National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Critical Care (1)
- (-) Decision Making (5)
- Diabetes (1)
- Disparities (1)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Family Health and History (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Men's Health (1)
- Mortality (1)
- Newborns/Infants (1)
- (-) Outcomes (5)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Social Determinants of Health (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedHinson JS, Martinez DA, Cabral S
Triage performance in emergency medicine: a systematic review.
The authors synthesized existing emergency department (ED) triage literature by using a framework that enables performance comparisons and benchmarking across triage systems, with respect to clinical outcomes and reliability. They found that a substantial proportion of ED patients who die post-encounter or who are critically ill are not designated as high acuity at triage. They suggested that the opportunity exists to improve interrater reliability and triage performance in identifying patients at risk of adverse outcome.
AHRQ-funded; HS023641.
Citation: Hinson JS, Martinez DA, Cabral S .
Triage performance in emergency medicine: a systematic review.
Ann Emerg Med 2019 Jul;74(1):140-52. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.022..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Decision Making, Critical Care, Outcomes, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Bateni SB, Davidson AJ, Arora M
Is breast-conserving therapy appropriate for male breast cancer patients? A national cancer database analysis.
The purpose of this study was to compare overall survival rates among male breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy. A retrospective analysis identified 8445 stage I-II male breast cancer patients from the National Cancer Database and grouped them according to surgical and radiation therapy (RT). Most of the patients underwent total mastectomy, while 18.2% underwent BCT, 12.4% underwent total mastectomy with RT, and 8.2% underwent partial mastectomy alone. Partial mastectomy alone, total mastectomy alone, and total mastectomy with RT were associated with worse overall survival rates compared with BCT. The authors conclude that BCT is associated with greater survival, but the underlying mechanisms of this association warrant further study.
AHRQ-funded; HS022236.
Citation: Bateni SB, Davidson AJ, Arora M .
Is breast-conserving therapy appropriate for male breast cancer patients? A national cancer database analysis.
Ann Surg Oncol 2019 Jul;26(7):2144-53. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07159-4..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Decision Making, Mortality, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Gordon BE, Basak R, Carpenter WR
Factors influencing prostate cancer treatment decisions for African American and white men.
This prospective, population-based cohort study examined some possible reasons for mortality outcome differences for prostate cancer between African American (AA) and white patients. A cohort of 1170 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were enrolled from 2011 to 2013 before treatment in North Carolina. Participants were asked to rate their aggressiveness of their cancer, and also the importance of 10 factors their treatment decision-making process. Among low-risk patients, there was no difference in perception of their cancer as “not very aggressive”. Among high-risk patients, 54% of AA patients considered their cancer to be “not very aggressive” while only 24% of white patients did. For AA patients, cost, treatment time, and recovery time were considered very important more than white patients.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Gordon BE, Basak R, Carpenter WR .
Factors influencing prostate cancer treatment decisions for African American and white men.
Cancer 2019 May 15;125(10):1693-700. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31932..
Keywords: Decision Making, Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Disparities, Men's Health, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Heisler M, Choi H, Palmisano G
Comparison of community health worker-led diabetes medication decision-making support for low-income Latino and African American adults with diabetes using e-health tools versus print materials: a randomized, controlled trial.
This study compared outcomes between community health worker (CHW) use of a tailored, interactive, Web-based, tablet computer-delivered tool specifically developed for the study and use of printed educational materials. In a population of low-income Latino and African American adults with diabetes and relatively low levels of formal education, participants in both CHW-led interventions reported mostly similar improvements in outcomes over 3 months.
AHRQ-funded; HS019256
Citation: Heisler M, Choi H, Palmisano G .
Comparison of community health worker-led diabetes medication decision-making support for low-income Latino and African American adults with diabetes using e-health tools versus print materials: a randomized, controlled trial.
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 18;161(10 Suppl):S13-22. doi: 10.7326/m13-3012..
Keywords: Health Information Technology (HIT), Diabetes, Decision Making, Outcomes, Social Determinants of Health
Salihu HM, Salemi JL, Nash MC
Assessing the economic impact of paternal involvement: a comparison of the generalized linear model versus decision analysis trees.
The authors illustrated a methodological comparison of decision analysis modeling and generalized linear modeling (GLM) techniques using a case study that assesses the cost-effectiveness of potential father involvement interventions. They found that lack of paternal involvement was associated with higher rates of preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, and infant morbidity and mortality, concluding that healthcare costs could be significantly reduced through enhanced father involvement during pregnancy.
AHRQ-funded; HS019997.
Citation: Salihu HM, Salemi JL, Nash MC .
Assessing the economic impact of paternal involvement: a comparison of the generalized linear model versus decision analysis trees.
Matern Child Health J 2014 Aug;18(6):1380-90. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1372-0.
.
.
Keywords: Family Health and History, Newborns/Infants, Outcomes, Pregnancy, Case Study, Decision Making