National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (1)
- Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) (1)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (1)
- Elderly (1)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (2)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Hospitals (3)
- Injuries and Wounds (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- (-) Patient Safety (7)
- (-) Provider Performance (7)
- Quality Improvement (3)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (2)
- Quality Measures (3)
- Quality of Care (4)
- Surgery (2)
- Teams (1)
- Training (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 7 of 7 Research Studies DisplayedCatchpole K, Neyens DM, Abernathy J
Framework for direct observation of performance and safety in healthcare.
This viewpoint paper discusses non-participant direct observation of healthcare processes as a rich method for understanding safety and performance improvement. The authors suggest that as a prospective method for error prediction and modelling, observation can capture a broad range of performance issues that can be related to higher aspects of the system.
AHRQ-funded; HS024380.
Citation: Catchpole K, Neyens DM, Abernathy J .
Framework for direct observation of performance and safety in healthcare.
BMJ Qual Saf 2017 Dec;26(12):1015-21. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006407..
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Patient Safety, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement
Smith SN, Reichert HA, Ameling JM
Dissecting Leapfrog: how well do Leapfrog safe practices scores correlate with Hospital Compare ratings and penalties, and how much do they matter?
Voluntary Leapfrog Safe Practices Score (SPS) measures were among the first public reports of hospital performance. Recently, Medicare's Hospital Compare website has reported compulsory measures. Leapfrog's Hospital Safety Score (HSS) grades incorporate SPS and Medicare measures. The researchers evaluated associations between Leapfrog SPS and Medicare measures. They found that voluntary Leapfrog SPS measures skew toward positive self-report and bear little association with compulsory Medicare outcomes and penalties.
AHRQ-funded; HS019767; HS024385; HS018334.
Citation: Smith SN, Reichert HA, Ameling JM .
Dissecting Leapfrog: how well do Leapfrog safe practices scores correlate with Hospital Compare ratings and penalties, and how much do they matter?
Med Care 2017 Jun;55(6):606-14. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000716.
.
.
Keywords: Patient Safety, Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI), Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Hospitals, Provider Performance
DeLancey JO, Softcheck J, Chung JW
Associations between hospital characteristics, measure reporting, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings.
This study evaluated associations between hospital characteristics, number and types of measures reported, and the star ratings. Of 3,591 hospitals receiving a star rating,4 or 5 stars were awarded to 15.8 percent of major teaching hospitals, 18.8 percent of other teaching hospitals, 30.2 percent of community hospitals, 33.3 percent of critical access hospitals, and 87.3 percent of specialty hospitals.
AHRQ-funded; HS021857.
Citation: DeLancey JO, Softcheck J, Chung JW .
Associations between hospital characteristics, measure reporting, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings.
JAMA 2017 May 16;317(19):2015-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3148.
.
.
Keywords: Hospitals, Quality of Care, Quality Measures, Provider Performance, Patient Safety
Fernandez R, Shah S, Rosenman ED
Developing team cognition: a role for simulation.
Evidence from team science research demonstrates a strong relationship between team cognition and team performance and suggests a role for simulation in the development of this team-level construct. In this article, the researchers synthesize research from the broader team science literature to provide foundational knowledge regarding team cognition and highlight best practices for using simulation to target team cognition.
AHRQ-funded; HS020295; HS022458.
Citation: Fernandez R, Shah S, Rosenman ED .
Developing team cognition: a role for simulation.
Simul Healthc 2017 Apr;12(2):96-103. doi: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000200.
.
.
Keywords: Teams, Training, Provider Performance, Patient Safety
Calderwood MS, Kleinman K, Huang SS
Surgical site infections: volume-outcome relationship and year-to-year stability of performance rankings.
The researchers evaluated the volume-outcome relationship as well as the year-to-year stability of performance rankings following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and hip arthroplasty. They concluded that aggregate surgical site infection risk is highest in hospitals with low annual procedure volumes. Even for higher volume hospitals, year-to-year random variation makes past experience an unreliable estimator of current performance.
AHRQ-funded; HS021424.
Citation: Calderwood MS, Kleinman K, Huang SS .
Surgical site infections: volume-outcome relationship and year-to-year stability of performance rankings.
Med Care 2017 Jan;55(1):79-85. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000620.
.
.
Keywords: Surgery, Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Adverse Events, Injuries and Wounds, Hospitals, Provider Performance, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Elderly
Maggard-Gibbons M
The use of report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
This review summarized the history of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project and its components, and described the evidence that feeding outcomes back to providers, along with real-time comparisons with other hospital rates, leads to quality improvement, better patient outcomes, cost savings and overall improved patient safety.
AHRQ-funded; 2902007100621.
Citation: Maggard-Gibbons M .
The use of report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
BMJ Qual Saf 2014 Jul;23(7):589-99. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002223..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Surgery, Patient Safety, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Provider Performance
Arora VM, Berhie S, Horwitz LI
Using standardized videos to validate a measure of handoff quality: the handoff mini-clinical examination exercise.
The researchers report the results of the development of a shorter Handoff Mini-Clinical Examination Exercise (CEX), along with the formal establishment of its construct validity, namely its ability to distinguish between levels of performance in 3 domains of handoff quality. They were able to demonstrate evidence that the Handoff Mini-CEX can draw reliable and valid conclusions regarding handoff performance by physicians in U.S. hospitals.
AHRQ-funded; HS018278
Citation: Arora VM, Berhie S, Horwitz LI .
Using standardized videos to validate a measure of handoff quality: the handoff mini-clinical examination exercise.
J Hospital Med. 2014 Jul;9(7):441-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2185.
.
.
Keywords: Provider Performance, Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Education: Continuing Medical Education, Patient Safety