National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- (-) Cancer (6)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Lung Cancer (1)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (2)
- Communication (2)
- Disparities (1)
- Genetics (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Healthcare Utilization (1)
- Medicaid (1)
- (-) Patient-Centered Healthcare (6)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- Teams (2)
- Treatments (1)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedLee SJ, Clark MA, Cox JV
Achieving coordinated care for patients with complex cases of cancer: a multiteam system approach.
The authors outlined challenges of care coordination in the context of a multiteam system (MTS), through the care experience of a patient in the Dallas County integrated safety-net system. A cancer diagnosis triggered an additional need for augmented coordination between his different provider teams. The authors recommend that further research and practice investigate the relationships of MTS coordination for shared care management, transfer to and from specialty care, treatment compliance, barriers to care, and health outcomes of chronic comorbid conditions, as well as cancer control and surveillance.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Lee SJ, Clark MA, Cox JV .
Achieving coordinated care for patients with complex cases of cancer: a multiteam system approach.
J Oncol Pract 2016 Nov;12(11):1029-38. doi: 10.1200/jop.2016.013664.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Care Coordination, Chronic Conditions, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Teams
Gerber DE, Reimer T, Williams EL
Resolving rivalries and realigning goals: challenges of clinical and research multiteam systems.
This article describes the care processes for a 64-year-old man with newly diagnosed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who was enrolled in a first-line clinical trial of a new immunotherapy regimen. Research team and clinical team members have limited knowledge of the roles and work of individuals outside their team. Recommendations to increase trust and collaboration are provided.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Gerber DE, Reimer T, Williams EL .
Resolving rivalries and realigning goals: challenges of clinical and research multiteam systems.
J Oncol Pract 2016 Nov;12(11):1020-28. doi: 10.1200/jop.2016.013060.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Case Study, Healthcare Delivery, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Teams
Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
The researchers identified patient-centered communication strategies/gaps for discussing Oncotype DX testing (ODX) results. They applied a patient-centered communication framework to analyze qualitative interviews with oncologists about how they communicate about ODX with patients. Overall, providers discussed four patient-centered communication domains: exchanging information, assessing uncertainty, making decisions and cross-cutting themes.
AHRQ-funded; HS019468; HS022189.
Citation: Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M .
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
Cancer Invest 2016 May 27;34(5):205-12. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2016.1172637.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Communication, Clinician-Patient Communication, Shared Decision Making, Genetics, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Women
Ellis CT, Samuel CA, Stitzenberg KB
National trends in nonoperative management of rectal adenocarcinoma.
The researchers examined the use of non-operative management (NOM) for rectal cancer over time and the patient- and facility-level factors associated with its use. They found evidence of increasing NOM use, with this increase occurring more frequently in black and uninsured/Medicaid patients, raising concern that increased NOM use may actually represent increasing disparities in rectal cancer care rather than innovation. They recommended further studies to assess survival differences by treatment strategy.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032.
Citation: Ellis CT, Samuel CA, Stitzenberg KB .
National trends in nonoperative management of rectal adenocarcinoma.
J Clin Oncol 2016 May 10;34(14):1644-51. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.2066.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Disparities, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Treatments
Kohler RE, Goyal RK, Lich KH
Association between medical home enrollment and health care utilization and costs among breast cancer patients in a state Medicaid program.
The objective of this study was to examine health care utilization and expenditures as a function of patient-centered medical home (PCMH) enrollment among breast cancer patients in North Carolina’s Medicaid program. It found that PCMH enrollment was significantly associated with greater outpatient service use, but there was no difference in the probability of inpatient hospitalizations or ED visits.
AHRQ-funded; HS019468.
Citation: Kohler RE, Goyal RK, Lich KH .
Association between medical home enrollment and health care utilization and costs among breast cancer patients in a state Medicaid program.
Cancer 2015 Nov 15;121(22):3975-81. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29596..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Healthcare Utilization, Medicaid, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Morgans AK, Schapira L
Confronting therapeutic failure: a conversation guide.
The authors review the classic six-step SPIKES (setting, perception, invitation for information, knowledge, empathy, summarize and strategize) protocol for giving bad news that has been widely adopted since it was first published in this journal in 2005. They also offer practical tips derived from a thorough review of the evidence and our clinical experience.
AHRQ-funded; HS022990.
Citation: Morgans AK, Schapira L .
Confronting therapeutic failure: a conversation guide.
Oncologist 2015 Aug;20(8):946-51. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0050..
Keywords: Cancer, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research