National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedTerp S, Wang B, Burner E
Civil monetary penalties resulting from violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) involving psychiatric emergencies, 2002 to 2018.
This study analyzed civil monetary penalties resulting from Emergency Medical and Treatment Act (EMTALA) violations involving psychiatric emergencies from 2002 to 2018. Psychiatric treatment settlements are larger with the average settlement being $85,488 compared to $32,004 for non-psychiatric-related cases. Five of six of the largest settlements during the study period were psychiatric-related. The penalties were for failure to provide appropriate medical screening examinations, receive stabilizing treatment, or arrange appropriate transfer. Almost half (41%) occurred in the Southeast Region and 20% in the Central region.
AHRQ-funded; HS022402; HS025281.
Citation: Terp S, Wang B, Burner E .
Civil monetary penalties resulting from violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) involving psychiatric emergencies, 2002 to 2018.
Acad Emerg Med 2019 May;26(5):470-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.13710..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Medical Errors, Medical Liability, Behavioral Health, Quality of Care
Yu H, Greenberg M, Haviland A
The impact of state medical malpractice reform on individual-level health care expenditures.
This study aims to fill the evidence gap concerning the effect of different types of malpractice reform by examining the general population, not a subgroup or a specific health condition, and controlling for individual-level sociodemographic and health status. It found that only two of the 10 major state-level malpractice reforms had significant impacts on the growth of individual-level health expenditures.
AHRQ-funded; HS023336.
Citation: Yu H, Greenberg M, Haviland A .
The impact of state medical malpractice reform on individual-level health care expenditures.
Health Serv Res 2017 Dec;52(6):2018-37. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12789.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Costs, Policy, Medical Liability, Policy