National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedMartino SC, Shaller D, Schlesinger M
CAHPS and comments: how closed-ended survey questions and narrative accounts interact in the assessment of patient experience.
The authors investigated whether content from patient narratives explains variation in patients' primary care provider (PCP) ratings beyond information from the closed-ended questions of CAHPS Clinician and Group Survey and whether the relative placement of closed- and open-ended survey questions affects either the content of narratives or the CAHPS composite scores. They found that incorporating a protocol for eliciting narratives into a patient experience survey resulted in minimal distortion of patient feedback, and narratives from sicker patients helped explain variation in provider ratings.
AHRQ-funded; HS016980; HS016978; HS021858.
Citation: Martino SC, Shaller D, Schlesinger M .
CAHPS and comments: how closed-ended survey questions and narrative accounts interact in the assessment of patient experience.
J Patient Exp 2017 Mar;4(1):37-45. doi: 10.1177/2374373516685940.
.
.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Measures
Schlesinger M, Kanouse DE, Martino SC
Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.
The authors identified four pathways through which complexity may impair consumer choice. They examined these pathways using data from an experiment in which consumers hypothetically selected a primary care physician. They found that some of the loss of decision quality accompanying more complex choice sets can be explained by consumers' skills and decision-making style, but even after accounting for these factors, complexity undermines the quality of decision making in ways that cannot be fully explained. They concluded by discussing implications for report designers, sponsors, and policy makers aspiring to promote consumer empowerment and health care quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978; HS016980.
Citation: Schlesinger M, Kanouse DE, Martino SC .
Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.
Med Care Res Rev 2014 Oct;71(5 Suppl):38s-64s. doi: 10.1177/1077558713496321.
.
.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Shared Decision Making, Quality of Care, Primary Care, Public Reporting