National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedCosgrove L, Krimsky S, Wheeler EE
Conflict of interest policies and industry relationships of guideline development group members: A cross-sectional study of clinical practice guidelines for depression.
The purpose of the present study was to assess a) the disclosure requirements of guideline development groups in a cross-section of guidelines for major depression; and, b) the extent and type of conflicts of panel members. It found that most of the guidelines were developed by panels that had members with industry financial ties to drug companies that manufacture antidepressant medication.
AHRQ-funded; HS022940.
Citation: Cosgrove L, Krimsky S, Wheeler EE .
Conflict of interest policies and industry relationships of guideline development group members: A cross-sectional study of clinical practice guidelines for depression.
Account Res 2017;24(2):99-115. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1251319.
.
.
Keywords: Medication, Depression, Guidelines, Behavioral Health, Research Methodologies
Cosgrove L, Shaughnessy AF, Peters SM
Conflicts of interest and the presence of methodologists on guideline development panels: a cross-sectional study of clinical practice guidelines for major depressive disorder.
The authors aimed to review treatment guidelines for major depressive disorder and assess the relationship between endorsement of antidepressants for mild depression as a first-line intervention and financial conflicts of interest of guideline panel members. They concluded that ensuring that guideline development groups are free of commercial ties and include individuals with methodological expertise provides an important safeguard – that an evidence-based review is applied at every stage, from the framing of the questions for review, to searching, evaluating, and synthesizing the evidence.
AHRQ-funded; HS022940.
Citation: Cosgrove L, Shaughnessy AF, Peters SM .
Conflicts of interest and the presence of methodologists on guideline development panels: a cross-sectional study of clinical practice guidelines for major depressive disorder.
Psychother Psychosom 2017;86(3):168-70. doi: 10.1159/000458727.
.
.
Keywords: Depression, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies