National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Arthritis (2)
- Cancer (3)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (3)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (8)
- (-) Communication (10)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Elderly (1)
- Genetics (1)
- Guidelines (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Health Literacy (2)
- Imaging (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (4)
- Patient and Family Engagement (7)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (10)
- Transplantation (1)
- Women (3)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 10 of 10 Research Studies DisplayedRosenberg SM, Gierisch JM, Revette AC
"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
This study investigated the impact of a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosis by engaging self-identified patients regarding their experience. Findings showed that, in a large, national sample, participants with a history of DCIS reported confusion and concern about the diagnosis and treatment, which caused worry and significant uncertainty.
AHRQ-funded; HS023680.
Citation: Rosenberg SM, Gierisch JM, Revette AC .
"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Cancer 2022 Apr 15;128(8):1676-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34126..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Women, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Communication
Dossett LA, Mott NM, Bredbeck BC
Using tailored messages to target overuse of Low-Value breast cancer care in older women.
The purpose of this study was to examine the role that an individual’s maximizing-minimizing trait, an inherent preference for more or less medical care, may influence the preference for low-value care in the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy in women 70 years of age or higher with early-stage, hormone-receptor positive invasive breast cancer. The researchers recruited women 70 years of age or higher (n=1600) who were maximizers (515), minimizers (550), or neutral (535), and presented them with a hypothetical breast cancer diagnosis and then randomized exposure to one of three follow-up messages. Messages included: 1) maximizer-tailored, 2) minimizer-tailored, or 3) neutral. The study reported that higher maximizing tendency correlated positively with electing both SLNB and radiotherapy on logistic regression. Any maximizer- or minimizer-tailoring decreased preference for SLNB in maximizing and neutral women but had no effect in minimizing women. Tailoring had no impact on radiotherapy decision, except for an increased probability of minimizers electing radiotherapy when presented with maximizer-tailored messaging. The study concluded that among women facing a hypothetical breast cancer diagnosis, tendencies for maximizing-minimizing are correlated with preferences for treatment.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Dossett LA, Mott NM, Bredbeck BC .
Using tailored messages to target overuse of Low-Value breast cancer care in older women.
J Surg Res 2022 Feb;270:503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.10.005..
Keywords: Elderly, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Women, Shared Decision Making, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication
Gordon HS, Street RL
How physicians, patients, and observers compare on the use of qualitative and quantitative measures of physician-patient communication.
The purpose of this study was to compare several different measures of physician-patient communication. Communication was measured with rating scales completed by patients and physicians and by two groups of external observers who used rating scales or coded the frequency of communication behaviors. The findings highlight the potential for using observers' ratings as an alternate measure of communication to more labor intensive frequency measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS010876.
Citation: Gordon HS, Street RL .
How physicians, patients, and observers compare on the use of qualitative and quantitative measures of physician-patient communication.
Eval Health Prof 2016 Dec;39(4):496-511. doi: 10.1177/0163278715625737.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Gulbrandsen P, Clayman ML, Beach MC
Shared decision-making as an existential journey: aiming for restored autonomous capacity.
The researchers described the different ways in which illness represents an existential problem, and its implications for shared decision-making. They found that the fundamental uncertainty, state of vulnerability, and lack of power of the ill patient, imbue shared decision-making with a deeper existential significance and call for greater attention to the emotional and relational dimensions of care. They propose that the aim of shared decision-making should be restoration of the patient's autonomous capacity.
AHRQ-funded; HS022932.
Citation: Gulbrandsen P, Clayman ML, Beach MC .
Shared decision-making as an existential journey: aiming for restored autonomous capacity.
Patient Educ Couns 2016 Sep;99(9):1505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.014.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
The researchers identified patient-centered communication strategies/gaps for discussing Oncotype DX testing (ODX) results. They applied a patient-centered communication framework to analyze qualitative interviews with oncologists about how they communicate about ODX with patients. Overall, providers discussed four patient-centered communication domains: exchanging information, assessing uncertainty, making decisions and cross-cutting themes.
AHRQ-funded; HS019468; HS022189.
Citation: Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M .
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
Cancer Invest 2016 May 27;34(5):205-12. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2016.1172637.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Communication, Clinician-Patient Communication, Shared Decision Making, Genetics, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Women
Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW
The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making.
The authors discuss a range of issues associated with shared decision making. They see it as a collaborative communication process between clinicians and patients that integrates the best evidence available with the patients’ values and preferences, to promote high-quality health care decisions.
AHRQ-funded; HS023000.
Citation: Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW .
The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making.
JAMA 2016 May 17;315(19):2063-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3070..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Traino HM, Nonterah CW, Gupta G
Living kidney donors' information needs and preferences.
The purpose of this study was to assess donors' perceptions of the information provided while considering living donation. The study revealed limited usefulness of certain CMS-mandated topics and a desire for additional information about donation. Efforts to standardize the informed consent process should incorporate donors' perspectives as to the specific topics, quantity of information, and the mode of communication found most useful when considering living donation.
AHRQ-funded; HS018113; HS021312.
Citation: Traino HM, Nonterah CW, Gupta G .
Living kidney donors' information needs and preferences.
Prog Transplant 2016 Mar;26(1):47-54. doi: 10.1177/1526924816633943.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Transplantation
Lacson R, Prevedello LM, Andriole KP
Four-year impact of an alert notification system on closed-loop communication of critical test results.
The authors evaluated the impact of an alert notification system on policy adherence for communicating critical imaging test results to referring providers and assessed system adoption over the first 4 years after implementation. They concluded that an automated alert notification system for communicating critical imaging results was successfully adopted and was associated with increased adherence to institutional policy for communicating critical test results and with reduced workflow interruptions.
AHRQ-funded; HS019635.
Citation: Lacson R, Prevedello LM, Andriole KP .
Four-year impact of an alert notification system on closed-loop communication of critical test results.
AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014 Nov;203(5):933-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.14.13064.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Guidelines, Health Information Technology (HIT), Imaging
Barton JL, Trupin L, Tonner C
English language proficiency, health literacy, and trust in physician are associated with shared decision making in rheumatoid arthritis.
The objective of this study was to examine patterns of perceived communication around decision making in 2 cohorts of adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The investigators found that nearly one-third of subjects reported suboptimal shared decision making communication (SDM) with their clinicians, regardless of cohort. Lower trust in physician was independently associated with suboptimal SDM communication in both cohorts.
AHRQ-funded; HS019209.
Citation: Barton JL, Trupin L, Tonner C .
English language proficiency, health literacy, and trust in physician are associated with shared decision making in rheumatoid arthritis.
J Rheumatol 2014 Jul;41(7):1290-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131350..
Keywords: Arthritis, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Health Literacy, Patient and Family Engagement
Barton JL, Trupin L, Tonner C
English language proficiency, health literacy, and trust in physician are associated with shared decision making in rheumatoid arthritis.
The objective of this study was to examine patterns of perceived communication around decision making in 2 cohorts of adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The investigators found that nearly one-third of subjects reported suboptimal shared decision making communication (SDM) with their clinicians, regardless of cohort. Lower trust in physician was independently associated with suboptimal SDM communication in both cohorts.
AHRQ-funded; HS019209.
Citation: Barton JL, Trupin L, Tonner C .
English language proficiency, health literacy, and trust in physician are associated with shared decision making in rheumatoid arthritis.
J Rheumatol 2014 Jul;41(7):1290-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131350..
Keywords: Arthritis, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Health Literacy, Patient and Family Engagement