National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (1)
- (-) Healthcare Delivery (4)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Health Systems (1)
- Hospitalization (1)
- Mortality (1)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Payment (1)
- (-) Provider Performance (4)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedAgniel D, Haviland A, Shekelle P
Distinguishing high-performing health systems using a composite of publicly reported measures of ambulatory care.
The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a measure that ranks health care systems by ambulatory care quality. The authors concluded that their measure, using publicly reported data to produce valid, reliable, and stable ranks of ambulatory care quality for health care systems in Minnesota and California, could also be used in other applications.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Agniel D, Haviland A, Shekelle P .
Distinguishing high-performing health systems using a composite of publicly reported measures of ambulatory care.
Ann Intern Med 2020 Nov 17;173(10):791-98. doi: 10.7326/m20-0718..
Keywords: Health Systems, Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Provider Performance, Healthcare Delivery
de Cordova PB
Excess mortality associated with weekend hospital admissions may be due to patient-level differences, rather than reduced staffing or services.
The author comments on a study by Walker that explained the weekend effect as arising from differences in patient characteristics among patients who present to the emergency department on the weekend. For staffing, Walker used a proxy measure because staffing information was not available. The author cautions that, although a clear rationale was provided, there should be acknowledgement that use of a proxy, whether for illness severity or staffing, may alter results.
AHRQ-funded; HS024339.
Citation: de Cordova PB .
Excess mortality associated with weekend hospital admissions may be due to patient-level differences, rather than reduced staffing or services.
Evid Based Nurs 2018 Apr;21(2):49. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102779.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Health Services Research (HSR), Hospitalization, Mortality, Provider Performance
Catchpole K, Neyens DM, Abernathy J
Framework for direct observation of performance and safety in healthcare.
This viewpoint paper discusses non-participant direct observation of healthcare processes as a rich method for understanding safety and performance improvement. The authors suggest that as a prospective method for error prediction and modelling, observation can capture a broad range of performance issues that can be related to higher aspects of the system.
AHRQ-funded; HS024380.
Citation: Catchpole K, Neyens DM, Abernathy J .
Framework for direct observation of performance and safety in healthcare.
BMJ Qual Saf 2017 Dec;26(12):1015-21. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006407..
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Patient Safety, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement
Kondo KK, Damberg CL, Mendelson A
Implementation processes and pay for performance in healthcare: A systematic review.
The authors conducted a systematic review and key informant (KI) interviews to better understand the implementation factors that modify the effectiveness of pay for performance (P4P). They concluded that P4P programs should undergo regular evaluation and should target areas of poor performance, and also that measures and incentives should align with organizational priorities, and programs should allow for changes over time in response to data and provider input.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Kondo KK, Damberg CL, Mendelson A .
Implementation processes and pay for performance in healthcare: A systematic review.
J Gen Intern Med 2016 Apr;31 Suppl 1:61-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3567-0.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Provider Performance, Payment, Quality of Care