National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Access to Care (4)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (2)
- Behavioral Health (7)
- Blood Pressure (1)
- Children/Adolescents (3)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Dementia (1)
- Dental and Oral Health (1)
- Depression (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Elderly (2)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (1)
- (-) Healthcare Costs (58)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Healthcare Utilization (6)
- (-) Health Insurance (58)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Health Status (1)
- Hospitalization (3)
- Hospitals (4)
- Labor and Delivery (1)
- Long-Term Care (1)
- Low-Income (3)
- Maternal Care (1)
- Medicaid (10)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (12)
- Medicare (14)
- Medication (6)
- Neurological Disorders (1)
- Opioids (1)
- Orthopedics (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (2)
- Payment (10)
- Policy (17)
- Pregnancy (3)
- Primary Care (2)
- Quality of Care (2)
- Sexual Health (1)
- Social Determinants of Health (2)
- Substance Abuse (2)
- Surgery (6)
- Uninsured (1)
- Women (3)
- Young Adults (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 58 Research Studies DisplayedBernard DM, Selden TM, Fang Z
AHRQ Author: Bernard
The joint distribution of high out-of-pocket burdens, medical debt, and financial barriers to needed care.
This AHRQ-authored paper examined the joint distribution of three financial problems related to healthcare: high out-of-pocket burdens, medical debt, and financial barriers to needed care. The authors applied relatively strict definitions of financial problems to data from the 2018-2019 MEPS and found that 27% of nonsenior adults lived in families with at least one of the three financial strains assessed. The percentage of participants who faced more broadly defined financial problems was 45.5%. This prevalence varied across sociodemographic characteristics, families' health care needs, insurance coverage, and financial resources.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Bernard DM, Selden TM, Fang Z .
The joint distribution of high out-of-pocket burdens, medical debt, and financial barriers to needed care.
Health Aff 2023 Nov; 42(11):1517-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00604..
Keywords: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Healthcare Costs, Access to Care, Health Insurance
Scott JW, Neiman PU, Scott KW
High deductibles are associated with severe disease, catastrophic out-of-pocket payments for emergency surgical conditions.
This retrospective analysis of claims data examined the association of a high-deductible health insurance plan (HDHP) with severe disease and catastrophic out-of-pocket payments for emergency surgical conditions (e.g., appendicitis, cholecystitis, diverticulitis, and intestinal obstruction). Primary outcome was disease severity at presentation-determined using ICD-10-CM diagnoses codes and based on validated measures of anatomic severity (e.g., perforation, abscess, diffuse peritonitis). The secondary outcome was catastrophic out-of-pocket spending, defined by the World Health Organization as out-of-pocket spending >10% of annual income. Among 43,516 patients [mean age 48.4 years; 51% female], 41% were enrolled in HDHPs. Despite being younger, healthier, wealthier, and more educated, HDHP enrollees were more likely to present with more severe disease (28.5% vs 21.3%); even after adjusting for relevant demographics. HDHP enrollees were also more likely to incur 30-day out-of-pocket spending that exceeded 10% of annual income (20.8% vs 6.4%).
AHRQ-funded; HS027788; HS028672.
Citation: Scott JW, Neiman PU, Scott KW .
High deductibles are associated with severe disease, catastrophic out-of-pocket payments for emergency surgical conditions.
Ann Surg 2023 Oct 1; 278(4):e667-e74. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005819..
Keywords: Health Insurance, Healthcare Costs, Payment, Surgery
Mellor JM, McInerney M, Garrow RC
The impact of Medicaid expansion on spending and utilization by older low-income Medicare beneficiaries.
This study examined indirect spillover effects of Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansions to working-age adults on health care coverage, spending, and utilization by older low-income Medicare beneficiaries. The authors used data from the 2010-2018 Health and Retirement Study survey linked to annual Medicare beneficiary summary files. They estimated individual-level difference-in-differences models of total spending for inpatient, institutional outpatient, physician/professional provider services; inpatient stays, outpatient visits, physician visits; and Medicaid and Part A and B Medicare coverage. They also compared changes in outcomes before and after Medicaid expansion in expansion versus nonexpansion states. The sample included low-income respondents aged 69 and older with linked Medicare data, enrolled in full-year traditional Medicare, and living in the community. ACA Medicaid expansion was associated with a 9.8 percentage point increase in Medicaid coverage, a 4.4 percentage point increase in having any institutional outpatient spending, and a positive but statistically insignificant 2.4 percentage point change in Part B enrollment.
AHRQ-funded; HS025422.
Citation: Mellor JM, McInerney M, Garrow RC .
The impact of Medicaid expansion on spending and utilization by older low-income Medicare beneficiaries.
Health Serv Res 2023 Oct; 58(5):1024-34. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14155..
Keywords: Medicaid, Medicare, Low-Income, Healthcare Utilization, Healthcare Costs, Health Insurance
Jazowski SA, Vaidya AU, Donohue JM
Commercial health plan and enrollee out-of-pocket spending on accelerated approval products in 2019.
Accelerated approval products, including those of low or uncertain therapeutic value, have cost Medicare and Medicaid billions of dollars annually. The financial implications of this program for commercial payers is unknown. The purpose of this study was to estimate health plan and out-of-pocket spending on product indication pairs (products provided accelerated approval for specific indications) that did and did not confirm clinical benefit. The study found that commercial health plan spending on 93 product indication pairs totaled $1.3 billion in 2019. When this amount was extrapolated to all US ESI plans, the total equaled $9.0 billion. Health plans spent over double on product-indication pairs converted to full approval based on surrogate end points when compared to those based on clinical end points. Health plan expenditures on product-indication pairs not yet converted to full approval equaled $261.9 million ($1.9 billion for all US ESI plans). Sixty-nine percent of that amount was ascribed to those with post-marketing studies within FDA deadlines. Out-of-pocket spending totaled $17.5million, or $125.5 million for all US ESI enrollees. Fewer than one-fifth of enrollees pending was on product-indication pairs converted to full approval based on clinical end points. Of the $5.9 million spent on product-indication pairs not yet converted to full approval, 46%was ascribed to those with post-marketing studies within FDA deadlines.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Jazowski SA, Vaidya AU, Donohue JM .
Commercial health plan and enrollee out-of-pocket spending on accelerated approval products in 2019.
JAMA Intern Med 2023 Sep; 183(9):1016-18. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2381..
Keywords: Health Insurance, Healthcare Costs
Eddelbuettel JCP, Barry CL, Kennedy-Hendricks A
High-deductible health plans and nonfatal opioid overdose.
This study examined whether an employer offering a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) had an impact on nonfatal opioid overdose among commercially insured individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) in the United States. The authors used deidentified insurance claims data from 2007 to 2017 with 97,788 person-years. They estimated the change in the probability of a nonfatal opioid overdose among enrollees with OUD whose employers began offering an HDHP insurance option during the study period compared with the change among those whose employer never offered an HDHP. Across both groups, 2% of the sample experienced a nonfatal opioid overdose during the study period. They found no association of HDHP with an observed increase in the probability of nonfatal opioid overdose among commercially insured person-years with OUD.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: Eddelbuettel JCP, Barry CL, Kennedy-Hendricks A .
High-deductible health plans and nonfatal opioid overdose.
Med Care 2023 Sep; 61(9):601-04. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001886..
Keywords: Healthcare Costs, Health Insurance, Opioids, Substance Abuse, Behavioral Health
Hill SC, Jacobs PD, Johnson CA
AHRQ Author: Hill SC, Jacobs PD
Availability of off-marketplace plans with lower premiums for higher-income families.
Prior to 2021, families with incomes above 400% of the federal poverty level were ineligible for marketplace premium tax credits and may again be after 2025. This income cap was temporarily removed by current laws, but some higher-income families still receive zero tax credits because credits limit out-of-pocket premiums for a reference plan as a portion of income. The purpose of this study was to quantify 2 variables: 1) premium variations between on- and off-marketplace plans and 2) the relationship between these premium variations and state decisions to finance cost-sharing reductions (CSRs) for lower-income families. The researchers developed a comprehensive database of on- and off-marketplace plans in each county and compared on- and off-marketplace plan premiums in 2020 and the rates of growth in the numbers of plans. The study found that in 2020, 89% of the United States population lived in counties with an availability of plans offered only off-marketplace. In those counties premiums for the lowest-cost off-marketplace plans averaged 11.3% less than premiums for the lowest-cost on-marketplace plans. In comparison the lowest-cost off-marketplace plans were more expensive on average. Silver plan premiums were 6.1% higher off-marketplace than on-marketplace in states that loaded CSRs on all silver plans, and 13.5% lower in states that loaded CSRs only on on-marketplace silver plans.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Hill SC, Jacobs PD, Johnson CA .
Availability of off-marketplace plans with lower premiums for higher-income families.
Am J Manag Care 2023 Jul; 29(7):371-76. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89397..
Keywords: Health Insurance, Healthcare Costs
Carlton EF, Becker NV, Moniz MH
Out-of-pocket spending for non-birth-related hospitalizations of privately insured US children, 2017 to 2019.
This study’s goal was to estimate out-of-pocket spending for non-birth pediatric hospitalizations of privately insured children from 2017 to 2019. This study used data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. Among 183,780 hospitalizations, half were for female children, with a median age of 12 (4-16) years. Most (79.0%) hospitalizations were for children with a chronic condition and 24.1% were covered by a high-deductible health plan. Mean (SD) and median (IQR) out-of-pocket spending per hospitalization was $1313 and $656 respectively. Out-of-pocket spending exceeded $3000 for 14.0% of hospitalizations. Factors associated with higher out-of-pocket spending included hospitalization in quarter 1 compared with quarter 4 (average marginal effect [AME], $637) and lack of chronic conditions compared with having a complex chronic condition (AME, $732). Hospitalizations covered by the least generous plans (deductible of $3000 or more and coinsurance of 20% or more) found mean out-of-pocket spending was $1974, while the most generous plans (deductible less than $1000 and coinsurance of 1-19%), mean out-of-pocket spending was found to be $826.
AHRQ-funded; HS025465; HS028817.
Citation: Carlton EF, Becker NV, Moniz MH .
Out-of-pocket spending for non-birth-related hospitalizations of privately insured US children, 2017 to 2019.
JAMA Pediatr 2023 May; 177(5):516-25. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.0130..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Healthcare Costs, Hospitalization, Health Insurance
Treasure G, Anderson DM, Hatcher L
Plan selection, enrollee risk, and health spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act individual marketplaces, 2019.
This study’s goal was to describe individual Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace enrollees’ metal tier selections by risk score and assess enrollees’ health spending by metal tier, risk score, and spending type. This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed claims data from the Wakely Consulting Group ACA database including enrollees with continuous, full-year enrollment in on-exchange or off-exchange ACA-qualified health plans during the 2019 contract year. Enrollment totals, total spending, and out-of-pocket cost were calculated, stratified by metal tier and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk score for 2019. Enrollment and claims data were obtained for 1,317,707 enrollees (53.5% female; mean age, 46.35 years) across all census areas, age groups, and sexes. Of this cohort, 34.6% were on plans with cost-sharing reductions (CSRs), 75.5% did not have an assigned HCC, and 84.0% submitted at least 1 claim. Enrollees were more likely to be classified in the top HHS-HCC risk quartile if they selected platinum (42.0%), gold (34.4%), or silver (29.7%) plans compared with enrollees in bronze plans (17.2%). Median total spending was lower among bronze plan enrollees ($593; interquartile range (IQR), $28-$2100) vs platinum ($4111; IQR, $992-$15,821) or gold ($2675; IQR, $728-$9070).
AHRQ-funded; HS026395.
Citation: Treasure G, Anderson DM, Hatcher L .
Plan selection, enrollee risk, and health spending on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act individual marketplaces, 2019.
JAMA Netw Open 2023 Mar; 6(3):e234529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4529..
Keywords: Health Insurance, Healthcare Costs, Policy
Friedman S, Xu H, Azocar F
Carve-out plan financial requirements associated with national behavioral health parity.
The authors examined changes in carve-out financial requirements following the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA). They found that the MHPAEA was associated with increased generosity in most observed financial requirements, but increased use of deductibles may have reduced generosity for some patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS024866.
Citation: Friedman S, Xu H, Azocar F .
Carve-out plan financial requirements associated with national behavioral health parity.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(6):924-31. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13542..
Keywords: Behavioral Health, Healthcare Costs, Health Insurance, Access to Care, Policy
Henke RM, Karaca Z, Gibson TB
Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations and childbirth outcomes.
This study examined the impact of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to childbirth outcomes. States that use Medicaid ACOs were compared with states that had not adopted ACO. Using HCUP data, the relationship between Medicaid ACO adoption and neonatal and maternal outcomes, and cost per birth was examined. Medicaid ACO implementation was associated with a moderate reduction in hospital costs per birth and decreased cesarean section rates with results varying by state. There was no association with other birth outcomes, including infant inpatient mortality, low birthweight, neonatal intensive care unit utilization and severe maternal morbidity.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201300002C.
Citation: Henke RM, Karaca Z, Gibson TB .
Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations and childbirth outcomes.
Med Care Res Rev 2020 Dec;77(6):559-73. doi: 10.1177/1077558718823132..
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Medicaid, Health Insurance, Healthcare Costs, Labor and Delivery, Pregnancy, Women, Outcomes
Zhou RA, Beaulieu ND, Cutler D
Primary care quality and cost for privately insured patients in and out of US health systems: evidence from four states.
The purpose of this study was to characterize physician health system membership in four states between 2012 and 2016 and to compare primary care quality and cost between in-system providers and non-system providers for the commercially insured population. Investigators concluded that a growing share of physicians were part of a health system from 2012 to 2016.
AHRQ-funded; HS024072.
Citation: Zhou RA, Beaulieu ND, Cutler D .
Primary care quality and cost for privately insured patients in and out of US health systems: evidence from four states.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1098-106. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13590.
.
.
Keywords: Primary Care, Quality of Care, Health Insurance, Healthcare Costs
Dalton VK, Moniz MH, Bailey MJ
Trends in birth rates after elimination of cost sharing for contraception by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Researchers evaluated changes in birth rates by income level among commercially insured women before (2008-2013) and after (2014-2018) the elimination of cost sharing for contraception under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The analytic sample included over 4.5 million women enrolled in 47,721 health plans. In this cross-sectional study, the researchers found that the elimination of cost sharing for contraception under the ACA was associated with improvements in contraceptive method prescription fills and a decrease in births among commercially insured women. Women with low income had more precipitous decreases than women with higher income, suggesting that enhanced access to contraception may address well-documented income-related disparities in unintended birth rates.
AHRQ-funded; HS025465; HS023784.
Citation: Dalton VK, Moniz MH, Bailey MJ .
Trends in birth rates after elimination of cost sharing for contraception by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
JAMA Netw Open 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24398..
Keywords: Policy, Health Insurance, Women, Healthcare Costs, Pregnancy, Sexual Health
Wisk LE, Peltz A, Galbraith AA
Changes in health care-related financial burden for US families with children associated with the Affordable Care Act.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) sought to improve access and affordability of health insurance. Although most ACA policies targeted childless adults, the extent to which these policies also impacted families with children remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in health care-related financial burden for US families with children before and after the ACA was implemented based on income eligibility for ACA policies.
AHRQ-funded; HS024700.
Citation: Wisk LE, Peltz A, Galbraith AA .
Changes in health care-related financial burden for US families with children associated with the Affordable Care Act.
JAMA Pediatr 2020 Nov;174(11):1032-40. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3973..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Healthcare Costs, Health Insurance, Policy, Access to Care
Roberts ET, McGarry BE, Glynn A
Cognition and take-up of the Medicare Savings Programs.
In this study, the investigators examined the association between cognition and Medicare Savings Program (MSP) enrollment among elderly Medicare beneficiaries who qualified for these programs. They also examined enrollment in the Low-Income Subsidy (LIS), a separate program that provides premium and cost-sharing assistance in Medicare Part D that Medicare beneficiaries automatically received if they are enrolled in an MSP.
AHRQ-funded; HS026727.
Citation: Roberts ET, McGarry BE, Glynn A .
Cognition and take-up of the Medicare Savings Programs.
JAMA Intern Med 2020 Nov;180(11):1529-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2783..
Keywords: Elderly, Medicare, Health Insurance, Healthcare Costs, Low-Income, Dementia, Neurological Disorders
Hill SC, Miller GE, Ding Y
AHRQ Author: Hill SC, Miller GE, Ding Y
Net spending on retail specialty drugs grew rapidly, especially for private insurance and Medicare Part D.
This study examined net spending trends on retail specialty drugs from 2010 to 2017. Spending has been difficult to measure due to proprietary rebate payments by manufacturers by insurers, pharmacy benefit managers and state Medicaid agencies. The authors incorporated those rebates into their research. They found that specialty drugs accounted for 37.7% of retail and mail-order prescription spending net of rebates in 2016-17. The spending net of rebates tripled for Medicare Part D beneficiaries and more than doubled for people with private insurance from 2010 to 2017. Medicaid net spending of rebates had a slower increase.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Hill SC, Miller GE, Ding Y .
Net spending on retail specialty drugs grew rapidly, especially for private insurance and Medicare Part D.
Health Aff 2020 Nov;39(11):1970-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01830..
Keywords: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Healthcare Costs, Medication, Medicare, Health Insurance
Fung V, Price M, Nierenberg AA
Assessment of behavioral health services use among low-income Medicare beneficiaries after reductions in coinsurance fees.
This study looked at outcomes from reducing behavioral health care Medicare coinsurance from 50% to 20% from 2009 to 2013. The sample of patients looked at included some diagnosed with SMI (serious mental illness) including schizophrenia, bipolar, or major depressive disorder). Data analysis was performed on 793,275 beneficiaries with SMI in 2008 and compared them with costs in 2013. The mean adjusted out-of-pocket costs for outpatient behavioral care decreased from $132 annually to $64, but the number of visits only increased slightly. No association was found between cost-sharing reductions and changes in behavioral health care visits.
AHRQ-funded; HS024725.
Citation: Fung V, Price M, Nierenberg AA .
Assessment of behavioral health services use among low-income Medicare beneficiaries after reductions in coinsurance fees.
JAMA Netw Open 2020 Oct;3(10):e2019854. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19854..
Keywords: Medicare, Health Insurance, Depression, Behavioral Health, Low-Income, Healthcare Costs, Healthcare Utilization
Nicholas LH, Wu S
Do Medicare Advantage rebates reduce enrollees' out-of-pocket spending?
Researchers used survey data on Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries' actual out-of-pocket spending linked to MA payment information to test whether higher plan payments and rebates lowered enrollee out-of-pocket spending. They found that beneficiaries recovered only $0.65 of every $1.00 in payments exceeding fee-for-service spending through lower out-of-pocket spending but more than fully recovered the value of the rebates supporting supplemental benefits.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: Nicholas LH, Wu S .
Do Medicare Advantage rebates reduce enrollees' out-of-pocket spending?
Med Care Res Rev 2020 Oct;77(5):474-82. doi: 10.1177/1077558718807847..
Keywords: Healthcare Costs, Medicare, Health Insurance
Roberts ET, Nimgaonkar A, Aarons J
New evidence of state variation in Medicaid payment policies for dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollees.
The authors developed the first longitudinal database of state Medicaid policies for paying the cost sharing in Medicare Part B for services provided to dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollees (duals), and an index summarizing the impact of these policies on payments for physician office services. Information from 2004-2018 was consolidated from online Medicaid policy documents, state laws, and policy data reported to them by state Medicaid programs. The database showed that in 2018 42 states had policies to limit Medicaid payments of Medicare cost sharing when Medicaid’s fee schedule was lower than Medicare’s. This was an increase from 36 such states in 2004. In most states, combined Medicare and Medicare payments for evaluation and management services provided to duals averaged 78% of the Medicare allowed amount for these services.
AHRQ-funded; HS026727.
Citation: Roberts ET, Nimgaonkar A, Aarons J .
New evidence of state variation in Medicaid payment policies for dual Medicare-Medicaid enrollees.
Health Serv Res 2020 Oct;55(5):701-09. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13545..
Keywords: Medicaid, Medicare, Payment, Policy, Healthcare Costs, Health Insurance
Encinosa WE
AHRQ Author: Encinosa WE
Is it time for ACOs to start tackling the high costs of surgery?
This article discusses an article appearing in the same issue revisiting the impact of Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) accountable care organizations (ACOs) on surgery expenditures. The author suggests that, in order to engage even more surgeons, it is likely that MSSP ACOs will have to work with surgeons in the various Medicare bundled payment programs for surgery. He concludes that the next stage is to examine how these different programs can work together to produce even more savings in surgical care.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Encinosa WE .
Is it time for ACOs to start tackling the high costs of surgery?
Am J Accountable Care 2020 Sep 15;8(3):26-27..
Keywords: Surgery, Healthcare Costs, Medicaid, Health Insurance, Payment
Modi PK, Moloci N, Herrel LA
Medicare accountable care organizations reduce spending on surgery.
This study examined the impact that Medicare accountable care organization (ACO) alignment has on spending for inpatient and outpatient surgical care. Researchers identified adults 65 years of age and older enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare from among a 20% random sample of beneficiaries and distinguished between those aligned and unaligned with a Medicare ACO, then measured payments for surgical services made on the enrollees’ behalf. Findings showed that ACO alignment was associated with savings on surgical care. These savings resulted from increased outpatient surgery and reduced use of inpatient surgery as well as reduced spending per inpatient surgical episode. Greater focus on surgical care to improve the ability of ACOs to control healthcare spending was recommended.
AHRQ-funded; HS024728; HS024525; HS026908.
Citation: Modi PK, Moloci N, Herrel LA .
Medicare accountable care organizations reduce spending on surgery.
Am J Accountable Care 2020 Sep;8(3):12-19..
Keywords: Medicare, Surgery, Healthcare Costs, Health Insurance, Elderly
Brown TT, Guo C, Whaley C
Reference-based benefits for colonoscopy and arthroscopy: large differences in patient payments across procedures but similar behavioral responses.
This study examined how reference-based benefits (RBB) affect out-of-pocket payments across outpatient procedures. The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) applied RBB only to outpatient procedures performed in a hospital outpatient department (HOPD) and not to outpatient procedures performed in a lower cost ambulatory surgery center. Claims from 2009-2013 on arthroscopy and colonoscopy services were analyzed. CalPERS patients paid an average of 63.9% more for HOPDs than ambulatory surgery centers in 2012, but for arthroscopy there was no statistically different cost sharing. This led to high-priced HOPDs being less likely to be chosen by CalPERS patients for both procedures.
AHRQ-funded; HS022098.
Citation: Brown TT, Guo C, Whaley C .
Reference-based benefits for colonoscopy and arthroscopy: large differences in patient payments across procedures but similar behavioral responses.
Med Care Res Rev 2020 Jun;77(3):261-73. doi: 10.1177/1077558718793325..
Keywords: Payment, Healthcare Costs, Health Insurance, Ambulatory Care and Surgery
Dekhne MS, Nuliyalu U, Schoenfeld AJ
"Surprise" out-of-network billing in orthopedic surgery: charges from surprising sources.
This study examined “surprise” out-of-network billing in orthopedic surgery. Data was analyzed from the Clinformatics DataMart on commercial insured patients undergoing 4 different elective orthopedic procedures from 2012 to 2017: arthroscopic meniscal repair, lumbar discectomy, total knee replacement and total hip replacement. They defined surprise bills as out-of-network bills for procedures done at in-network hospitals. The rate of potential surprise bills was 24.8% for total knee replacement, 24.5% lumbar discectomy, 23.5% for total hip replacement, and 12.5% for meniscal repair. The largest number of surprise bills came from anesthesiologists (39% of all episodes), and durable medical equipment (15%). Per episode, the largest bills came from nonphysician surgical assistants, neurologists, and physician assistants.
AHRQ-funded; HS000053; HS023597.
Citation: Dekhne MS, Nuliyalu U, Schoenfeld AJ .
"Surprise" out-of-network billing in orthopedic surgery: charges from surprising sources.
Ann Surg 2020 May;271(5):e116-e18. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003825..
Keywords: Orthopedics, Surgery, Payment, Healthcare Costs, Health Insurance
Cook BL, Flores M, Zuvekas SH
AHRQ Author: Zuvekas SH
The impact Of Medicare's mental health cost-sharing parity on use of mental health care services.
This study examined the impact of Medicare’s mental health cost-sharing parity on use of mental health care services, which was phased in from 2010 to 2014. The authors assessed whether the reduction in mental health cost sharing was associated with changes in specialty and primary care outpatient mental health visits and psychotropic medication fills. They compared people with Medicare and private insurance before and after implementation. Medicare beneficiaries’ use of psychotropic medication increased after implementation but there was not a detectable change in visits.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Cook BL, Flores M, Zuvekas SH .
The impact Of Medicare's mental health cost-sharing parity on use of mental health care services.
Health Aff 2020 May;39(5):819-27. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01008..
Keywords: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Medicare, Behavioral Health, Healthcare Costs, Policy, Health Insurance, Healthcare Utilization, Access to Care
Tseng CW, Masuda C, Chen R
Impact of higher insulin prices on out-of-pocket costs in Medicare Part D.
In this study, the investigators examined how patients’ out-of-pocket costs for insulin would have dropped from 2014 to 2019 due to Part D policy changes and whether higher insulin prices offset these potential savings. The authors concluded that efforts to reduce patients’
out-of-pocket cost by closing the Medicare Part D coverage gap were largely negated by higher insulin prices.
out-of-pocket cost by closing the Medicare Part D coverage gap were largely negated by higher insulin prices.
AHRQ-funded; HS024227.
Citation: Tseng CW, Masuda C, Chen R .
Impact of higher insulin prices on out-of-pocket costs in Medicare Part D.
Diabetes Care 2020 Apr;43(4):e50-e51. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1294..
Keywords: Medication, Healthcare Costs, Medicare, Health Insurance, Policy
Grafova IB, Monheit AC, Kumar R
How do changes in income, employment and health insurance affect family mental health spending?
This study used eight two-year panels from the MEPS data for 2004 to 2012 to examine the effect of economic shocks on mental health spending by families with children. Researchers wanted to determine whether the greatest impact on mental health spending comes from income, employment, or health insurance shocks. They used two-part expenditure models to estimate that employment losses are positively related to an increase in total family mental health expenditures. But no link was found between economic shocks and mental health spending on fathers.
AHRQ-funded; HS024053.
Citation: Grafova IB, Monheit AC, Kumar R .
How do changes in income, employment and health insurance affect family mental health spending?
Rev Econ Househ 2020 Mar;18(1:239-63. doi: 10.1007/s11150-018-9436-y.
.
.
Keywords: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Healthcare Costs, Behavioral Health, Social Determinants of Health, Health Insurance