National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Lung Cancer (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Data (1)
- Diabetes (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Elderly (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (1)
- Palliative Care (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (6)
- Patient and Family Engagement (2)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (6)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedMaas MB, Francis BA, Sangha RS
Refining prognosis for intracerebral hemorrhage by early reassessment.
The researchers compared the accuracy of a widely used prognostic score against a model derived from clinical data obtained 5 days after admission for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), a condition for which prognostication has proven notoriously challenging and prone to bias. They found that a simple reassessment after 5 days of care significantly improves the accuracy of prognosticating outcome in patients with ICH.
AHRQ-funded; HS023437.
Citation: Maas MB, Francis BA, Sangha RS .
Refining prognosis for intracerebral hemorrhage by early reassessment.
Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;43(3-4):110-16. doi: 10.1159/000452679.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Iyer AS, Bakitas M
Early palliative care in advanced illness: do right by mama.
This letter describes a case study where the doctor and the family decided not to do aggressive treatment on their mother in her 80’s with metastatic lung cancer and pneumonia. After describing the intubation procedure and the use of mechanical ventilation, the family decided that palliative care was the best option. The doctor emphasizes the use of palliative care as the best outcome for many terminally ill patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS023009; HS013852.
Citation: Iyer AS, Bakitas M .
Early palliative care in advanced illness: do right by mama.
JAMA Intern Med 2017 Jun;177(6):761-62. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0764.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Case Study, Shared Decision Making, Elderly, Palliative Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
LeRouge C, Hasselquist MB, Kellogg L
Using heuristic evaluation to enhance the visual display of a provider dashboard for patient-reported outcomes.
A human-centered design (HCD) approach to understanding the data visualization needs for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in clinical practice can optimize the visual design of an interactive PRO system. Beyond iterative methods, the authors explored the additive value of other HCD methods such as heuristic evaluation. Their evaluation led to several recommendations to improve the display, accessibility, and interpretability of the dashboard’s data.
AHRQ-funded; HS023785.
Citation: LeRouge C, Hasselquist MB, Kellogg L .
Using heuristic evaluation to enhance the visual display of a provider dashboard for patient-reported outcomes.
eGEMS 2017 Apr 20;5(2):Article 6. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1283.
.
.
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Information Technology (HIT), Data, Shared Decision Making
Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW
Prime time for shared decision making.
To guide the implementation of high-quality and achievable shared decision making, policy makers and health systems may consider the following key steps: 1) clearly define shared decision making; 2) certify decision aids and provide incentives for their evaluation and maintenance; 3) promote competency in shared decision making; 4) develop measures of shared decisionmaking; and 5) foster a culture of shared decisionmaking through easy additions to work flow and positive incentives.
AHRQ-funded; HS023000.
Citation: Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW .
Prime time for shared decision making.
JAMA 2017 Apr;317(13):1309-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0616.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Lindly OJ, Zuckerman KE, Mistry KB
AHRQ Author: Mistry KB
Clarifying the predictive value of family-centered care and shared decision making for pediatric healthcare outcomes using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
The researchers estimated (1) family-centered care (FCC) and shared decision-making (SDM) prevalence, and (2) associations of FCC and SDM (FCC/SDM) with health care outcomes among U.S. children. FCC/SDM prevalence in year 1 varied from 38.6 to 93.7 percent, and it was lower for composites with more stringent scoring approaches. FCC/SDM composites with stringent scoring approaches in year 1 were associated with reduced unmet needs in year 2.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Lindly OJ, Zuckerman KE, Mistry KB .
Clarifying the predictive value of family-centered care and shared decision making for pediatric healthcare outcomes using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
Health Serv Res 2017 Feb;52(1):313-45. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12488.
.
.
Keywords: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Children/Adolescents, Healthcare Costs
Makam AN, Nguyen OK
An evidence-based medicine approach to antihyperglycemic therapy in diabetes mellitus to overcome overtreatment.
This article discusses the importance of (1) using absolute rather than relative estimates of benefits to inform treatment decisions; (2) considering the time horizon to benefit of treatments; (3) balancing potential harms and benefits; and (4) using shared decision making by physicians to incorporate the patient's values and preferences into treatment decisions.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Makam AN, Nguyen OK .
An evidence-based medicine approach to antihyperglycemic therapy in diabetes mellitus to overcome overtreatment.
Circulation 2017 Jan 10;135(2):180-95. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.116.022622.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Diabetes, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research