National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Behavioral Health (3)
- Cancer (3)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Skin Cancer (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- (-) Comparative Effectiveness (11)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Depression (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (7)
- Medication (3)
- Outcomes (6)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (6)
- Primary Care (1)
- Sepsis (1)
- Shared Decision Making (2)
- Surgery (2)
- (-) Treatments (11)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 11 of 11 Research Studies DisplayedDe B, Pasalic D, Barocas DA
Patient-reported outcomes after external beam radiotherapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost vs radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: five-year results from a prospective comparative effectiveness study.
The purpose of this study was to compare patient reported outcomes through 5 years following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost for localized prostate cancer. The researchers enrolled men 80 years of age or under who had localized prostate adenocarcinoma and followed them longitudinally from 2011 to 2012. The study found that when compared with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was related with clinically meaningful worse urinary irritative/obstructive and better urinary incontinence function through 5 years. Urinary function bother was similar between groups. Treatment with external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was associated with worse bowel function through 5 years compared to radical prostatectomy. Treatment with external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was associated with better sexual function at 1 year compared to radical prostatectomy, but there was insufficient evidence to reject the supposition that no difference was seen at 3 or 5 years. The researcher concluded that external beam radiation therapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost was related with clinically meaningful worse urinary irritative/obstructive and bowel functions but better urinary incontinence function through 5 years after treatment compared to radical prostatectomy.
AHRQ-funded; HS019356; HS022640.
Citation: De B, Pasalic D, Barocas DA .
Patient-reported outcomes after external beam radiotherapy with low dose rate brachytherapy boost vs radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: five-year results from a prospective comparative effectiveness study.
J Urol 2022 Dec;208(6):1226-39. doi: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002902..
Keywords: Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Cancer, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Treatments
Drewry AM, Mohr NM, Ablordeppey EA
Therapeutic hyperthermia is associated with improved survival in afebrile critically ill patients with sepsis: a pilot randomized trial.
This study’s objective was to test the hypothesis that forced-air warming of critically ill afebrile sepsis patients improves immune function compared to standard temperature management. Patients were considered eligible patients if they were mechanically ventilated septic adults with: 1) a diagnosis of sepsis within 48 hours of enrollment; 2) anticipated need for mechanical ventilation of greater than 48 hours; and 3) a maximum temperature less than 38.3°C within the 24 hours prior to enrollment. Intervention treatment was external warming using a forced-air warming blanket for 48 hours, with a goal temperature 1.5°C above the lowest temperature documented in the previous 24 hours. The authors enrolled 56 patients in this randomized, controlled trial. Participants allocated to external warming had lower 28-day mortality (18% vs 43%) and more 28-day hospital-free days. No differences were observed between the groups in HLA-DR expression or IFN-γ production.
AHRQ-funded; HS025753.
Citation: Drewry AM, Mohr NM, Ablordeppey EA .
Therapeutic hyperthermia is associated with improved survival in afebrile critically ill patients with sepsis: a pilot randomized trial.
Crit Care Med 2022 Jun;50(6):924-34. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005470..
Keywords: COVID-19, Sepsis, Treatments, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Outcomes
Wright JH, Owen J, Eells TD
Effect of computer-assisted cognitive behavior therapy vs usual care on depression among adults in primary care: a randomized clinical trial.
Computer-assisted cognitive behavior therapy (CCBT) has been proposed as a method for improving access to effective psychotherapy, reducing cost, and increasing the convenience and efficiency of treatment for depression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether clinician-supported CCBT is more effective than treatment as usual (TAU) in primary care patients with depression and to examine the feasibility and implementation of CCBT in a primary care population with substantial numbers of patients with low income, limited internet access, and low levels of educational attainment.
AHRQ-funded; HS024047.
Citation: Wright JH, Owen J, Eells TD .
Effect of computer-assisted cognitive behavior therapy vs usual care on depression among adults in primary care: a randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Netw Open 2022 Feb;5(2):e2146716. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46716..
Keywords: Depression, Behavioral Health, Primary Care, Treatments, Comparative Effectiveness
Drucker AM, Adam GP, Rofeberg V
Treatments of primary basal cell carcinoma of the skin: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of treatments of primary basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in adults. The investigators concluded that surgical treatments and external-beam radiation have low recurrence rates for the treatment of low-risk BCC, but substantial uncertainty exists about their comparative effectiveness versus other treatments. Gaps remain regarding high-risk BCC subtypes and important outcomes, including costs.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500002I.
Citation: Drucker AM, Adam GP, Rofeberg V .
Treatments of primary basal cell carcinoma of the skin: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Ann Intern Med 2018 Oct 2;169(7):456-66. doi: 10.7326/m18-0678.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Cancer: Skin Cancer, Treatments
Tyson MD, Koyama T, Lee D
Effect of prostate cancer severity on functional outcomes after localized treatment: comparative effectiveness analysis of surgery and radiation study results.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences in predicted function over time between radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized cancer varied by risk group. Patient-reported, disease-specific function was measured using the Expanded Prostate Index Composite and predicted function was estimated using regression models, compared by disease risk. The study found that sexual function was similar between surgery and radiation for patients with high-risk disease, and the authors conclude that high-risk patients undergoing radiation therapy should be counseled that their sexual function may not be as good as low-risk patients also undergoing radiation.
AHRQ-funded; HS019356; HS022640.
Citation: Tyson MD, Koyama T, Lee D .
Effect of prostate cancer severity on functional outcomes after localized treatment: comparative effectiveness analysis of surgery and radiation study results.
Eur Urol 2018 Jul;74(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.012..
Keywords: Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Cancer, Comparative Effectiveness, Treatments, Surgery, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Evidence-Based Practice
Goode AP, Coeytaux RR, Maslow GR
Nonpharmacologic treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review.
The authors assessed the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacologic treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among individuals 17 years of age and younger. Non-pharmacologic treatments they identified included neurofeedback, cognitive training, cognitive behavioral therapy, child or parent training, dietary omega fatty acid supplementation, and herbal and/or dietary approaches. They identified no new guidance regarding the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacologic treatments, concluding that, despite wide use, there are significant gaps in knowledge regarding the effectiveness of ADHD non-pharmacologic treatments.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500004I.
Citation: Goode AP, Coeytaux RR, Maslow GR .
Nonpharmacologic treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review.
Pediatrics 2018 Jun;141(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0094.
.
.
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Behavioral Health, Comparative Effectiveness, Treatments, Evidence-Based Practice
Skrivankova V, Heagerty PJ
Single index methods for evaluation of marker-guided treatment rules based on multivariate marker panels.
Answering the scientific challenge to identify and validate the factors that can reliably be used to target treatment and to quantify the expected treatment benefit as a function of candidate markers, the authors of this article propose to focus on a smooth, non-parametric evaluation of a canonical single-index score that estimates the expected treatment benefit associated with patient characteristics. Their methods decouple the model used to generate the treatment benefit score from the methods adopted in order to evaluate the performance of the resulting single-index score. They also demonstrate that the canonical single-index treatment benefit score can be used for selecting subsets of patients with enriched expected treatment response.
AHRQ-funded; HS019222.
Citation: Skrivankova V, Heagerty PJ .
Single index methods for evaluation of marker-guided treatment rules based on multivariate marker panels.
Biometrics 2018 Jun;74(2):663-72. doi: 10.1111/biom.12752..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Shared Decision Making, Outcomes, Treatments
Semenkovich TR, Panni RZ, Hudson JL
Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: a decision analysis.
This study examined comparative effectiveness and survival rates for upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in patients with clinical stage T2N20 esophageal cancer. A decision analysis model was created for the two treatment strategies. Results showed comparable median survival rates for both strategies. The optimal treatment strategy depended on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging.
AHRQ-funded; HS022330.
Citation: Semenkovich TR, Panni RZ, Hudson JL .
Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: a decision analysis.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018 May;155(5):2221-30.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.006..
Keywords: Treatments, Cancer, Surgery, Comparative Effectiveness, Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Medication
Dulai PS, Siegel CA, Colombel JF
Systematic review: monotherapy with antitumour necrosis factor alpha agents versus combination therapy with an immunosuppressive for IBD.
The authors discussed the efficacy and the risks of anti-TNF monotherapy versus combination therapy with an immunosuppressive in patients with IBD. They concluded that the addition of an immunosuppressive to anti-TNF therapy improves treatment efficacy for infliximab in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Further, the use of combination therapy appears to add no significant incremental risk for serious infections above that seen with anti-TNF or immunosuppressive monotherapy in most patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS021747.
Citation: Dulai PS, Siegel CA, Colombel JF .
Systematic review: monotherapy with antitumour necrosis factor alpha agents versus combination therapy with an immunosuppressive for IBD.
Gut 2014 Dec;63(12):1843-53. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307126.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Medication, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Treatments
Bobo WV, Reilly-Harrington NA, Ketter TA
Effect of adjunctive benzodiazepines on clinical outcomes in lithium- or quetiapine-treated outpatients with bipolar I or II disorder: results from the Bipolar CHOICE trial.
This study investigated the longer-term effects of adjunctive benzodiazepines on symptom response during treatment in patients with bipolar disorders. The investigators concluded that adjunctive benzodiazepines may not significantly affect clinical outcome in lithium- or quetiapine-treated patients with bipolar I or II disorder over 6 months, after controlling for potential confounding factors.
AHRQ-funded; HS019371.
Citation: Bobo WV, Reilly-Harrington NA, Ketter TA .
Effect of adjunctive benzodiazepines on clinical outcomes in lithium- or quetiapine-treated outpatients with bipolar I or II disorder: results from the Bipolar CHOICE trial.
J Affect Disord 2014 Jun;161:30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.046..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Depression, Medication, Behavioral Health, Treatments
Osterman MT, Haynes K, Delzell E
Comparative effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab for Crohn's disease.
This study compared the effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab, the two most commonly used anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). It found that both drugs were of similar effectiveness with respect to surgical rates, hospitalization rates, and the percentage of patients remaining on the drugs after 26 weeks.
AHRQ-funded; HS018517
Citation: Osterman MT, Haynes K, Delzell E .
Comparative effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab for Crohn's disease.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 May;12(5):811-817.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.010..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Treatments