National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedMisra-Hebert AD, Perzynski A, Rothberg MB
Implementing team-based primary care models: a mixed-methods comparative case study in a large, integrated health care system.
This mixed-methods comparative case study examined the implementation of team-based primary care models in a large integrated health system. Field observations of 9 practices were conducted along with 75 interviews and provider and staff surveys. The 9 practices were categorized into 3 groups: high, partial, and low update of the new models. Ability of the practices to implement the new team-based model depended on their ability to adapt to change and to adapt team roles in workflow.
AHRQ-funded; HS024128.
Citation: Misra-Hebert AD, Perzynski A, Rothberg MB .
Implementing team-based primary care models: a mixed-methods comparative case study in a large, integrated health care system.
J Gen Intern Med 2018 Nov;33(11):1928-36. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4611-7..
Keywords: Case Study, Health Systems, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Primary Care, Primary Care: Models of Care, Teams
Harrison MI, Grantham S
AHRQ Author: Harrison MI
Learning from implementation setbacks: identifying and responding to contextual challenges.
The authors addressed organizational learning about implementation context during setbacks to primary care redesign in an ambulatory system. They found that redesigned teams were not implemented as widely or rapidly as anticipated and did not deliver hoped-for gains in operational metrics; however, team redesign was leading to improvements in chronic care and prevention and eased provider burden. Redesign and system leaders engaged in more thorough organizational learning. Their responses to challenges helped to strengthen the redesign's prospects, improved the delivery system's position in its labor market, and helped the system prepare to meet emerging requirements for value-based care and population health.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 2902010000341.
Citation: Harrison MI, Grantham S .
Learning from implementation setbacks: identifying and responding to contextual challenges.
Learn Health Syst 2018 Oct;2(4):e10068. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10068..
Keywords: Organizational Change, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Implementation