National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (1)
- Adverse Events (2)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- (-) Medical Errors (2)
- Medication (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Patient Safety (1)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedSchoenfeld EM, Mader S, Houghton C
The effect of shared decisionmaking on patients' likelihood of filing a complaint or lawsuit: a simulation study.
This study examined the effect of shared decisionmaking on the likelihood of a patient filing a complaint or lawsuit after an adverse event. A simulation experiment using clinical vignettes was conducted. The participants, adults from the US were recruited from an online crowd-sourcing platform. They were randomized to vignettes with 1-3 levels of shared decision making. A total of 804 participants were recruited. Those who were exposed to shared decisionmaking were 80% less like to report a plan to contact a lawyer than those not exposed. They also showed higher levels of physician trust, and less likely to fault their physicians for an adverse outcome.
AHRQ-funded; HS024311.
Citation: Schoenfeld EM, Mader S, Houghton C .
The effect of shared decisionmaking on patients' likelihood of filing a complaint or lawsuit: a simulation study.
Ann Emerg Med 2019 Jul;74(1):126-36. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.11.017..
Keywords: Adverse Events, Shared Decision Making, Medical Errors, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement
Horsky J, Aarts J, Verheul L
Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing.
The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze reasoning patterns of clinicians responding to drug-drug interaction alerts in order to understand the role of patient-specific information in the decision-making process about the risks and benefits of medication therapy. The investigators found that declining an alert suggestion was preceded by sometimes brief but often complex reasoning, prioritizing different aspects of care quality and safety, especially when the perceived risk was higher.
AHRQ-funded; HS021094.
Citation: Horsky J, Aarts J, Verheul L .
Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing.
Int J Med Inform 2017 Jan;97:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.004..
Keywords: Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Medication, Patient Safety