National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Caregiving (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- (-) Decision Making (5)
- Disparities (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Guidelines (1)
- Healthcare Utilization (1)
- Long-Term Care (1)
- Nursing Homes (1)
- Palliative Care (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Payment (1)
- Policy (1)
- Provider Performance (2)
- Public Reporting (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- (-) Quality of Care (5)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Social Determinants of Health (1)
- Surgery (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedShortell SM, Sehgal NJ, Bibi S
An early assessment of accountable care organizations' efforts to engage patients and their families.
The authors sought to examine the extent to which ACOs actively engage patients and their families, explore challenges involved, and consider approaches for dealing with those challenges. They identified important practices associated with greater patient activation and engagement, including high-level leadership commitment, goal-setting supported by adequate resources, extensive provider training, use of interdisciplinary care teams, and frequent monitoring and reporting on progress.
AHRQ-funded; HS022241.
Citation: Shortell SM, Sehgal NJ, Bibi S .
An early assessment of accountable care organizations' efforts to engage patients and their families.
Med Care Res Rev 2015 Oct;72(5):580-604. doi: 10.1177/1077558715588874.
.
.
Keywords: Decision Making, Quality of Care, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Smith B, McDuff J, Naierman N
What consumers want to know about quality when choosing a hospice provider.
This study drew on focus group and survey data collected in 5 metropolitan areas to learn more about hospice quality data. The researchers found that participants placed top priority on measures related to pain and symptom management. The National Quality Forum-approved measures resonate well with consumers, who also appear to be ready for access to data on the quality of hospice providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS021870.
Citation: Smith B, McDuff J, Naierman N .
What consumers want to know about quality when choosing a hospice provider.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2015 Jun;32(4):393-400. doi: 10.1177/1049909114524475.
.
.
Keywords: Caregiving, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Decision Making, Palliative Care, Provider Performance, Public Reporting, Quality of Care, Quality Indicators (QIs)
Abrahamson K, Miech E, Davila HW
Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes: a qualitative study.
The researchers explored ways in which data were collected, thought about and used by nursing home employees as a result of participation in a pay-for-performance (P4P) program. Their findings indicated that participants in the Minnesota Performance-based Incentive Payment Program’s quality improvement (QI) projects perceived a change in the rate and manner in which they gathered, used, and considered data in their QI decisions.
AHRQ-funded; HS018464
Citation: Abrahamson K, Miech E, Davila HW .
Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes: a qualitative study.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May;24(5):311-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003362..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Payment, Provider Performance, Decision Making, Policy, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Kerr EA, Chen J, Sussman JB
Stress testing before low-risk surgery: so many recommendations, so little overuse.
The researchers sought to determine the prevalence of cardiac stress testing before low-risk surgeries, prior to commencement of a campaign to reduce routine stress testing, in order to estimate the potential effect of the campaign on future use of resources. Their study of VA and Medicare patients found that the use of routine preoperative stress testing before low-risk surgeries was very low, suggesting that interventions to further decrease testing would minimally improve quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS018781
Citation: Kerr EA, Chen J, Sussman JB .
Stress testing before low-risk surgery: so many recommendations, so little overuse.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):645-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7877..
Keywords: Decision Making, Guidelines, Quality of Care, Healthcare Utilization, Surgery
Wang G, Gold M, Siegel J
AHRQ Author: Siegel J
Deliberation: obtaining informed input from a diverse public.
The Deliberative Methods Demonstration was a randomized controlled experiment comparing four deliberation methods and a reading materials control group. After surveying 907 participants before and after deliberation, the researchers found that changes in knowledge about using medical evidence in decisionmaking were not associated with race, ethnicity, or education.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Wang G, Gold M, Siegel J .
Deliberation: obtaining informed input from a diverse public.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Feb;26(1):223-42. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0021..
Keywords: Disparities, Quality of Care, Decision Making, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Social Determinants of Health