of errors of care omission survey: a new tool on patient safety in primary care.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a newly developed survey tool, the Errors of Care Omission Survey (ECOS), measuring omissions in primary care. Four factors emerged representing domains of omissions in primary care. Findings showed that the ECOS can be used in primary care to identify critical omissions, so actions can be taken by clinicians and administrators to prevent them before they result in patient harm. Recommendations included further testing with diverse samples.
AHRQ-funded; HS024758.
Citation: Poghosyan L, Norful AA, Ghaffari A L, Norful AA, Ghaffari A .
Psychometric testing of errors of care omission survey: a new tool on patient safety in primary care.
J Patient Saf 2021 Mar 1;17(2):e107-e14. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000575..
Keywords: Primary Care, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety
Kane-Gill SL, Wong A, Culley CM
JA, et al. Transforming the medication regimen review process using telemedicine to prevent adverse events.
The objective of this study was to determine the impact of pharmacist-led telemedicine services on reducing high-risk medication adverse drug events (ADEs) for nursing home (NH) residents using medication reconciliation and prospective medication regimen reviews (MRRs) on admission plus ongoing clinical decision support alerts throughout the residents' stay. Studying residents in four NHs in Southwestern Pennsylvania, findings showed that the intervention group had a 92% lower incidence of alert-specific ADEs than usual care, and all-cause hospitalization was similar between groups, as were 30-day readmissions.
AHRQ-funded; HS02420.
Citation: Kane-Gill SL, Wong A, Culley CM .
JA, et al. Transforming the medication regimen review process using telemedicine to prevent adverse events.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2021 Feb;69(2):530-38. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16946..
Keywords: Medication: Safety, Medication, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Telehealth, Health Information Technology (HIT), Provider: Pharmacist, Provider, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Prevention
Abraham J, Galanter WL, Touchette D
Risk factors associated with medication ordering errors.
This study’s goal was to collect data on “voided” orders in computerized order entry systems for medication to 1) identify the nature and characteristics of medication ordering errors; 2) investigate the risk factors associated with these errors and; 3) explore potential strategies to mitigate these risk factors. Data was collected using clinician interviews and surveys within 24 hours of the voided order and using chart reviews. During the 16-month study period 1074 medication orders were voided, with 842 being true medication errors. A total of 22% reached the patient, with at least a single administration, but without causing patient harm. Interviews were conducted on 355 voided orders (33%). Errors were associated with multiple factors not just a single risk factor. The causal contributors included a combination of technological-, cognitive-, environment-, social-, and organization-level factors.
AHRQ-funded; HS025443.
Citation: Abraham J, Galanter WL, Touchette D .
Risk factors associated with medication ordering errors.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021 Jan 15;28(1):86-94. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa264..
Keywords: Medication: Safety, Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing), Medication: Safety, Medication, Medical Errors, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Risk, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Safety
Marshall TL, Ipsaro AJ, Le M
Increasing physician reporting of diagnostic learning opportunities.
This study investigated methods to improve physician reporting of diagnostic errors at the pediatric division of a hospital. In that pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) division only 1 diagnostic-related safety event was reported in the preceding 4 years. The authors aimed to improve attending physician reporting of suspected diagnostic errors from 0 to 2 per 100 PHM patient admissions within 6 months. The improvement team used the Model for Improvement and used the term diagnostic learning opportunity (DLO) with clinicians as opposed to diagnostic error to lessen the stigma. They developed an electronic reporting form and encouraged its use through reminders, scheduled reflection time, and monthly progress reports. Over the course of 13 weeks, there was an increase from 0 to 1.6 per patient admission reports files. Most events (66%) were true diagnostic errors.
AHRQ-funded; HS023827.
Citation: Marshall TL, Ipsaro AJ, Le M .
Increasing physician reporting of diagnostic learning opportunities.
Pediatrics 2021 Jan;147(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2400..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Hospitals, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Griffey RT, Schneider RM, Todorov AA
The emergency department trigger tool: validation and testing to optimize yield.
Researchers validated the emergency department trigger tool (EDTT) in an independent sample and compared record selection approaches to optimize yield for quality improvement. In this single-site study of the EDTT, they observed high levels of validity in trigger selection, yield, and representativeness of adverse events, with yields that are superior to estimates for traditional approaches to adverse event detection. Record selection using weighted triggers outperformed a trigger count threshold approach and far outperformed random sampling from records with at least one trigger. They concluded that the EDTT is a promising efficient and high-yield approach for detecting all-cause harm to guide quality improvement efforts in the emergency department.
AHRQ-funded; HS025052.
Citation: Griffey RT, Schneider RM, Todorov AA .
The emergency department trigger tool: validation and testing to optimize yield.
Acad Emerg Med 2020 Dec;27(12):1279-90. doi: 10.1111/acem.14101..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Salmasian H, Blanchfield BB, Joyce K
Association of display of patient photographs in the electronic health record with wrong-patient order entry errors.
Wrong-patient order entry (WPOE) errors have a high potential for harm; these errors are particularly frequent wherever workflows are complex and multitasking and interruptions are common, such as in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use of noninterruptive display of patient photographs in the banner of the electronic health record (EHR) is associated with a decreased rate of WPOE errors.
AHRQ-funded; HS024713.
Citation: Salmasian H, Blanchfield BB, Joyce K .
Association of display of patient photographs in the electronic health record with wrong-patient order entry errors.
AMA Netw Open 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2019652. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19652..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medication, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Mangrum R, Stewart MD, Gifford DR
Omissions of care in nursing homes: a uniform definition for research and quality improvement.
The goal of this study was to create a uniform definition of omission of care in US nursing homes. Lack of a uniform definition has made efforts to prevent them challenging. Subject matter experts and a broad range of nursing home stakeholders were brought together in iterative rounds of engagement to identify key concepts and aspects of omissions of care and develop a consensus-based definition. The concise definition decided on was: “Omissions of care in nursing homes encompass situations when care–either clinical or nonclinical–is not provided for a resident and results in additional monitoring or intervention or increases the risk of an undesirable or adverse physical, emotional, or psychosocial outcome for the resident."
AHRQ-funded; 233201500014I.
Citation: Mangrum R, Stewart MD, Gifford DR .
Omissions of care in nursing homes: a uniform definition for research and quality improvement.
J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020 Nov;21(11):1587-91.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.08.016..
Keywords: Elderly, Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Risk, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Yansane A, Lee JH, Hebballi N
Assessing the patient safety culture in dentistry.
Medical errors are among the leading causes of death within the United States. Studies have shown that patients can be harmed while receiving care, sometimes resulting in permanent injury or, in extreme cases, death. To reduce the risk of patient safety incidents, it is imperative that a robust culture of safety be established. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the patient safety culture among providers at 4 US dental institutions, comparing the results with their medical counterparts in 2016.
AHRQ-funded; HS024406.
Citation: Yansane A, Lee JH, Hebballi N .
Assessing the patient safety culture in dentistry.
JDR Clin Trans Res 2020 Oct;5(4):399-408. doi: 10.1177/2380084419897614..
Keywords: Surveys on Patient Safety Culture, Patient Safety, Dental and Oral Health, Provider, Medical Errors, Adverse Events
Kang H, Gong Y
Creating a database for health IT events via a hybrid deep learning model.
The authors of this study propose a hybrid learning model to identify health information technology (HIT) events to prevent risks from poorly designed and improperly implemented HIT. Events from the FDA MAUDE database was employed from 6994 samples (3521 HIT and 3473 non-HIT events). Nine individual and 120 hybrid models were employed. Error causes included lack of root cause (72.3%), short descriptions (19.7%) and model undertrained (8.0%). The optimal model was applied to the entire MAUDE database (1991-2018) and generated a HIT event database with 48,997 reports with an annual growth rate of 10%.
AHRQ-funded; HS022895.
Citation: Kang H, Gong Y .
Creating a database for health IT events via a hybrid deep learning model.
J Biomed Inform 2020 Oct;110:103556. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103556..
Keywords: Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Adverse Events
Barnes GD, Sippola E, Dorsch M
Applying population health approaches to improve safe anticoagulant use in the outpatient setting: the DOAC Dashboard multi-cohort implementation evaluation study protocol.
This paper discusses the study protocol that is being used in the ongoing multi-cohort implementation evaluation study on applying population health approaches to improve safe use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for treatment of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. It is hoped that these approaches will help prevent incorrect dosing which is common and puts patients at risk of adverse events. Population health tools, including interactive dashboards built into the electronic health record (EHR), are being evaluated as a way to improve safe prescribing. A three-phase project is being conducted at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The DOAC Dashboard will be implemented in four new health systems. Quantitative evaluation of the implementation will follow the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Stakeholders will be interviewed as part of the qualitative evaluation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Technology Acceptance Models. The goals of the study are to evaluate the implementation of the EHR-based population health tool, guide the adoption in four new health systems, and evaluate the multi-center implementation effort.
AHRQ-funded; HS026874.
Citation: Barnes GD, Sippola E, Dorsch M .
Applying population health approaches to improve safe anticoagulant use in the outpatient setting: the DOAC Dashboard multi-cohort implementation evaluation study protocol.
Implement Sci 2020 Sep 21;15(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01044-5.
.
.
Keywords: Blood Thinners, Medication, Patient Safety, Implementation, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medical Errors
Samost-Williams A, Nanji KC
A systems theoretic process analysis of the medication use process in the operating room.
While 4 to 10% of medications administered in the operating room may involve an error, few investigations have prospectively modeled how these errors might occur. Systems theoretic process analysis is a prospective risk analysis technique that uses systems theory to identify hazards. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the use of systems theoretic process analysis in a healthcare organization to prospectively identify causal factors for medication errors in the operating room.
AHRQ-funded; HS024764.
Citation: Samost-Williams A, Nanji KC .
A systems theoretic process analysis of the medication use process in the operating room.
Anesthesiology 2020 Aug;133(2):332-41. doi: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003376..
Keywords: Medication, Surgery, Medical Errors, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events
Griffey RT, Schneider RM, Todorov AA
The emergency department trigger tool: a novel approach to screening for quality and safety events.
The goal of this study was to develop an automated version of a previously developed emergency department (ED) trigger tool to track the likelihood of an adverse event. Thirty triggers were associated with risk of harm. The authors identified 1,726 records out of 76,894 ED visits with greater than or equal to 1 trigger. They compared the results of the automated tool to the previous version and found it performed well. They began with a broad set of candidate triggers and validated a computerized query that eliminates the need for manual screening of triggers and also identified a refined set of triggers associated with adverse events in the ED.
AHRQ-funded; HS025052.
Citation: Griffey RT, Schneider RM, Todorov AA .
The emergency department trigger tool: a novel approach to screening for quality and safety events.
Ann Emerg Med 2020 Aug;76(2):230-40. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.032..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Patient Safety, Adverse Events, Medical Errors, Quality of Care, Risk
Miller J, Vitous CA, Boothman RC
Medical error professionals' perspectives on Inter-system medical error discovery (IMED): consensus, divergence, and uncertainty.
Best practices for how to respond are unclear when a medical error is discovered in a different system (inter-system medical error discovery or IMED). This qualitative study explored medical error professionals' views on disclosure, feedback, and reporting in these scenarios. The investigators found that while medical error professionals expressed consensus regarding obligations to disclose obvious errors, they differed on particulars.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Miller J, Vitous CA, Boothman RC .
Medical error professionals' perspectives on Inter-system medical error discovery (IMED): consensus, divergence, and uncertainty.
Medicine 2020 Jul 31;99(31):e21425. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000021425..
Keywords: Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Guidelines
Nanji KC, Merry AF, Shaikh SD KC, Merry AF, Shaikh SD
Global PRoMiSe (Perioperative Recommendations for Medication Safety): protocol for a mixed-methods study.
Medication errors (MEs), which occur commonly in the perioperative period, have the potential to cause patient harm or death. Many published recommendations exist for preventing perioperative MEs; however, many of these recommendations conflict and are often not applicable to middle-income and low-income countries. The goal of this study was to develop and disseminate consensus-based recommendations for perioperative medication safety that were tailored to country income level.
AHRQ-funded; HS024764.
Citation: Nanji KC, Merry AF, Shaikh SD KC, Merry AF, Shaikh SD .
Global PRoMiSe (Perioperative Recommendations for Medication Safety): protocol for a mixed-methods study.
BMJ Open 2020 Jun 30;10(6):e038313. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038313..
Keywords: Medication, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medical Errors
Gandhi TK, Singh H
Reducing the risk of diagnostic error in the COVID-19 era.
This perspective article discusses anticipated diagnoses errors for positive or negative COVID-19 results. The errors are classified using user-friendly nomenclature. Mitigation strategies are discussed including technology for cognitive support, optimized workflow and communication, people-focused interventions, organizational strategies, and state/federal policies and regulations.
AHRQ-funded; HS027363.
Citation: Gandhi TK, Singh H .
Reducing the risk of diagnostic error in the COVID-19 era.
J Hosp Med 2020 Jun;15(6):363-66. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3461..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Risk, Medical Errors, COVID-19
Dadlez NM, Adelman J, Bundy DG
Contributing factors for pediatric ambulatory diagnostic process errors: Project RedDE.
This study examined root causes of three common pediatric diagnostic errors by having 31 practices enrolled in a national QI collaborative perform monthly “mini-RCAs” (mini root cause analyses). The diagnoses errors studied were missed adolescent depression, missed elevated blood pressure, and missed actionable laboratory values. Twenty-eight practices submitted 184 mini-RCAs with the most common causes being patient volume (adolescent depression and elevated BP), inadequate staffing (adolescent depression), clinic milieu (elevated BP), written communication and provider knowledge (actionable laboratory values), and electronic health records (EHRs) – (elevated BP and actionable laboratory values). The median number of mini-RCAs submitted was 6.
AHRQ-funded; HS024538; HS024713; HS026121.
Citation: Dadlez NM, Adelman J, Bundy DG .
Contributing factors for pediatric ambulatory diagnostic process errors: Project RedDE.
Pediatr Qual Saf 2020 May-Jun;5(3):e299. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000299..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety
Cifra CL, Ten Eyck P, Dawson JD
Factors associated with diagnostic error on admission to a PICU: a pilot study.
This pilot retrospective cohort study examined errors in pediatric ICUs (PICUs) for children during the first 12 hours after PICU admission. A structured tool (Safer Dx) was used to identify diagnostic error in an academic tertiary institution. Out of 50 patients, 4 (8%) had diagnostic errors. The errors were in diagnoses of chronic ear infection, intracranial pressure (two cases), and Bartonella encephalitis. This pilot study will be expanded into a larger and more definitive multicenter study.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087.
Citation: Cifra CL, Ten Eyck P, Dawson JD .
Factors associated with diagnostic error on admission to a PICU: a pilot study.
Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020 May;21(5):e311-e15. doi: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002257..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Hospitals
Soleimani J, Pinevich Y, Barwise AK
Feasibility and reliability testing of manual electronic health record reviews as a tool for timely identification of diagnostic error in patients at risk.
Although diagnostic error (DE) is a significant problem, it remains challenging for clinicians to identify it reliably and to recognize its contribution to the clinical trajectory of their patients. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the reliability of real-time electronic health record (EHR) reviews using a search strategy for the identification of DE as a contributor to the rapid response team (RRT) activation. Early and accurate recognition of critical illness is of paramount importance.
AHRQ-funded; HS026609.
Citation: Soleimani J, Pinevich Y, Barwise AK .
Feasibility and reliability testing of manual electronic health record reviews as a tool for timely identification of diagnostic error in patients at risk.
Appl Clin Inform 2020 May;11(3):474-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713750..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety
Giardina TD, Royse KE, Khanna A
Health care provider factors associated with patient-reported adverse events and harm.
This research examined associations between patient-reported contributory factors and patient-related harms experienced after an adverse event (AE). A secondary analysis was conducted of a national sample of patient-reported AEs gathered from an online questionnaire from 2010 to February 2016. Harms were categorized as nonphysical harm only, physical harm only, physical harm and emotional or financial harm, or all three harms. One third (32.6%) of patients reported experiencing all three harms, 25.5% physical harms only, and 14.7% reported nonphysical harms only. Patients reporting all three harms were 2.5 times more likely to have filed a report with authorities and 3.3 times more likely to also have experienced a surgical complication. Odds were also 13% higher of reporting problems related to communication between clinician and patients/families or clinician-related behavioral issues with patients experiencing all three harms.
AHRQ-funded; HS025474.
Citation: Giardina TD, Royse KE, Khanna A .
Health care provider factors associated with patient-reported adverse events and harm.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2020 May;46(5):282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.02.004.
.
.
Keywords: Adverse Events, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Quality of Care
Ogletree AM, Mangrum R, Harris Y
AHRQ Author: Bergofsky L Perfetto D
Omissions of care in nursing home settings: a narrative review.
This review aimed to (1) examine existing definitions of omissions of care in the healthcare environment and associated characteristics and (2) outline adverse events that may be attributable to omissions of care among nursing home populations. The investigators concluded that definitions of omissions of care for nursing homes varied in scope and level of detail. Substantial evidence connected omissions of care with an array of adverse events in nursing home populations.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500014I.
Citation: Ogletree AM, Mangrum R, Harris Y .
Omissions of care in nursing home settings: a narrative review.
J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020 May;21(5):604-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.02.016..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Adverse Events, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Quality of Care
Pfeifer E, Lozovatsky M, Abraham J
Effect of an alternative newborn naming strategy on wrong-patient errors: a quasi-experimental study.
Newborns are often assigned temporary names at birth. Temporary newborn names-often a combination of the mother's last name and the newborn's gender-are vulnerable to patient misidentification due to similarities with other newborns or between a mother and her newborn. In this study, the investigators developed and implemented an alternative distinct naming strategy, and then compared its effectiveness on reducing the number of wrong-patient orders with the standard distinct naming strategy.
AHRQ-funded; HS025443.
Citation: Pfeifer E, Lozovatsky M, Abraham J .
Effect of an alternative newborn naming strategy on wrong-patient errors: a quasi-experimental study.
Appl Clin Inform 2020 Mar;11(2):235-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705175..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety
Sheehan SE, Safdar N, Singh H
Detection and remediation of misidentification errors in radiology examination ordering.
In this study, the investigators described the pilot testing of a quality improvement methodology using electronic trigger tools and preimaging checklists to detect "wrong-side" misidentification errors in radiology examination ordering, and to measure staff adherence to departmental policy in error remediation. The investigators concluded that their trigger tool enabled the detection of substantially more imaging ordering misidentification errors than preimaging safety checklists alone, with a high positive predictive value.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087; HS017820.
Citation: Sheehan SE, Safdar N, Singh H .
Detection and remediation of misidentification errors in radiology examination ordering.
Appl Clin Inform 2020 Jan;11(1):79-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402730..
Keywords: Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety, Imaging, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Banerjee A, Burden A, Slagle JM
Key performance gaps of practicing anesthesiologists: how they contribute to hazards in anesthesiology and proposals for addressing them.
This study analyzed performance gaps of practicing anesthesiologists, and used 4 different scenarios that illustrate those gaps and how they contribute to hazards in anesthesiology and proposals for addressing them. The authors used 4 standardized simulated scenarios of common events that anesthesiologists would expect to see in their practice. The 4 perioperative crisis events are: (1) local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) leading to hemodynamic collapse; (2) retroperitoneal bleeding from insertion of a laparoscopic surgery trocar leading to hemorrhagic shock; (3) malignant hyperthermia (MH) presenting in the postanesthesia care unit; and (4) acute atrial fibrillation with hemodynamic instability, followed by signs of a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (AFib-MI). These scenarios came from a 2017 paper by Weinger, et al. A group of subject matter experts defined a set of clinical performance elements (CPEs) that they would expect to be performed in the scenarios. Only 4% of encounters in these scenarios had perfect performance by anesthesiologists where all prescribed CPEs were performed. Recommendations for improvement included providing high-fidelity simulation training, incorporating clinical lessons about gaps, fostering regular use by anesthesiologists and OR teams of clinical guidance, modifying organizational arrangements at clinical sites to ensure backup help is readily available, and implementing periodic formative performance assessments.
AHRQ-funded; HS020415.
Citation: Banerjee A, Burden A, Slagle JM .
Key performance gaps of practicing anesthesiologists: how they contribute to hazards in anesthesiology and proposals for addressing them.
Int Anesthesiol Clin 2020 Winter;58(1):13-20. doi: 10.1097/aia.0000000000000262..
Keywords: Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Patient Safety, Provider Performance, Provider: Physician, Provider, Surgery