National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (3)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (1)
- (-) Decision Making (5)
- Elderly (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Medication (1)
- (-) Primary Care (5)
- Public Reporting (1)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Sickle Cell Disease (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedIbemere SO, Tanabe P, Bonnabeau E
Awareness and use of the sickle cell disease toolbox by primary care providers in North Carolina.
The authors developed a decision support tool for sickle cell disease (SCD) for SCD management (SCD Toolbox) based on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's SCD guidelines. Using data from primary care providers (PCPs) in North Carolina, they found that PCPs rarely co-managed with a specialist, had low awareness and use of the SCD Toolbox, and requested multiple formats for the toolbox.
AHRQ-funded; HS024501.
Citation: Ibemere SO, Tanabe P, Bonnabeau E .
Awareness and use of the sickle cell disease toolbox by primary care providers in North Carolina.
J Prim Care Community Health 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211049050. doi: 10.1177/21501327211049050..
Keywords: Sickle Cell Disease, Primary Care, Chronic Conditions, Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice
Campbell NL, Holden RJ, Tang Q
Multicomponent behavioral intervention to reduce exposure to anticholinergics in primary care older adults.
This study tested the effectiveness of a multicomponent behavioral intervention to reduce the use of high-risk anticholinergic medications in primary care older adults. Ten primary care clinics within Eskenazi Health in Indianapolis were selected to test the intervention. The intervention included provider- and patient-focused components. The provider-focused component was a computerized decision support system alerting the presence of a high-risk anticholinergic and offering dose- and indication-specific alternatives; while the patient-focused component was a story-based video providing education and modeling an interaction with a healthcare provider. The intervention occurred from April 2019 through March 2020. A total of 552 older adults had primary care visits during the study period. Only 3 out of 259 provider-focused alerts led to a medication change. Of the 276 staff alerts, 4.7% were confirmed to activate the patient-focused intervention.
AHRQ-funded; P30HS024384.
Citation: Campbell NL, Holden RJ, Tang Q .
Multicomponent behavioral intervention to reduce exposure to anticholinergics in primary care older adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2021 Jun;69(6):1490-99. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17121..
Keywords: Elderly, Medication, Primary Care, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making
Schlesinger M, Kanouse DE, Martino SC
Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.
The authors identified four pathways through which complexity may impair consumer choice. They examined these pathways using data from an experiment in which consumers hypothetically selected a primary care physician. They found that some of the loss of decision quality accompanying more complex choice sets can be explained by consumers' skills and decision-making style, but even after accounting for these factors, complexity undermines the quality of decision making in ways that cannot be fully explained. They concluded by discussing implications for report designers, sponsors, and policy makers aspiring to promote consumer empowerment and health care quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978; HS016980.
Citation: Schlesinger M, Kanouse DE, Martino SC .
Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.
Med Care Res Rev 2014 Oct;71(5 Suppl):38s-64s. doi: 10.1177/1077558713496321.
.
.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Decision Making, Quality of Care, Primary Care, Public Reporting
Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
In this study, the investigators examine the attitudes and opinions of pediatric users' toward the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, a computer decision support system linked to an electronic health record in four community pediatric clinics. The investigators found that pediatric users appreciated the system's automation and enhancements that allowed relevant and meaningful clinical data to be accessible at point of care.
AHRQ-funded; HS018453; HS017939.
Citation: Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM .
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):146-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001851..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Primary Care
Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
In this study, the investigators examine the attitudes and opinions of pediatric users' toward the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, a computer decision support system linked to an electronic health record in four community pediatric clinics. The investigators found that pediatric users appreciated the system's automation and enhancements that allowed relevant and meaningful clinical data to be accessible at point of care.
AHRQ-funded; HS018453; HS017939.
Citation: Bauer NS, Carroll AE, Downs SM .
Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):146-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001851..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Primary Care