National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- (-) Cancer (10)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Lung Cancer (1)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (2)
- Communication (1)
- Decision Making (2)
- Disparities (1)
- Elderly (1)
- Genetics (1)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (2)
- Medicare (1)
- (-) Patient-Centered Healthcare (10)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (3)
- Patient and Family Engagement (2)
- Patient Experience (2)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Provider (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Quality of Life (1)
- Research Methodologies (2)
- Teams (2)
- Treatments (1)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 10 of 10 Research Studies DisplayedReimer T, Lee SJC, Garcia S
Cancer center clinic and research team perceptions of identity and interactions.
The purpose of this study was to determine perceptions of roles of cancer center clinic and research teams. The researchers developed and administered survey to research and clinic staff at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. Although there are many similarities between clinic and research teams, the researchers also identified key differences, including perceptions of goal clarity and sharing, understanding and alignment with cancer center goals, and importance of outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Reimer T, Lee SJC, Garcia S .
Cancer center clinic and research team perceptions of identity and interactions.
J Oncol Pract 2017 Dec;13(12):e1021-e29. doi: 10.1200/jop.2017.024349..
Keywords: Cancer, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies
Tamirisa NP, Goodwin JS, Kandalam A
Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.
The aim of the study was to explore patient and physician perceptions of shared decision making in clinical encounters for cancer care. Among the study’s multiple conclusions was that most physicians reported providing patients with written information, however, most patients reported that written information was too detailed and felt that the physicians did not assess the level of information they wished to receive.
AHRQ-funded; HS022134.
Citation: Tamirisa NP, Goodwin JS, Kandalam A .
Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.
Health Expect 2017 Dec;20(6):1248-53. doi: 10.1111/hex.12564..
Keywords: Cancer, Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient Experience, Clinician-Patient Communication
Kelly G, Wang SY, Lucas G
Facilitating meaningful engagement on community advisory committees in patient-centered outcome research.
In this study, the investigators conducted a process evaluation of ongoing activities of a Patient Advisory Committee (PAC) formed around the development of an individualized decision aid for older women with early stage breast cancer. They indicated that their results suggested that engaging committee members in a process of evaluation and collective reflection during a research collaboration can break down barriers to collaboration, build relationships, create opportunities for co-learning and strengthen researchers' capacity to engage meaningfully with stakeholders.
AHRQ-funded; HS023900.
Citation: Kelly G, Wang SY, Lucas G .
Facilitating meaningful engagement on community advisory committees in patient-centered outcome research.
Prog Community Health Partnersh 2017;11(3):243-51. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0029..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies
Fisher KA, Mazor KM
Patient and family complaints in cancer care: what can we learn from the tip of the iceberg?
This paper comments on the Mack et al. article “Evaluation of Patient and Family Outpatient Complaints as a Strategy to Prioritize Efforts to Improve Cancer Care Delivery”, published in 2017 in The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, in which Mack et al. categorized all complaints filed at a large outpatient cancer center during a two-year period, put forth a preliminary rating system for assessing complaint severity, and catalogued the actions taken in response to the complaints.
AHRQ-funded; HS024596; HS022757.
Citation: Fisher KA, Mazor KM .
Patient and family complaints in cancer care: what can we learn from the tip of the iceberg?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2017 Oct;43(10):495-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.07.003..
Keywords: Cancer, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient Experience, Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Rhoten BA
Conceptual issues surrounding body image for oncology nurses.
This paper discusses conceptual issues surrounding cancer survivors’ body image. It targets oncology nurses so they may have a better understanding of the historic overview of body image conceptualization, as well as a more contemporary, cancer-specific approach to understanding how this population of patients may be particularly affected.
AHRQ-funded; HS022990.
Citation: Rhoten BA .
Conceptual issues surrounding body image for oncology nurses.
Oncol Nurs Forum 2017 Sep 1;44(5):534-36. doi: 10.1188/17.onf.534-536..
Keywords: Cancer, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Provider, Quality of Life
Rocque GB, Pisu M, Jackson BE
Resource use and Medicare costs during lay navigation for geriatric patients with cancer.
This study examined the influence of lay navigation on health care spending and resource use among geriatric patients with cancer within The University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System Cancer Community Network. It found that, compared with a matched comparison group, the mean total costs declined by $781.29 more per quarter per navigated patient, for an estimated $19 million decline per year across the network.
AHRQ-funded; HS023009.
Citation: Rocque GB, Pisu M, Jackson BE .
Resource use and Medicare costs during lay navigation for geriatric patients with cancer.
JAMA Oncol 2017 Jun;3(6):817-25. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6307.
.
.
Keywords: Elderly, Cancer, Healthcare Costs, Medicare, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Healthcare Delivery
Lee SJ, Clark MA, Cox JV
Achieving coordinated care for patients with complex cases of cancer: a multiteam system approach.
The authors outlined challenges of care coordination in the context of a multiteam system (MTS), through the care experience of a patient in the Dallas County integrated safety-net system. A cancer diagnosis triggered an additional need for augmented coordination between his different provider teams. The authors recommend that further research and practice investigate the relationships of MTS coordination for shared care management, transfer to and from specialty care, treatment compliance, barriers to care, and health outcomes of chronic comorbid conditions, as well as cancer control and surveillance.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Lee SJ, Clark MA, Cox JV .
Achieving coordinated care for patients with complex cases of cancer: a multiteam system approach.
J Oncol Pract 2016 Nov;12(11):1029-38. doi: 10.1200/jop.2016.013664.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Care Coordination, Chronic Conditions, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Teams
Gerber DE, Reimer T, Williams EL
Resolving rivalries and realigning goals: challenges of clinical and research multiteam systems.
This article describes the care processes for a 64-year-old man with newly diagnosed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who was enrolled in a first-line clinical trial of a new immunotherapy regimen. Research team and clinical team members have limited knowledge of the roles and work of individuals outside their team. Recommendations to increase trust and collaboration are provided.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Gerber DE, Reimer T, Williams EL .
Resolving rivalries and realigning goals: challenges of clinical and research multiteam systems.
J Oncol Pract 2016 Nov;12(11):1020-28. doi: 10.1200/jop.2016.013060.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Case Study, Healthcare Delivery, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Teams
Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
The researchers identified patient-centered communication strategies/gaps for discussing Oncotype DX testing (ODX) results. They applied a patient-centered communication framework to analyze qualitative interviews with oncologists about how they communicate about ODX with patients. Overall, providers discussed four patient-centered communication domains: exchanging information, assessing uncertainty, making decisions and cross-cutting themes.
AHRQ-funded; HS019468; HS022189.
Citation: Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M .
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
Cancer Invest 2016 May 27;34(5):205-12. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2016.1172637.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Communication, Clinician-Patient Communication, Decision Making, Genetics, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Women
Ellis CT, Samuel CA, Stitzenberg KB
National trends in nonoperative management of rectal adenocarcinoma.
The researchers examined the use of non-operative management (NOM) for rectal cancer over time and the patient- and facility-level factors associated with its use. They found evidence of increasing NOM use, with this increase occurring more frequently in black and uninsured/Medicaid patients, raising concern that increased NOM use may actually represent increasing disparities in rectal cancer care rather than innovation. They recommended further studies to assess survival differences by treatment strategy.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032.
Citation: Ellis CT, Samuel CA, Stitzenberg KB .
National trends in nonoperative management of rectal adenocarcinoma.
J Clin Oncol 2016 May 10;34(14):1644-51. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.2066.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Disparities, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Treatments