National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (1)
- Antibiotics (1)
- Cancer (1)
- (-) Comparative Effectiveness (5)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Injuries and Wounds (2)
- Medicare (1)
- Medication (1)
- Mortality (1)
- (-) Outcomes (5)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (3)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Prevention (1)
- (-) Surgery (5)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedBorah BJ, Yao X, Laughlin-Tommaso SK
Comparative effectiveness of uterine leiomyoma procedures using a large insurance claims database.
The objective of this retrospective analysis of administrative claims from a large U.S. commercial insurance database, was to compare risk of reintervention, long-term clinical outcomes, and health care utilization among women who have bulk symptoms from leiomyoma and who underwent the following procedures: hysterectomy, myomectomy, uterine artery embolization, and magnetic resonance-guided, focused ultrasound surgery.
AHRQ-funded; HS023418.
Citation: Borah BJ, Yao X, Laughlin-Tommaso SK .
Comparative effectiveness of uterine leiomyoma procedures using a large insurance claims database.
Obstet Gynecol 2017 Nov;130(5):1047-56. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002331..
Keywords: Cancer, Comparative Effectiveness, Health Insurance, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Surgery, Women
O'Toole RV, Gary JL, Reider L
A prospective randomized trial to assess fixation strategies for severe open tibia fractures: modern ring external fixators versus internal fixation (FIXIT study).
The FIXIT study is a prospective, multicenter randomized trial comparing 1-year outcomes after treatment of severe open tibial shaft fractures with modern external ring fixation versus internal fixation among men and women of ages 18-64. The primary outcome is rehospitalization for major limb complications. One-year treatment costs and patient satisfaction will be compared between the 2 groups.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: O'Toole RV, Gary JL, Reider L .
A prospective randomized trial to assess fixation strategies for severe open tibia fractures: modern ring external fixators versus internal fixation (FIXIT study).
J Orthop Trauma 2017 Apr;31 Suppl 1:S10-s17. doi: 10.1097/bot.0000000000000804.
.
.
Keywords: Injuries and Wounds, Surgery, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Comparative Effectiveness, Outcomes, Evidence-Based Practice
Obremskey WT, Schmidt AH, O'Toole RV
A prospective randomized trial to assess oral versus intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative wound infection after extremity fractures (POvIV study).
The POvIV study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to compare oral (PO) with intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy in patients with postoperative wound infections after extremity fractures. This study will be the largest prospective randomized trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of PO antibiotic use for treatment of postoperative wound infections. Results will inform clinician decisions on antibiotic delivery in patients with postoperative wound infections.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: Obremskey WT, Schmidt AH, O'Toole RV .
A prospective randomized trial to assess oral versus intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative wound infection after extremity fractures (POvIV study).
J Orthop Trauma 2017 Apr;31 Suppl 1:S32-s38. doi: 10.1097/bot.0000000000000802.
.
.
Keywords: Antibiotics, Surgery, Injuries and Wounds, Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Comparative Effectiveness, Medication, Patient Safety, Adverse Events, Prevention, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes
Martin BI, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN
Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.
The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) provided a unique opportunity to examine the validity of a claims-based algorithm for grouping patients by surgical indication. SPORT enrolled patients for lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. The researchers found that their claims-based hierarchical coding algorithm of spine-related medical encounters correctly classified more than 90 percent of Medicare patients into their respective SPORT cohorts.
AHRQ-funded; HS018405
Citation: Martin BI, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN .
Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.
Spine. 2014 Apr 20;39(9):769-79. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000275..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Surgery, Outcomes, Medicare
Jones WS, Dolor RJ, Hasselblad V
Comparative effectiveness of endovascular and surgical revascularization for patients with peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischemia: systematic review of revascularization in critical limb ischemia.
This systematic review found that there is no difference in clinical outcomes for patients with critical limb ischemia treated with endovascular or surgical revascularization. This review of 23 studies found no differences in overall death, amputation, or amputation-free survival at 2 or more years following treatment.
AHRQ-funded; 290200710066I
Citation: Jones WS, Dolor RJ, Hasselblad V .
Comparative effectiveness of endovascular and surgical revascularization for patients with peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischemia: systematic review of revascularization in critical limb ischemia.
Am Heart J. 2014 Apr;167(4):489-498.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.012..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Outcomes, Surgery, Mortality