National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Caregiving (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- Chronic Conditions (2)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Communication (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Dementia (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Disparities (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (4)
- Guidelines (3)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Health Status (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Imaging (1)
- Labor and Delivery (1)
- Medication (1)
- Men's Health (1)
- Mortality (1)
- Neurological Disorders (2)
- Outcomes (2)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (2)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (11)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Quality of Life (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (11)
- Sickle Cell Disease (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 11 of 11 Research Studies DisplayedMcGinn T, Cohen S, Khan S
The high cost of low value care.
The main focus of this study was bridging the "evidence gap" between frontline decision-making in health care and the actual evidence, with the hope of reducing unnecessary diagnostic testing and treatments. From their work in pulmonary embolism (PE) and over ordering of computed tomography pulmonary angiography, the investigators integrated the highly validated Wells' criteria into the electronic health record at two of their major academic tertiary hospitals.
AHRQ-funded; HS022061.
Citation: McGinn T, Cohen S, Khan S .
The high cost of low value care.
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2019;130:60-70..
Keywords: Healthcare Costs, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Shared Decision Making, Comparative Effectiveness
Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS, Day GS
Patient stakeholder versus physician preferences regarding amyloid PET testing.
Patient and caregiver perspectives on amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) use are largely unexplored, particularly as compared with clinician views. In this study, the investigators surveyed clinicians, patients, caregivers, and dementia advocates on topics relating to an evidence-based guideline on amyloid PET use. They found that patients and caregivers emphasized the importance of having a dementia diagnosis and placed more value on testing and outcomes for asymptomatic populations than clinicians.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159.
Citation: Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS, Day GS .
Patient stakeholder versus physician preferences regarding amyloid PET testing.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2019 Jul-Sep;33(3):246-53. doi: 10.1097/wad.0000000000000311..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Dementia, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Imaging, Neurological Disorders, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Provider, Provider: Physician
Bateni SB, Davidson AJ, Arora M
Is breast-conserving therapy appropriate for male breast cancer patients? A national cancer database analysis.
The purpose of this study was to compare overall survival rates among male breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy. A retrospective analysis identified 8445 stage I-II male breast cancer patients from the National Cancer Database and grouped them according to surgical and radiation therapy (RT). Most of the patients underwent total mastectomy, while 18.2% underwent BCT, 12.4% underwent total mastectomy with RT, and 8.2% underwent partial mastectomy alone. Partial mastectomy alone, total mastectomy alone, and total mastectomy with RT were associated with worse overall survival rates compared with BCT. The authors conclude that BCT is associated with greater survival, but the underlying mechanisms of this association warrant further study.
AHRQ-funded; HS022236.
Citation: Bateni SB, Davidson AJ, Arora M .
Is breast-conserving therapy appropriate for male breast cancer patients? A national cancer database analysis.
Ann Surg Oncol 2019 Jul;26(7):2144-53. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07159-4..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Mortality, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Ahmad FS, Kallen MA, Schifferdecker KE
Development and initial validation of the PROMIS(R)-Plus-HF profile measure.
This paper describes the efforts to develop and validate the PROMIS®-Plus-HF (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System®-Plus-Heart Failure) profile measure. The authors conducted 8 focus groups with 61 patients with HF and phone interviews with 10 HF clinicians. They tested the measure with a 600-patient sample. Validity was analyzed and confirmed using Pearson r and Spearman rho correlations with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire subscores. The measure consists of 86 items across 18 domains.
AHRQ-funded; HS026385.
Citation: Ahmad FS, Kallen MA, Schifferdecker KE .
Development and initial validation of the PROMIS(R)-Plus-HF profile measure.
Circ Heart Fail 2019 Jun;12(6):e005751. doi: 10.1161/circheartfailure.118.005751.
.
.
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Shared Decision Making, Quality of Life, Health Status
Djulbegovic B, Reljic T, Elqayam S
Structured decision-making drives guidelines panels' recommendations "for" but not "against" health interventions.
This study examined the determinants of guideline panels’ recommendations and whether there is a difference between how they make recommendations for or against health interventions. They examined the factors considered by members of 8 panels convened by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) to develop guidelines using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. They found that “for” decisions were made using certainty in evidence, balance of benefits and harms, and variability in patients’ values and preferences. However there was less strength of recommendation (SOR) certainty when making “against” recommendations.
AHRQ-funded; HS024917.
Citation: Djulbegovic B, Reljic T, Elqayam S .
Structured decision-making drives guidelines panels' recommendations "for" but not "against" health interventions.
J Clin Epidemiol 2019 Jun;110:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.009..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Pavlo AJ, O'Connell M, Olsen S
Missing ingredients in shared decision-making?
This article discusses the practice of shared decision making (SDM) for clinicians when making decisions in health care. This widespread practice is considered the best approach for person-centered care, but for individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness there are still many barriers to effective collaboration. The authors suggest that more emphasis needs to be placed on the doctor-patient relationship itself conducting SDM.
AHRQ-funded; HS023000.
Citation: Pavlo AJ, O'Connell M, Olsen S .
Missing ingredients in shared decision-making?
Psychiatr Q 2019 Jun;90(2):333-38. doi: 10.1007/s11126-019-9624-9..
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Behavioral Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient and Family Engagement
Gordon BE, Basak R, Carpenter WR
Factors influencing prostate cancer treatment decisions for African American and white men.
This prospective, population-based cohort study examined some possible reasons for mortality outcome differences for prostate cancer between African American (AA) and white patients. A cohort of 1170 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were enrolled from 2011 to 2013 before treatment in North Carolina. Participants were asked to rate their aggressiveness of their cancer, and also the importance of 10 factors their treatment decision-making process. Among low-risk patients, there was no difference in perception of their cancer as “not very aggressive”. Among high-risk patients, 54% of AA patients considered their cancer to be “not very aggressive” while only 24% of white patients did. For AA patients, cost, treatment time, and recovery time were considered very important more than white patients.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Gordon BE, Basak R, Carpenter WR .
Factors influencing prostate cancer treatment decisions for African American and white men.
Cancer 2019 May 15;125(10):1693-700. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31932..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Disparities, Men's Health, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Armstrong MJ
Developing the disorders of consciousness guideline and challenges of integrating shared decision-making into clinical practice.
The purpose of this study was to review methodology informing evidence-based guideline development and integration of guidelines into clinical care through shared decision-making (SDM) and to highlight challenges to SDM in disorders of consciousness. Recently published disorders of consciousness guideline recommendations provide strategies for clinicians to enhance quality care for these individuals and also to provide details helping clinicians partner with individuals with disorders of consciousness and their surrogates. Further research is recommended into many aspects of caring for individuals with disorders of consciousness and optimal strategies for partnering with surrogates in decision-making.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159.
Citation: Armstrong MJ .
Developing the disorders of consciousness guideline and challenges of integrating shared decision-making into clinical practice.
J Head Trauma Rehabil 2019 May/Jun;34(3):199-204. doi: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000496.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Neurological Disorders, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Crosby LE, Walton A, Shook LM
Development of a hydroxyurea decision aid for parents of children with sickle cell anemia.
This study developed a decision aid for use of hydroxyurea for parents of children with sickle cell anemia. There are national evidence-based guidelines, but they do not offer strategies for implementation. A multicomponent decision aid was developed via a needs assessment, clinic observations and iterative feedback. The decision aid was considered useful by the 75 parents and 28 clinicians who participated in all phases of the study.
AHRQ-funded; HS021114.
Citation: Crosby LE, Walton A, Shook LM .
Development of a hydroxyurea decision aid for parents of children with sickle cell anemia.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2019 Jan;41(1):56-63. doi: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001257..
Keywords: Caregiving, Children/Adolescents, Chronic Conditions, Shared Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Medication, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Sickle Cell Disease
Eden KB, Perrin NA, Vesco KK
A randomized comparative trial of two decision tools for pregnant women with prior cesareans.
The authors evaluated tools to help pregnant women with prior cesareans make informed decisions about having trials of labor. They found that women in both groups felt more informed, were more clear about their birth priorities, felt more supported, and overall reported less conflict after receiving either intervention.
AHRQ-funded; HS011338; HS013959.
Citation: Eden KB, Perrin NA, Vesco KK .
A randomized comparative trial of two decision tools for pregnant women with prior cesareans.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2014 Sep-Oct;43(5):568-79. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12485.
.
.
Keywords: Education: Patient and Caregiver, Shared Decision Making, Labor and Delivery, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Kaplan RM
AHRQ Author: Kaplan RM
Patient-centered outcome assessment may lead to different conclusions and different treatment decisions.
Over the last few decades, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), clinicians, policy makers, and patient advocates have demonstrated a growing interest in measuring patient-reported outcomes. Most illnesses are now evaluated in terms of their effects on usual life activities. This article discusses Patient-Centered Outcomes Research and the measurement of outcomes from the patient perspective.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Kaplan RM .
Patient-centered outcome assessment may lead to different conclusions and different treatment decisions.
American Journal of Accountable Care 2014 Jun 20;2(2):14-15..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research