National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Cultural Competence (1)
- Diabetes (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Health Promotion (1)
- Medicaid (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (2)
- Public Reporting (1)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality of Care (2)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Screening (1)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (6)
- Social Stigma (1)
- (-) Vulnerable Populations (6)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedBi S, Gunter KE, Lopez FY
Improving shared decision making for Asian American Pacific Islander sexual and gender minorities.
This study examined the challenges Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) sexual and gender minorities (SGM) encounter with shared decision making (SDM) with their providers, especially concerning mental health. Focus groups were conducted in San Francisco and interviews were conducted in Chicago and San Francisco. The participants were surveyed about attitudes towards SGM disclosure and preferences about providers. Many participants felt that providers either ignored or overemphasized their identities. Some shared the stigma of SGM identities and effects on mental health in their own families.
AHRQ-funded; HS023050.
Citation: Bi S, Gunter KE, Lopez FY .
Improving shared decision making for Asian American Pacific Islander sexual and gender minorities.
Med Care 2019 Dec;57(12):937-44. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001212..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Vulnerable Populations, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Behavioral Health, Social Stigma
Castaneda-Guarderas A, Glassbereg J, Grudzen CR
Shared decision making with vulnerable populations in the emergency department.
The authors introduce a research agenda that includes community-engaged approaches, mixed-methods studies, and cost-effectiveness analyses to address questions of shared decision making (SDM) among vulnerable groups at a disadvantage in the healthcare system, as well as changes that are needed, and how to cultivate and teach these competencies.
AHRQ-funded; HS024172.
Citation: Castaneda-Guarderas A, Glassbereg J, Grudzen CR .
Shared decision making with vulnerable populations in the emergency department.
Acad Emerg Med 2016 Dec;23(12):1410-16. doi: 10.1111/acem.13134.
.
.
Keywords: Cultural Competence, Shared Decision Making, Emergency Department, Patient and Family Engagement, Vulnerable Populations
Goff SL, Mazor KM, Pekow PS
Patient navigators and parent use of quality data: a randomized trial.
The authors explored the effectiveness of strategies to overcome barriers in vulnerable populations. They found that an intervention to reduce barriers to using publicly reported health care quality data had a modest effect on patient choice, suggesting that factors other than performance on common publicly reported quality metrics have a stronger influence on which pediatric practices women choose.
AHRQ-funded; HS021864.
Citation: Goff SL, Mazor KM, Pekow PS .
Patient navigators and parent use of quality data: a randomized trial.
Pediatrics 2016 Oct;138(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1140.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Quality of Care, Public Reporting, Quality Indicators (QIs), Vulnerable Populations
Longo DR, Crabtree BF, Pellerano MB
A qualitative study of vulnerable patient views of type 2 diabetes consumer reports.
This study aims to identify whether vulnerable populations with type 2 diabetes perceive consumer reports as helpful in making decisions about diabetes care. It found that participants in 18 focus groups expressed minimal interest in currently available consumer reports. They instead listed personal referrals and interpersonal interactions among the most important factors when choosing a physician.
AHRQ-funded; HS021902.
Citation: Longo DR, Crabtree BF, Pellerano MB .
A qualitative study of vulnerable patient views of type 2 diabetes consumer reports.
Patient 2016 Jun;9(3):231-40. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0146-8..
Keywords: Education: Patient and Caregiver, Shared Decision Making, Diabetes, Quality of Care, Vulnerable Populations
Brenner AT, Gupta S, Ko LK
Development of a practical model for targeting patient decision support interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening in vulnerable populations.
The authors sought to develop a practical model for predicting probability of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion in a diverse safety-net population and a subsequent framework for targeting screening promotion interventions. Their model and framework may be useful for designing and delivering targeted interventions to promote CRC screening.
AHRQ-funded; HS013853.
Citation: Brenner AT, Gupta S, Ko LK .
Development of a practical model for targeting patient decision support interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening in vulnerable populations.
J Health Care Poor Underserved 2016;27(2):465-78. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0090.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Health Promotion, Screening, Vulnerable Populations
Fischer MA, Allen-Coleman C, Farrell SF
Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.
Because children, pregnant women and people with mental illness have generally been underrepresented in research discussions, comparative effectiveness rsearch (CER) questions for these groups may be understudied. To address this problem, AHRQ commissioned a team to work with Medicaid Medical Directors and other stakeholders to identify relevant CER questions. Through an iterative process of topic identification and refinement, they developed relevant, feasible and actionable questions based on issues affecting Medicaid programs nationwide.
AHRQ-funded; 290200500161.
Citation: Fischer MA, Allen-Coleman C, Farrell SF .
Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.
J Comp Eff Res 2015 Sep;4(5):465-71. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.26.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Medicaid, Research Methodologies, Shared Decision Making, Vulnerable Populations