National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedMartin BI, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN
Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.
The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) provided a unique opportunity to examine the validity of a claims-based algorithm for grouping patients by surgical indication. SPORT enrolled patients for lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. The researchers found that their claims-based hierarchical coding algorithm of spine-related medical encounters correctly classified more than 90 percent of Medicare patients into their respective SPORT cohorts.
AHRQ-funded; HS018405
Citation: Martin BI, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN .
Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.
Spine. 2014 Apr 20;39(9):769-79. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000275..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Surgery, Outcomes, Medicare
Jones WS, Dolor RJ, Hasselblad V
Comparative effectiveness of endovascular and surgical revascularization for patients with peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischemia: systematic review of revascularization in critical limb ischemia.
This systematic review found that there is no difference in clinical outcomes for patients with critical limb ischemia treated with endovascular or surgical revascularization. This review of 23 studies found no differences in overall death, amputation, or amputation-free survival at 2 or more years following treatment.
AHRQ-funded; 290200710066I
Citation: Jones WS, Dolor RJ, Hasselblad V .
Comparative effectiveness of endovascular and surgical revascularization for patients with peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischemia: systematic review of revascularization in critical limb ischemia.
Am Heart J. 2014 Apr;167(4):489-498.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.012..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Outcomes, Surgery, Mortality
Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J
The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of graft size on patient-reported outcomes and revision risk after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It found that smaller hamstring autograft size is a predictor of poorer Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (sport/recreation subscale function) 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction.
AHRQ-funded; HS016075.
Citation: Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J .
The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study.
Arthroscopy 2013 Dec;29(12):1948-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.025.
Keywords: Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Comparative Effectiveness, Surgery
Suskind AM, Clemens JQ, Dunn RL
Effectiveness of mesh compared with nonmesh sling surgery in Medicare beneficiaries.
This study assessed the effectiveness of mesh compared to nonmesh slings in the surgical treatment of female incontinence. It found that overall rates of complications were similar for patients undergoing either mesh or nonmesh sling procedures. However, patients undergoing the nonmesh procedure were more likely to require a subsequent intervention for bladder outlet obstruction.
AHRQ-funded; HS018726.
Citation: Suskind AM, Clemens JQ, Dunn RL .
Effectiveness of mesh compared with nonmesh sling surgery in Medicare beneficiaries.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;122(3):546-52. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829e8543..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Elderly, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Surgery, Women, Outcomes, Medicare, Evidence-Based Practice
Jonsson Funk M, Visco AG, Weidner AC
Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
This study estimated the rate of repeat surgery after vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. The researchers found that the overall risk of any future surgery was higher in the women receiving mesh; however, native tissue and vaginal mesh surgery had similar 5-year risks for recurrent prolapse.
AHRQ-funded; HS017950
Citation: Jonsson Funk M, Visco AG, Weidner AC .
Long-term outcomes of vaginal mesh versus native tissue repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Aug;24(8):1279-85. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2043-9..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Surgery, Women, Outcomes, Risk