National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedReiter-Palmon R, Kennel V, Allen JA
Naturalistic decision making in after-action review meetings: the implementation of and learning from post-fall huddles.
In this study, the authors added to our understanding of Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) in healthcare and how After Action Reviews (AARs) can be utilized as a learning tool to reduce errors. They found that the use of self-guided post-fall huddles increased over the time of the project, the types of errors identified as contributing to the patient fall changed, and the proportion of falls with less adverse effects increased during the project time period. They concluded that , over time, self-guided AARs can be useful for some aspects of learning from errors.
AHRQ-funded; HS021429.
Citation: Reiter-Palmon R, Kennel V, Allen JA .
Naturalistic decision making in after-action review meetings: the implementation of and learning from post-fall huddles.
J Occup Organ Psychol 2015 Jun;88(2):322-40. doi: 10.1111/joop.12084.
.
.
Keywords: Adverse Events, Falls, Shared Decision Making, Medical Errors, Patient Safety
Dahlke AR, Merkow RP, Chung JW
Comparison of postoperative complication risk prediction approaches based on factors known preoperatively to surgeons versus patients.
The objective of this paper was to compare three estimation models: (1) the All Information Model; (2) the Surgeon Assessment Model; and (3) the Patient-Entered Model. The investigators observed a small decline in model performance that they suggest may not be clinically meaningful. They concluded that the Surgeon Assessment and Patient-Entered models with fewer predictors can be used with relative confidence to predict a patient's risk.
AHRQ-funded; HS021857.
Citation: Dahlke AR, Merkow RP, Chung JW .
Comparison of postoperative complication risk prediction approaches based on factors known preoperatively to surgeons versus patients.
Surgery 2014 Jul;156(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.002.
.
.
Keywords: Adverse Events, Shared Decision Making, Risk, Surgery