National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedGreenberg JK, Otun A, Kyaw PT
Usability and acceptability of clinical decision support based on the KIIDS-TBI tool for children with mild traumatic brain injuries and intracranial injuries.
The Kids Intracranial Injury Decision Support tool for Traumatic Brain Injury (KIIDS-TBI) is a validated risk prediction model designed to manage children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) and intracranial injuries. Implementing electronic clinical decision support (CDS) may help integrate this evidence-based guidance into clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the acceptability and usability of an electronic CDS tool for managing children with mTBI and intracranial injuries. Emergency medicine and neurosurgery physicians (10 each) from 10 hospitals in the United States participated in usability testing of a novel CDS prototype within a simulated electronic health record environment. The testing involved a think-aloud protocol, an acceptability and usability survey, and a semi-structured interview. The prototype underwent two updates during testing based on user feedback. Usability issues identified in the videos were categorized using content analysis, while interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. The study found that of the 20 participants, the majority worked at teaching hospitals (80%), freestanding children's hospitals (95%), and level-1 trauma centers (75%). During the two prototype updates, issues with clarity of terminology and navigation within the CDS interface were identified and resolved. As a result, the number of usability problems decreased from 35 in phase 1 to 8 in phase 3, and the number of errors made dropped from 18 in phase 1 to 2 in phase 3. According to the survey, 90% of participants found the tool easy to use, 95% found the tool useful in determining a patient's level of care, 90% found it likely to improve resource utilization, and 79% found it likely to improve patient safety. Interview themes focused on the CDS's capability to support evidence-based decision-making and enhance clinical workflow, as well as suggested implementation strategies and potential challenges.
AHRQ-funded; HS027075.
Citation: Greenberg JK, Otun A, Kyaw PT .
Usability and acceptability of clinical decision support based on the KIIDS-TBI tool for children with mild traumatic brain injuries and intracranial injuries.
Appl Clin Inform 2022 Mar; 13(2):456-67. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1745829..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Brain Injury, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Carroll AE, Bauer NS, Dugan TM
Use of a computerized decision aid for developmental surveillance and screening: a randomized clinical trial.
A study to determine whether a computerized clinical decision support system is an effective approach to improve standardized developmental surveillance and screening (DSS) within primary care practices found that use of such a system significantly increased the number of children screened at 9, 18, and 30 months of age. It also increased the number of children who ultimately were diagnosed as having a developmental delay.
AHRQ-funded; HS017939
Citation: Carroll AE, Bauer NS, Dugan TM .
Use of a computerized decision aid for developmental surveillance and screening: a randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Sep;168(9):815-21. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.464..
Keywords: Health Information Technology (HIT), Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Primary Care, Children/Adolescents
Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
In this study, the investigators examine the attitudes and opinions of pediatric users' toward the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, a computer decision support system linked to an electronic health record in four community pediatric clinics. The investigators found that pediatric users appreciated the system's automation and enhancements that allowed relevant and meaningful clinical data to be accessible at point of care.
AHRQ-funded; HS018453; HS017939.
Citation: Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM .
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):146-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001851..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Primary Care
Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
In this study, the investigators examine the attitudes and opinions of pediatric users' toward the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, a computer decision support system linked to an electronic health record in four community pediatric clinics. The investigators found that pediatric users appreciated the system's automation and enhancements that allowed relevant and meaningful clinical data to be accessible at point of care.
AHRQ-funded; HS018453; HS017939.
Citation: Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM .
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):146-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001851..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Primary Care