National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (1)
- Adverse Events (1)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- (-) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (10)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (5)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Falls (1)
- Genetics (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (5)
- Hospitals (2)
- Injuries and Wounds (1)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Medical Errors (1)
- Medication (1)
- Patient Safety (5)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Pressure Ulcers (1)
- Prevention (2)
- Primary Care (2)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Nurse (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Risk (1)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (10)
- Tools & Toolkits (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 10 of 10 Research Studies DisplayedWang J, Gong Y
Potential of decision support in preventing pressure ulcers in hospitals.
The development of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers signals low quality of care. To meet the challenges of consistently translating best practices into effective clinical practices and promote effective teamwork communication and interprofessional collaboration, the authors consider the failure of consistent care delivery as loss of information and reveal the opportunities of informatics methods to reinforce information delivery, evidenced by typical cases. They then explain and summarize information-related issues existing at the initial assessment upon hospital admission, routine treatments, and team communication.
AHRQ-funded; HS022895.
Citation: Wang J, Gong Y .
Potential of decision support in preventing pressure ulcers in hospitals.
Stud Health Technol Inform 2017;241:15-20.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Hospitals, Patient Safety, Pressure Ulcers, Prevention
Dykes PC, Duckworth M, Cunningham S
Pilot testing Fall TIPS (Tailoring Interventions for Patient Safety): a patient-centered fall prevention toolkit.
Patient falls during an acute hospitalization cause injury, reduced mobility, and increased costs. The laminated paper Fall TIPS Toolkit (Fall TIPS) provides clinical decision support at the bedside by linking each patient's fall risk assessment with evidence-based interventions. The investigators examined strategies to integrate this evidence into clinical practice. They concluded that engaging hospital and clinical leadership is critical in translating evidence-based care into clinical practice. They address and detail barriers to adoption of the protocol to provide guidance for spread to other institutions.
AHRQ-funded; HS025128.
Citation: Dykes PC, Duckworth M, Cunningham S .
Pilot testing Fall TIPS (Tailoring Interventions for Patient Safety): a patient-centered fall prevention toolkit.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2017 Aug;43(8):403-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.05.002..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Falls, Hospitals, Injuries and Wounds, Inpatient Care, Patient Safety, Prevention, Risk, Tools & Toolkits
Ancker JS, Edwards A, Nosal S
Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system.
In this study, the investigators tested hypotheses arising from two possible alert fatigue mechanisms: (A) cognitive overload associated with amount of work, complexity of work, and effort distinguishing informative from uninformative alerts, and (B) desensitization from repeated exposure to the same alert over time. The investigators found that clinicians became less likely to accept alerts as they received more of them, particularly more repeated alerts. There was no evidence of an effect of workload per se, or of desensitization over time for a newly deployed alert.
AHRQ-funded; HS021531.
Citation: Ancker JS, Edwards A, Nosal S .
Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017 Apr 10;17(1):1-9. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0430-8..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Safety, Provider, Provider: Nurse, Provider: Physician
Horsky J, Aarts J, Verheul L
Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing.
The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze reasoning patterns of clinicians responding to drug-drug interaction alerts in order to understand the role of patient-specific information in the decision-making process about the risks and benefits of medication therapy. The investigators found that declining an alert suggestion was preceded by sometimes brief but often complex reasoning, prioritizing different aspects of care quality and safety, especially when the perceived risk was higher.
AHRQ-funded; HS021094.
Citation: Horsky J, Aarts J, Verheul L .
Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing.
Int J Med Inform 2017 Jan;97:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.004..
Keywords: Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Medication, Patient Safety
McCullagh LJ, Sofianou A, Kannry J
User centered clinical decision support tools: adoption across clinician training level.
This study examined the differences in adoption of CDS tools across providers’ training level. It found that the completion rates of the CDS calculator and medication order sets were higher among first year residents compared to all other training levels. Attending physicians were the less likely to accept the initial step of the CDS tool (29.3 percent) or complete the medication order sets (22.4 percent) that guided their prescription decisions.
AHRQ-funded; HS018491.
Citation: McCullagh LJ, Sofianou A, Kannry J .
User centered clinical decision support tools: adoption across clinician training level.
Appl Clin Inform 2014 Dec 17;5(4):1015-25. doi: 10.4338/aci-2014-05-ra-0048.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Practice Patterns
Einbinder J, Hebel E, Wright A
The number needed to remind: a measure for assessing CDS effectiveness.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a better understanding of population based clinical decision support (CDS) performance measurement, to identify best practices for designing and implementing CDS, and to introduce two new quality measures, titled Reminder Performance (RP) and the Number Needed to Remind (NNR) for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical reminders in the context of the CDS Dashboards.
AHRQ-funded; 290200810010.
Citation: Einbinder J, Hebel E, Wright A .
The number needed to remind: a measure for assessing CDS effectiveness.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2014 Nov 14;2014:506-15..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Quality Measures, Quality of Care
Welch BM, Eilbeck K, Del Fiol G
Technical desiderata for the integration of genomic data with clinical decision support.
The objective of this study is to develop and validate a guiding set of technical desiderata for supporting the clinical use of the whole genome sequence (WGS) through clinical decision support (CDS). A panel of domain experts in genomics and CDS developed a proposed set of seven additional requirements. These additional desiderata provide important guiding principles for the technical development of CDS capabilities for the clinical use of WGS information.
AHRQ-funded; HS018352.
Citation: Welch BM, Eilbeck K, Del Fiol G .
Technical desiderata for the integration of genomic data with clinical decision support.
J Biomed Inform 2014 Oct;51:3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.014..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Genetics, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Shared Decision Making
Islam R, Weir C, Del Fiol G
Heuristics in managing complex clinical decision tasks in experts' decision making.
The authors sought to understand how clinicians manage complexity while dealing with complex clinical decision tasks. They found that experts cope with complexity in a variety of ways, including using efficient and fast decision strategies to simplify complex decision tasks, mentally simulating outcomes, and focusing on only the most relevant information.
AHRQ-funded; HS023349.
Citation: Islam R, Weir C, Del Fiol G .
Heuristics in managing complex clinical decision tasks in experts' decision making.
IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform 2014 Sep;2014:186-93. doi: 10.1109/ichi.2014.32.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Patient Safety
Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
In this study, the investigators examine the attitudes and opinions of pediatric users' toward the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, a computer decision support system linked to an electronic health record in four community pediatric clinics. The investigators found that pediatric users appreciated the system's automation and enhancements that allowed relevant and meaningful clinical data to be accessible at point of care.
AHRQ-funded; HS018453; HS017939.
Citation: Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM .
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):146-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001851..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Primary Care
Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
In this study, the investigators examine the attitudes and opinions of pediatric users' toward the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, a computer decision support system linked to an electronic health record in four community pediatric clinics. The investigators found that pediatric users appreciated the system's automation and enhancements that allowed relevant and meaningful clinical data to be accessible at point of care.
AHRQ-funded; HS018453; HS017939.
Citation: Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM .
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):146-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001851..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Primary Care