National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Arthritis (1)
- Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics (CERTs) (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Decision Making (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- (-) Orthopedics (5)
- Outcomes (2)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (5)
- Surgery (4)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedKo H, Pelt CE, Martin BI
Patient-reported outcomes following cemented versus cementless primary total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching.
The purpose of this study was to compare baseline and early post-operative global and condition-specific patient reported outcomes (PROs) between patients undergoing cemented versus cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The researchers prospectively collected PROs through the Comparative Effectiveness Pulmonary Embolism Prevention After Hip and Knee Replacement (PEPPER) trial using the short-form of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-Jr.), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health (PROMIS-PH), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Pre- and post-operative outcomes in 5,961 patients undergoing primary TKA between December 2016 and August 2021 were examined. The study found that significant pre to- post-operative were observed in both groups. The researchers concluded that patients with cemented TKA reported early benefit in KOOS-Jr. over those with cementless TKA.
AHRQ-funded; HS024714.
Citation: Ko H, Pelt CE, Martin BI .
Patient-reported outcomes following cemented versus cementless primary total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022 Oct 27;23(1):934. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05899-1..
Keywords: Orthopedics, Surgery, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Graber J, Kittelson A, Juarez-Colunga E
Comparing "people-like-me" and linear mixed model predictions of functional recovery following knee arthroplasty.
This study compared the relative strengths and weaknesses of 2 prediction model approaches for predicting functional recovery after knee arthroplasty: a neighbors-based "people-like-me" (PLM) approach and a linear mixed model (LMM) approach. The authors used 2 distinct datasets to train and then test PLM and LMM prediction approaches. They used the Timed Up and Go (TUG)-a common test of mobility-to operationalize physical function. Both approaches use patient characteristics and baseline postoperative TUG values to predict TUG recovery from days 1-425 following surgery. They then compared the accuracy and precision of the two approaches. A total of 317 patient records with 1379 TUG observations were used to train approaches, and 456 patient records with 1244 TUG observations were used to test the predictions. Both approaches performed similarly in terms of mean squared error and bias, but the PLM approach provided more accurate and precise estimates of prediction uncertainty.
AHRQ-funded; HS025692.
Citation: Graber J, Kittelson A, Juarez-Colunga E .
Comparing "people-like-me" and linear mixed model predictions of functional recovery following knee arthroplasty.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1899-907. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac123..
Keywords: Orthopedics, Surgery, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes
Lin E, Uhler LM, Finley EP
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into shared decision-making in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol.
This article describes a US-based 2-year, two-site hybrid type 1 study to assess clinical effectiveness and implementation of a machine learning-based patient decision aid integrating patient-reported outcomes and clinical variables to support shared decision-making for patients with knee osteoarthritis considering total knee replacement. Study results will be disseminated through conference presentations, publications and professional societies.
AHRQ-funded; HS027037.
Citation: Lin E, Uhler LM, Finley EP .
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into shared decision-making in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol.
BMJ Open 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e055933. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055933..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Arthritis, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Orthopedics, Health Information Technology (HIT), Evidence-Based Practice
Chrenka EA, Solberg LI, Asche SE
Is shared decision-making associated with better patient-reported outcomes? A longitudinal study of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.
This study examined whether shared decision making (SDM) provides better outcomes using patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty as a test case. This observational longitudinal survey-based study surveyed patients receiving an initial THA or TKA from a large, multispecialty medical group in the Midwestern United States after they were scheduled for surgery and again at 12 months after their procedure. The majority of included patients were white (1255 of 1344) with only 3% using Medicaid benefits at the time of surgery. The three-item collaboRATE measure of SDM was added to existing patient surveys of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Patient responses were analyzed in regression models to estimate the association between preoperative collaborate scores and Oxford knee or hip scores at 12 months postoperatively. There was a moderate, positive association between preoperative collaborate scores and the Oxford scores at 12 months. The association suggests that SDM could be one tool to encourage better outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS025618.
Citation: Chrenka EA, Solberg LI, Asche SE .
Is shared decision-making associated with better patient-reported outcomes? A longitudinal study of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022 Jan;480(1):82-91. doi: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001920..
Keywords: Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Orthopedics, Surgery
Singh JA, Lewallen DG
Are outcomes after total knee arthroplasty worsening over time? A time-trends study of activity limitation and pain outcomes.
The authors examined whether function and pain outcomes of patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are changing over time. Using Mayo Clinic Total Joint Registry data, they found that patient-reported function and pain outcomes after primary TKA have worsened over the study period 1993-95 to 2002-05; this time-trend is independent of changes in preoperative pain/limitation and certain patient characteristics.
AHRQ-funded; HS021110.
Citation: Singh JA, Lewallen DG .
Are outcomes after total knee arthroplasty worsening over time? A time-trends study of activity limitation and pain outcomes.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014 Dec 17;15:440. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-440.
.
.
Keywords: Centers for Education and Research on Therapeutics (CERTs), Orthopedics, Pain, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Surgery