National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (4)
- Adverse Events (3)
- Antibiotics (2)
- Antimicrobial Stewardship (1)
- Asthma (1)
- Behavioral Health (3)
- Blood Clots (2)
- Blood Pressure (1)
- Blood Thinners (6)
- Cancer (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (9)
- Care Management (1)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Chronic Conditions (3)
- Comparative Effectiveness (7)
- Diabetes (2)
- Elderly (2)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (29)
- Guidelines (11)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (7)
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (2)
- Implementation (1)
- Infectious Diseases (1)
- Long-Term Care (1)
- Medicaid (1)
- (-) Medication (29)
- Medication: Safety (1)
- Mortality (1)
- Nursing Homes (1)
- Opioids (3)
- Outcomes (7)
- Pain (2)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (12)
- Patient Safety (2)
- Practice Patterns (3)
- Prevention (6)
- Primary Care (2)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality of Care (2)
- Registries (2)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Risk (1)
- Shared Decision Making (2)
- Stroke (2)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Surgery (1)
- Tools & Toolkits (1)
- Treatments (4)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 29 Research Studies DisplayedTracer H, Newhouse CN
AHRQ Author: Tracer H
Aspirin use to prevent cardiovascular disease.
This Putting Prevention into Practice case study involves a 56-year-old man, a wellness visit, and aspirin usage to prevent cardiovascular disease. Three questions based on U.S. Preventative Serices Task Force recommendations are presented, followed by the answers.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Tracer H, Newhouse CN .
Aspirin use to prevent cardiovascular disease.
Am Fam Physician 2022 Sep;106(3):327-28..
Keywords: Medication, Cardiovascular Conditions, Prevention, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice
Chou R, Cantor A, Dana T
Statin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this study was to update the 2016 review on statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). The researchers utilized the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (to November 2021), Ovid, and MEDLINE, and selected 26 randomized clinical trials on statins vs placebo or no statin and statin intensity in adults without prior cardiovascular events. The researchers found that statins were significantly associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality absolute risk difference [ARD], stroke, myocardial infarction, and composite cardiovascular outcomes. The association with cardiovascular mortality was determined not to be statistically significant. Statin therapy was not significantly associated with increased risk of serious adverse events, myalgias, or elevated alanine aminotransferase level. Statin therapy was not significantly associated with increased diabetes risk overall, although 1 trial found high-intensity statin therapy was significantly associated with increased risk. The researchers concluded that statin therapy for primary prevention of CVD was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality and CVD events for adults with increased of risk of CVD, but without prior CVD events.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500007I.
Citation: Chou R, Cantor A, Dana T .
Statin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2022 Aug 23;328(8):754-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12138..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cardiovascular Conditions, Medication, Prevention, Evidence-Based Practice
Korthuis PT, Cook RR, Lum PJ
HIV clinic-based extended-release naltrexone versus treatment as usual for people with HIV and opioid use disorder: a non-blinded, randomized non-inferiority trial.
Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) treatment medications can improve outcomes for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and also reduce opioid use. The purpose of the study was to determine if outpatient naltrexone treatment could also reduce opioid use and improve outcomes for HIV. The researchers reported that enrollment was stopped early because of slower than expected recruitment, resulting in 114 final participants with untreated OUD and HIV, with 62% positive for fentanyl, 60% positive for cocaine, and 47% positive for other opioids at the baseline. The intervention compared treatment as usual (TAU) of methadone or buprenorphine with extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) on group differences in viral suppression at 24 weeks and past 30-day use of opioids at 24 weeks. The study reported that at 24 weeks the outcome of viral suppression was similar for TAU and XR-NTX, and that fewer XR-NTX participants initiated medication than TAU participants. The outcome of previous 30-day use of opioids was similar for TAU as compared to XR-NTX. Of those participants who did initiate medication, those administered XR-NTX experienced less days of opioid use when compared with TAU in the prior 30 days. The researchers reported that the study evidence was not conclusive but did support that XR-NTX is not inferior to TAU for HIV viral suppression, and that study participants who started XR-NTX used less opioids at 24 weeks than participants who were administered TAU.
AHRQ-funded; HS026370.
Citation: Korthuis PT, Cook RR, Lum PJ .
HIV clinic-based extended-release naltrexone versus treatment as usual for people with HIV and opioid use disorder: a non-blinded, randomized non-inferiority trial.
Addiction 2022 Jul;117(7):1961-71. doi: 10.1111/add.15836..
Keywords: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Opioids, Substance Abuse, Behavioral Health, Medication, Treatments, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Evidence-Based Practice
Cedillo G, George MC, Deshpande R
Toward safer opioid prescribing in HIV care (TOWER): a mixed-methods, cluster-randomized trial.
Healthcare and behavioral health providers are lacking a methodology to implement the 2016 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Opioid Prescribing Guideline (CDC Guideline), measure prescriber adherence to it, and systematically test its effect on patient and public health outcomes. The Guideline is currently being reviewed and revised due to concern that it may be harmful to people with chronic pain on long-term opioid therapy (CP-LTOT). The purpose of the study was to develop and test a CDC Guideline implementation strategy termed “TOWER,” focused on an outpatient HIV primary care setting with patients with CP-LTOT. The TOWER strategy included: 1) a patient-facing app for opioid management (OM-App); 2) a template for progress notes (OM-Note) intended to guide the patient’s office visit; and 3) a primary care provider (PCP) training. TOWER was developed in a multi-step, stakeholder-engaged process within a behavioral change framework. The researchers evaluated the TOWER strategy in a randomized-controlled trial of HIV-PCPs (N=11) and their patients with HIV and CP-LTOT (N=40). The main outcome was CDC Guideline adherence based on electronic health record (EHR) documentation and measured by the Safer Opioid Prescribing Tool (SOPTET). Qualitative data was also collected, including one-on-one PCP interviews. The study found that the PCPs randomized to utilize the TOWER strategy were 48% more CDC Guideline adherent. Qualitative data reflected high levels of intervention provider confidence in administering the TOWER processes, and that the OM-Note supported provider efforts, but experience with the patient-facing OM-App was mixed. The study concluded that adherence to the 2016 CDC Guidelines is not associated with worsening of outcomes for people with HIV with CP-LTOT, and adherence to the CDC Guidelines can be promoted and measured. The researchers recommend additional research into the scalability of these results and the impact of CDC Guideline adherence on public health.
AHRQ-funded; HS025641.
Citation: Cedillo G, George MC, Deshpande R .
Toward safer opioid prescribing in HIV care (TOWER): a mixed-methods, cluster-randomized trial.
Addict Sci Clin Pract 2022 May 16;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13722-022-00311-8..
Keywords: Opioids, Medication, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice
Schnipper JL, Reyes Nieva H, Mallouk M
Effects of a refined evidence-based toolkit and mentored implementation on medication reconciliation at 18 hospitals: results of the MARQUIS2 study.
This study was a follow-up of the first Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS1) that demonstrated mentored implementation of a medication reconciliation best practices toolkit. The toolkit decreased total unintentional medication discrepancies in five hospitals, but results varied by site. The toolkit has been refined with lessons learned and retooled as MARQUIS2. The tool was implemented at 18 North American hospitals or hospital systems from 2016 to 2018, offering 17 system-level and 6-patient-level interventions. One of eight physicians coached each site remotely via monthly calls and one or two site visits. A total of 4947 patients were sampled, with 1229 preimplementation and 3718 postimplementation. A steady decline in medication discrepancy rates were experienced from 2.85 discrepancies per patient down to 0.98 discrepancies. An interrupted time series analysis of the 17 sites showed the intervention was associated with a 5% relative decrease in discrepancies per month.
AHRQ-funded; HS025486; HS023757.
Citation: Schnipper JL, Reyes Nieva H, Mallouk M .
Effects of a refined evidence-based toolkit and mentored implementation on medication reconciliation at 18 hospitals: results of the MARQUIS2 study.
BMJ Qual Saf 2022 Apr;31(4):278-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012709..
Keywords: Medication, Evidence-Based Practice, Tools & Toolkits, Implementation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety
Barkun AN, Douketis J, Noseworthy PA
Management of patients on anticoagulants and antiplatelets during acute gastrointestinal bleeding and the peri-endoscopic period: a clinical practice guideline dissemination tool.
The American College of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology jointly created recommendations on the management of anticoagulants and antiplatelets during acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and the elective per-endoscopic period. The clinical practice guideline (CPG) panel was restricted in making strong recommendations regarding some relevant clinical questions because of the limited certainty of evidence in the literature. The purpose of this paper was to describe a clinical practice guideline dissemination tool for the management of patients on anticoagulants and antiplatelets during acute gastrointestinal bleeding and the peri-endoscopic period. The dissemination tool addresses provider concerns about limited certainty of evidence in the literature by providing clinicians with a companion piece to execute recommendations with contextual guidance and practical algorithms. The patient’s risks of a thromboembolic event versus the procedural risk of GI bleeding is taken into account in the implementation of the tool. The authors concluded that the clinical practice guideline dissemination tool provides both contextual information in interpreting the clinical guideline panel’s recommendations and algorithmic guidance for common scenarios encountered during endoscopic practice.
AHRQ-funded; HS025402.
Citation: Barkun AN, Douketis J, Noseworthy PA .
Management of patients on anticoagulants and antiplatelets during acute gastrointestinal bleeding and the peri-endoscopic period: a clinical practice guideline dissemination tool.
Am J Gastroenterol 2022 Apr;117(4):513-19. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001688..
Keywords: Blood Thinners, Medication, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines
Sun D, Heimall JR, Greenhawt MJ
Cost utility of lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy vs hematopoietic stem cell transplant to treat agammaglobulinemia.
This study evaluated the cost utility of lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) versus hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) to treat agammaglobulinemia. This economic evaluation used Markov analysis to model the base-case scenario of a patient aged 12 months to receive lifelong IRT vs matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT. In this evaluation, lifelong IRT cost more than HSCT ($1,512,946 compared with $563,776 [MSD] and $637,036 [MUD]) and generated similar quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (20.61 vs 17.25 [MSD] and 17.18 [MUD]). While choosing IRT over HSCT generated higher incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), it exceeded US willing-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. However, IRT prevented at least 2488 premature deaths per 10,000 microsimulations compared with HSCT treatment. But when the annual IRT price was reduced from $60,145 to below $29,469, IRT became the cost-effective strategy.
AHRQ-funded; HS024599.
Citation: Sun D, Heimall JR, Greenhawt MJ .
Cost utility of lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy vs hematopoietic stem cell transplant to treat agammaglobulinemia.
JAMA Pediatr 2022 Feb; 176(2):176-84. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4583..
Keywords: Medication, Healthcare Costs, Treatments, Evidence-Based Practice
Penfold RB, Thompson EE, Hilt RJ
Development of a symptom-focused model to guide the prescribing of antipsychotics in children and adolescents: results of the first phase of the Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY) Clinical Trial.
The purpose of this study was to develop a new approach to prescribing guidelines as part of a pragmatic trial, Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03448575), which supports prescribers in delivering high-quality mental health care to youths. Prescribing guidelines are often ignored because they do not incorporate the real-world availability of first-line psychosocial treatments, comorbid conditions, and clinical complexity. The investigators indicated that their approach addressed some of these concerns.
AHRQ-funded; HS026001; HS023258.
Citation: Penfold RB, Thompson EE, Hilt RJ .
Development of a symptom-focused model to guide the prescribing of antipsychotics in children and adolescents: results of the first phase of the Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY) Clinical Trial.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022 Jan;61(1):93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.04.010..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Medication, Behavioral Health, Patient Safety, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice
Lowenstern A, Al-Khatib SM, Sharan L
Interventions for preventing thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.
The purpose of this review was to compare the effectiveness of therapies to prevent thromboembolic events and bleeding complications in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Two independent reviewers screened citations in order to identify comparative studies of treatments to prevent stroke in adults with nonvalvular AF who reported thromboembolic or bleeding complications, then abstracted data from 220 selected articles, assessed study quality and applicability, and rated the strength of evidence. The article concludes that available direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least as effective and safe as warfarin for patients with nonvalvular AF and had similar benefits across several patient subgroups.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500004I.
Citation: Lowenstern A, Al-Khatib SM, Sharan L .
Interventions for preventing thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.
Ann Intern Med 2018 Dec 4;169(11):774-87. doi: 10.7326/m18-1523..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Heart Disease and Health, Blood Thinners, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medication, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Vermandere M, Kuijpers T, Burgers JS
Alpha-Blockers for uncomplicated ureteric stones: a clinical practice guideline.
This paper develops an evidence-based recommendation for the use of alpha-blockers for treating uncomplicated ureteric stones. It is based on an up-to-date Cochran review and applies the Rapid Recommendations approach to guideline development. An international panel of clinicians, researchers, methodologists and patient representatives was created and a recommendation was created. There is only low-quality evidence for using alpha-blockers and the net benefit was found to be small.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Vermandere M, Kuijpers T, Burgers JS .
Alpha-Blockers for uncomplicated ureteric stones: a clinical practice guideline.
BJU Int 2018 Dec;122(6):924-31. doi: 10.1111/bju.14457..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Medication
Borre ED, Goode A, Raitz G
Predicting thromboembolic and bleeding event risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.
This systematic review compared the strength of tools to predict stroke and bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking blood thinners. Sixty-one studies were found to predict thromboembolic risk and 38 to predict bleeding risk.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500004I.
Citation: Borre ED, Goode A, Raitz G .
Predicting thromboembolic and bleeding event risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.
Thromb Haemost 2018 Dec;118(12):2171-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675400..
Keywords: Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Stroke, Blood Clots, Blood Thinners, Medication, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Risk, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Moin T, Schmittdiel JA, Flory JH
Review of metformin use for type 2 diabetes prevention.
This evidence review summarizes the use of metform for type 2 diabetes prevention. Articles published between 1998 and 2017 were analyzed, and forty articles met inclusion criteria. Metformin was associated with reduced relative risk of type 2 diabetes, with the strongest evidence for use with those higher-risk patients. These patients are aged 60 years or more, BMI greater or equal to 35, and women with histories of gestational diabetes. It was also deemed cost-effective in 11 economic analyses.
AHRQ-funded; HS023898.
Citation: Moin T, Schmittdiel JA, Flory JH .
Review of metformin use for type 2 diabetes prevention.
Am J Prev Med 2018 Oct;55(4):565-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.038..
Keywords: Diabetes, Evidence-Based Practice, Medication, Prevention
Mentias A, Shantha G, Chaudhury P
Assessment of outcomes of treatment with oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and multiple chronic conditions: a comparative effectiveness analysis.
The purpose of this retrospective comparative effectiveness analysis was to determine whether there are differences in efficacy and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin regarding stroke prevention and bleeding rates, respectively, in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with multiple chronic conditions (MCC). The investigators concluded that oral anticoagulants were similarly effective in stroke prevention among patients with AF with MCC. However, the indicate that dabigatran and rivaroxaban use may be associated with lower rates of mortality in patients with MCC.
AHRQ-funded; HS023104.
Citation: Mentias A, Shantha G, Chaudhury P .
Assessment of outcomes of treatment with oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and multiple chronic conditions: a comparative effectiveness analysis.
JAMA Netw Open 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182870. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2870..
Keywords: Blood Thinners, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Medication, Evidence-Based Practice, Comparative Effectiveness, Chronic Conditions
Beg MS, Gupta A, Sher D
Impact of concurrent medication use on pancreatic cancer survival-SEER-Medicare analysis.
Researchers examined the association of several medication classes on pancreatic cancer survival, using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. They found that the use of beta-blockers, heparin, insulin, and warfarin were associated with improved survival in patients with pancreatic cancer, whereas metformin, thiazolidinedione, statin, and combination therapies were not. The authors recommended additional studies to validate these findings in the clinical setting.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Beg MS, Gupta A, Sher D .
Impact of concurrent medication use on pancreatic cancer survival-SEER-Medicare analysis.
Impact of concurrent medication use on pancreatic cancer survival-SEER-Medicare analysis..
Keywords: Cancer, Medication, Mortality, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Egan BM, Li J, Davis RA
Differences in primary cardiovascular disease prevention between the 2013 and 2016 cholesterol guidelines and impact of the 2017 hypertension guideline in the United States.
The US Preventive Services Task Force cholesterol guideline recommended statins for fewer adults than the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline by setting a higher 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease threshold and requiring concomitant diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or cigarette smoking. The 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guideline lowered the hypertension threshold, increasing 2016 guideline statin-eligible adults. This article discusses differences in primary cardiovascular disease prevention between the 2013 and 2016 cholesterol guidelines and impact of the 2017 hypertension guideline in the United States.
AHRQ-funded; P30 HS021667.
Citation: Egan BM, Li J, Davis RA .
Differences in primary cardiovascular disease prevention between the 2013 and 2016 cholesterol guidelines and impact of the 2017 hypertension guideline in the United States.
J Clin Hypertens 2018 Jun;20(6):991-1000. doi: 10.1111/jch.13314..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Heart Disease and Health, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Blood Pressure, Medication, Prevention, Primary Care, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Semenkovich TR, Panni RZ, Hudson JL
Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: a decision analysis.
This study examined comparative effectiveness and survival rates for upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in patients with clinical stage T2N20 esophageal cancer. A decision analysis model was created for the two treatment strategies. Results showed comparable median survival rates for both strategies. The optimal treatment strategy depended on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging.
AHRQ-funded; HS022330.
Citation: Semenkovich TR, Panni RZ, Hudson JL .
Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: a decision analysis.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018 May;155(5):2221-30.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.006..
Keywords: Treatments, Cancer, Surgery, Comparative Effectiveness, Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Medication
Wald-Dickler N, Holtom P, Spellberg B
Busting the myth of "static vs cidal": a systemic literature review.
This study compared the effectiveness of bactericidal antibiotics versus bacteriostatic agents. A systematic literature review was conducted of published, randomized, controlled trials that were comparison studies. Of the 56 identified trials published since 1985, 49 found no significant difference in effectiveness between the two types of antibiotics. Only 1 trial found the bactericidal agent was superior.
AHRQ-funded; HS025690.
Citation: Wald-Dickler N, Holtom P, Spellberg B .
Busting the myth of "static vs cidal": a systemic literature review.
Clin Infect Dis 2018 Apr 17;66(9):1470-74. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1127..
Keywords: Antibiotics, Medication, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice
Fudim M, Liu PR, Shrader P
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism in patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from the ORBIT-AF (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) registry.
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy may be beneficial to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but little is known about their use in patients with AF and subsequent outcomes. In order to better understand MRA use and subsequent outcomes, the investigators performed a retrospective cohort study of the contemporary ORBIT-AF (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) registry.
AHRQ-funded; HS021092.
Citation: Fudim M, Liu PR, Shrader P .
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism in patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from the ORBIT-AF (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) registry.
J Am Heart Assoc 2018 Apr 13;7(8). doi: 10.1161/jaha.117.007987..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Heart Disease and Health, Medication, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention, Registries, Stroke
Sobieraj DM, Baker WL, Nguyen E
Association of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting muscarinic antagonists with asthma control in patients with uncontrolled, persistent asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects associated with long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) vs placebo or vs other controllers as an add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids. They concluded that use of LAMA compared with placebo as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids was associated with a lower risk of asthma exacerbations.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500012I.
Citation: Sobieraj DM, Baker WL, Nguyen E .
Association of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting muscarinic antagonists with asthma control in patients with uncontrolled, persistent asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA 2018 Apr 10;319(14):1473-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2757.
.
.
Keywords: Asthma, Evidence-Based Practice, Medication, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Respiratory Conditions
Wang SV, Huybrechts KF, Fischer MA
Generalized boosted modeling to identify subgroups where effect of dabigatran versus warfarin may differ: an observational cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation.
The purpose of this study was to explore generalized boosted modeling (GBM) as a method for identifying subgroups with greater benefit or harm with dabigatran versus warfarin for treatment of atrial fibrillation. The investigators concluded that dabigatran's superiority to warfarin at prevention of thromboembolism may be greater in secondary than primary prevention. They indicated that in practice, secondary prevention patients are more often treated with warfarin.
AHRQ-funded; HS022193.
Citation: Wang SV, Huybrechts KF, Fischer MA .
Generalized boosted modeling to identify subgroups where effect of dabigatran versus warfarin may differ: an observational cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2018 Apr;27(4):383-90. doi: 10.1002/pds.4395..
Keywords: Blood Clots, Blood Thinners, Cardiovascular Conditions, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Heart Disease and Health, Medication, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention
Jump RLP, Crnich CJ, Mody L
Infectious diseases in older adults of long-term care facilities: update on approach to diagnosis and management.
The diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of infectious diseases in older adults in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), particularly nursing facilities, remains a challenge for all health providers who care for this population. This review provides updated information on the currently most important challenges of infectious diseases in LTCFs. With the increasing prescribing of antibiotics in older adults, particularly in LTCFs, the topic of antibiotic stewardship is presented in this review.
AHRQ-funded; HS022465.
Citation: Jump RLP, Crnich CJ, Mody L .
Infectious diseases in older adults of long-term care facilities: update on approach to diagnosis and management.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2018 Apr;66(4):789-803. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15248.
.
.
Keywords: Elderly, Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Infectious Diseases, Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Antibiotics, Medication, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines
McCreedy EM, Kane RL, Gollust SE
Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care: potential missed opportunities to avoid harm.
Clinicians strive to deliver individualized, patient-centered care. However, these intentions are understudied. This research explored how patient characteristics associated with a high risk-to-benefit ratio with hypoglycemia medications affected decision making by primary care clinicians. The investigators found that primary care clinicians often chose to intensify glycemic control despite individual patient factors that warranted higher glycemic targets based on existing guidelines.
AHRQ-funded; HS000011.
Citation: McCreedy EM, Kane RL, Gollust SE .
Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care: potential missed opportunities to avoid harm.
J Am Board Fam Med 2018 Mar-Apr;31(2):192-200. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170141..
Keywords: Diabetes, Elderly, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Shared Decision Making, Medication, Primary Care, Practice Patterns, Provider: Physician, Provider: Clinician, Provider
Klinge M, Coppler T, Liebschutz JM
The assessment and management of pain in cirrhosis.
The treatment of pain in patients with cirrhosis is complicated by unpredictable hepatic drug metabolism and a higher risk of adverse drug reactions. The researchers aimed to conduct a scoping review regarding pain management in cirrhosis. As with other populations, a multi-dimensional treatment approach to pain with a focus on physical, behavioral, procedural and pharmacologic treatment is recommended when caring for patients with cirrhosis and pain.
AHRQ-funded; HS022989.
Citation: Klinge M, Coppler T, Liebschutz JM .
The assessment and management of pain in cirrhosis.
Curr Hepatol Rep 2018 Mar;17(1):42-51. doi: 10.1007/s11901-018-0389-7.
.
.
Keywords: Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Care Management, Chronic Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Medication, Pain, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Dulai PS, Siegel CA, Colombel JF
Systematic review: monotherapy with antitumour necrosis factor alpha agents versus combination therapy with an immunosuppressive for IBD.
The authors discussed the efficacy and the risks of anti-TNF monotherapy versus combination therapy with an immunosuppressive in patients with IBD. They concluded that the addition of an immunosuppressive to anti-TNF therapy improves treatment efficacy for infliximab in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Further, the use of combination therapy appears to add no significant incremental risk for serious infections above that seen with anti-TNF or immunosuppressive monotherapy in most patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS021747.
Citation: Dulai PS, Siegel CA, Colombel JF .
Systematic review: monotherapy with antitumour necrosis factor alpha agents versus combination therapy with an immunosuppressive for IBD.
Gut 2014 Dec;63(12):1843-53. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307126.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Medication, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Treatments
Finnerty M, Neese-Todd S, Bilder S
Best practices: MEDNET: a multistate policy maker-researcher collaboration to improve prescribing practices.
The authors describe the Medicaid/ Mental Health Network for Evidence-Based Treatment (MEDNET), the first multistate Medicaid QI collaborative to focus on improving psychotropic prescribing. In particular, this article includes the development, infrastructure challenges, and early evidence of success of this public-academic partnership.
AHRQ-funded; HSO19937; HS021112.
Citation: Finnerty M, Neese-Todd S, Bilder S .
Best practices: MEDNET: a multistate policy maker-researcher collaboration to improve prescribing practices.
Psychiatr Serv 2014 Nov 1;65(11):1297-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400343..
Keywords: Behavioral Health, Evidence-Based Practice, Medication, Medicaid, Practice Patterns