National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedBilchick KC, Stukenborg GJ
Comparative effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in combination with implantable defibrillator in patients with heart failure and wide QRS duration.
The researchers examined the long-term outcomes among Medicare patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) compared with those receiving standard implantable cardioverter defibrillators. They found that the greatest benefit of CRT-D was in patients with guideline-based class I recommendations for CRT-D. For these patients, there was a 17 percent reduction in risk of death.
AHRQ-funded; HS017693
Citation: Bilchick KC, Stukenborg GJ .
Comparative effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in combination with implantable defibrillator in patients with heart failure and wide QRS duration.
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 15;114(10):1537-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.08.017..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Medicare, Outcomes, Cardiovascular Conditions, Medical Devices
Cook EA, Schneider KM, Robinson J
Field methods in medical record abstraction: assessing the properties of comparative effectiveness estimates.
Comparative effectiveness studies using Medicare claims data are vulnerable to treatment selection biases and supplemental data from a sample of patients has been recommended for examining the magnitude of this bias. The investigators collected medical record data from a subsample of patients to assess the validity of assumptions and to aid in the interpretation of our estimates. In this paper, they sought to describe and document the process used to collect and validate this supplemental information.
AHRQ-funded; HS018381.
Citation: Cook EA, Schneider KM, Robinson J .
Field methods in medical record abstraction: assessing the properties of comparative effectiveness estimates.
BMC Health Serv Res 2014 Sep 15;14:391. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-391..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Medicare, Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies
Kumamaru H, Judd SE, Curtis JR
Validity of claims-based stroke algorithms in contemporary Medicare data: reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) study linked with medicare claims.
The researchers assessed the validity of diagnostic coding algorithms for identifying stroke in the Medicare population by linking data from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study to Medicare claims. They found that claims-based algorithms to identify stroke in a contemporary Medicare cohort had high positive predictive value and specificity, supporting their use as outcomes for etiologic and comparative effectiveness studies in similar populations.
AHRQ-funded; HS017731; HS018517.
Citation: Kumamaru H, Judd SE, Curtis JR .
Validity of claims-based stroke algorithms in contemporary Medicare data: reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) study linked with medicare claims.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2014 Jul;7(4):611-9. doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes.113.000743..
Keywords: Stroke, Medicare, Comparative Effectiveness, Outcomes
Thacker EL, Muntner P, Zhao H
Claims-based algorithms for identifying Medicare beneficiaries at high estimated risk for coronary heart disease events: a cross-sectional study.
The researchers sought to develop claims-based algorithms to identify individuals at high risk for coronary artery disease (CHD) and to identify low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol among statin users at high risk for CHD events. They found that despite low sensitivity, the high predictive value of their algorithm for high risk for CHD events supports the use of claims to identify Medicare beneficiaries at high risk for CHD events.
AHRQ-funded; HS018517
Citation: Thacker EL, Muntner P, Zhao H .
Claims-based algorithms for identifying Medicare beneficiaries at high estimated risk for coronary heart disease events: a cross-sectional study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 29;14:195. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-195..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Medicare, Risk, Cardiovascular Conditions, Chronic Conditions
Martin BI, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN
Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.
The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) provided a unique opportunity to examine the validity of a claims-based algorithm for grouping patients by surgical indication. SPORT enrolled patients for lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. The researchers found that their claims-based hierarchical coding algorithm of spine-related medical encounters correctly classified more than 90 percent of Medicare patients into their respective SPORT cohorts.
AHRQ-funded; HS018405
Citation: Martin BI, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN .
Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.
Spine. 2014 Apr 20;39(9):769-79. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000275..
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Surgery, Outcomes, Medicare