National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Elderly (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- (-) Long-Term Care (7)
- Medicare (1)
- Medication (1)
- (-) Nursing Homes (7)
- Payment (1)
- Policy (1)
- Primary Care (1)
- Provider Performance (5)
- Public Reporting (1)
- Quality Improvement (5)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (2)
- (-) Quality of Care (7)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- Transitions of Care (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 7 of 7 Research Studies DisplayedSharma H, Konetzka RT, Smieliauskas F
The relationship between reported staffing and expenditures in nursing homes.
AHRQ-funded; HS024967.
Citation: Sharma H, Konetzka RT, Smieliauskas F .
The relationship between reported staffing and expenditures in nursing homes.
Med Care Res Rev 2019 Dec 1;76(6):758-83. doi: 10.1177/1077558717739214..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Provider Performance, Medicare
Perraillon MC, Brauner DJ, Konetzka RT
Nursing home response to Nursing Home Compare: the provider perspective.
This paper examined the validity of quality ratings of nursing homes with Nursing Home Compare (NHC) and assessed the views of nursing home administrators and staff. There was a conflict found between improving ratings and competing goals of maximizing profits and avoidance of litigation. Since the NHC is self-reported there is controversy on its validity due to self-reporting bias.
AHRQ-funded; HS018718.
Citation: Perraillon MC, Brauner DJ, Konetzka RT .
Nursing home response to Nursing Home Compare: the provider perspective.
Med Care Res Rev 2019 Aug;76(4):425-43. doi: 10.1177/1077558717725165..
Keywords: Long-Term Care, Nursing Homes, Provider Performance, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Perraillon MC, Konetzka RT, He D
Consumer response to composite ratings of nursing home quality.
Health care report cards are intended to address information asymmetries and enable consumers to choose providers of better quality. This study examined whether the form of the information mattered to consumers. The investigators concluded that the form of quality reporting mattered to consumers, and that the increased use of composite ratings was likely to increase consumer response.
AHRQ-funded; HS021877; HS021861; HS000084.
Citation: Perraillon MC, Konetzka RT, He D .
Consumer response to composite ratings of nursing home quality.
Am J Health Econ 2019 Spring;5(2):165-90. doi: 10.1162/ajhe_a_00115..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Quality of Care, Provider Performance, Quality Measures
Hanlon JT, Perera S, Drinka PJ
The IOU consensus recommendations for empirical therapy of cystitis in nursing home residents.
A 19-member panel of clinical pharmacists was convened for the Improving Outcomes of UTI Management in Long-Term Care Project (IOU) funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The objective is to reach consensus on a set of recommendations for the empirical treatment of cystitis in older nursing home residents with oral anti-infective medications. A comprehensive literature search was conducted and out of that 31 recommendations were created. There were two Delphi Survey rounds conducted and those recommendations were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. In the first round three recommendations reached consensus and in the second round an additional eight recommendations were agreed on.
AHRQ-funded; HS023779.
Citation: Hanlon JT, Perera S, Drinka PJ .
The IOU consensus recommendations for empirical therapy of cystitis in nursing home residents.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2019 Mar;67(3):539-45. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15726..
Keywords: Elderly, Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Medication, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Practice
Lindquist LA, Miller RK, Saltsman WS
SGIM-AMDA-AGS consensus best practice recommendations for transitioning patients' healthcare from skilled nursing facilities to the community.
The authors assembled a cross-cutting team of experts representing primary care physicians (PCPs), home care physicians, physicians who see patients in skilled nursing facilities (SNF physicians), skilled nursing facility medical directors, human factors engineers, transitional care researchers, geriatricians, internists, family practitioners, and three major organizations: AMDA, SGIM, and AGS. This team identified issues and developed best practices perceived as feasible for SNF physician and PCP practices to accomplish.
AHRQ-funded; HS022916.
Citation: Lindquist LA, Miller RK, Saltsman WS .
SGIM-AMDA-AGS consensus best practice recommendations for transitioning patients' healthcare from skilled nursing facilities to the community.
J Gen Intern Med 2017 Feb;32(2):199-203. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3850-8.
.
.
Keywords: Quality of Care, Long-Term Care, Nursing Homes, Primary Care, Transitions of Care
Mukamel DB, Ye Z, Glance LG
Does mandating nursing home participation in quality reporting make a difference? Evidence from Massachusetts.
This study investigated one of the mechanisms that may detract from the effectiveness of quality report cards: voluntary versus mandatory participation of nursing homes in public quality reporting. It found that once reporting became mandatory, nonvolunteers improved more than volunteers in all but 2 staffing measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS021844.
Citation: Mukamel DB, Ye Z, Glance LG .
Does mandating nursing home participation in quality reporting make a difference? Evidence from Massachusetts.
Med Care 2015 Aug;53(8):713-9. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000390..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Public Reporting, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Elderly
Abrahamson K, Miech E, Davila HW
Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes: a qualitative study.
The researchers explored ways in which data were collected, thought about and used by nursing home employees as a result of participation in a pay-for-performance (P4P) program. Their findings indicated that participants in the Minnesota Performance-based Incentive Payment Program’s quality improvement (QI) projects perceived a change in the rate and manner in which they gathered, used, and considered data in their QI decisions.
AHRQ-funded; HS018464
Citation: Abrahamson K, Miech E, Davila HW .
Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes: a qualitative study.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May;24(5):311-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003362..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Payment, Provider Performance, Shared Decision Making, Policy, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care