National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) (1)
- (-) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (5)
- Decision Making (3)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Medication (1)
- Opioids (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (2)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (5)
- Registries (1)
- Screening (1)
- Sepsis (1)
- Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedGale BM, Hall KK
The use of patient monitoring systems to improve sepsis recognition and outcomes: a systematic review.
This systematic review’s aim was to determine the impact of automated patient monitoring systems (PMSs) on sepsis recognition and outcomes. The review was conducted using articles published from 2008 through 2018. Nineteen articles were identified for inclusion with 4 systematic reviews and 15 individual studies. Study results for outcome measures were mixed, with more than half the studies showing a significant improvement in at least one outcome measure (eg mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, ICU transfer). Evidence for process measure improvement was of moderate strength across multiple hospital units.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500013I.
Citation: Gale BM, Hall KK .
The use of patient monitoring systems to improve sepsis recognition and outcomes: a systematic review.
J Patient Saf 2020 Sep;16(3S Suppl 1):S8-s11. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000750..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Sepsis, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Screening, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Richardson JE, Middleton B, Platt JE
Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: recommendations from the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network.
Knowledge artifacts in digital repositories for clinical decision support (CDS) can promote the use of CDS in clinical practice. However, stakeholders will benefit from knowing which they can trust before adopting artifacts from knowledge repositories. In this paper, the investigators discuss their investigation into trust for knowledge artifacts and repositories by the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network's Trust Framework Working Group (TFWG).
AHRQ-funded; HS024849.
Citation: Richardson JE, Middleton B, Platt JE .
Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: recommendations from the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network.
Learn Health Syst 2020 Apr;4(2):e10208. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10208.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
These proceedings report on the AHRQ-sponsored Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network (PCCDS LN) Technical Framework Working Group (TechFWG), which was convened to identify barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions for interoperable clinical decision support, with a specific focus on addressing the opioid epidemic. The key insights were extrapolated to CDS-facilitated care improvement outside of the specific opioid use case. If applied broadly, the recommendations should help advance the availability and impact of interoperable CDS delivered at scale.
AHRQ-funded; HS024849.
Citation: Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C .
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2020 Mar 4;2019:637-46..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Opioids, Medication, Pain, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M
AHRQ Author: Lomotan EA
To share is human! Advancing evidence into practice through a national repository of interoperable clinical decision support.
The purpose of this study was to describe how a national repository of clinical decision support (CDS) can serve as a public resource for healthcare systems, academic researchers, and informaticists seeking to share and reuse CDS knowledge resources. AHRQ’s CDS Connect has provided a functional platform where CDS developers are actively sharing their work. CDS sharing may lead to improved implementation efficiency through numerous pathways, and further research is ongoing to quantify efficiencies gained.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001U; 233201500022I.
Citation: Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M .
To share is human! Advancing evidence into practice through a national repository of interoperable clinical decision support.
Appl Clin Inform 2020 Jan;11(1):112-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701253..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Registries, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Baillie CA, Epps M, Hanish A
Usability and impact of a computerized clinical decision support intervention designed to reduce urinary catheter utilization and catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
The researchers evaluated the usability and effectiveness of a computerized clinical decision support (CDS) intervention aimed at reducing the duration of urinary tract catheterizations. They found that usability improved to 15% with the revised reminder. The catheter utilization ratio declined over the 3 time periods, as did CAUTIs per 1,000 patient-days. They concluded that the usability of the reminder was highly dependent on its user interface, with a homegrown version of the reminder resulting in higher impact than a stock reminder.
AHRQ-funded; HS016946.
Citation: Baillie CA, Epps M, Hanish A .
Usability and impact of a computerized clinical decision support intervention designed to reduce urinary catheter utilization and catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014 Sep;35(9):1147-55. doi: 10.1086/677630.
.
.
Keywords: Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI), Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)